Re: [HumJanenge] Wrong process RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not allowed to represent

indian democracy and indian judiciary are issue of concern.In Indian democracy fundamental rights are conferred by the very constitution and all courts are constituted under and these courts are not empowered to take away rights conferred under Article 14 R/W Article 19 and Article 21 but it appears your case court itself has infringed your fundamental rights conferred by the very constitution to which the High court and supreme court are to subordinate.This is insult of democracy and 100 crore peoples in country having faith on judicial system prasad vaidya viadya --- On Tue, 28/8/12, Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Wrong process RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not allowed to represent To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Cc: "sensitiveadvisor2008@yahoogroups.co.in" <sensitiveadvisor2008@yahoogroups.co.in> Date: Tuesday, 28 August, 2012, 11:08 PM In my own case of a civil suit Advocate filed a wrong reply by Affidavit. Not only this but the details were also untrue wholly !!! It ( Reply )was not served upon to me and a wrong representation was filed , stating that Plaintiff's Advocate was not available in Court Compound!!! Copy of reply was not served upon to me!!! Against the process of Civil Procedure Code!!!!!!!! N M was dismissed in my absence!!!!!!!!! What should I do for all wrong process. C A Shah D J USA From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2012 2:54 AM Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not allowed to represent Ol. inform the name of the authority before whom the false affidavit has been submitted., it is court, CIC or SIC. From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2012 9:56 AM Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not allowed to represent That Lawyers cannot represent before the CIC is duly notified by Central Govt in form of RTI Rules The counter of the CIC (by way of Regulations) that Lawyers could represent before CIC has been struck down by a Division Bench of Delhi High Court in my case, and Rules are very much in force since there is no stay on this by the Supreme Court - time period allowed for appeal / SLP is over and it is hence FINAL. On 8/28/12, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Can send the copy of this notification. >> > Bhaskar > >> --- On *Mon, 20/8/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>* wrote: >> >> >> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not >> allowed to represent >> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com >> Date: Monday, 20 August, 2012, 10:27 AM >> >> Since advocates (legal practitioners) are prohibited (by duly notified >> Rules) from representing >> either side at the 2nd Appeal stage, there can be no objection to >> their being disallowed at lower proceedings. >> >> Sarbajit >> >> >