Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not allowed to represent

Ol. inform the name of the authority before whom the false affidavit has been submitted., it is court, CIC or SIC.

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2012 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not allowed to represent

That Lawyers cannot represent before the CIC is duly notified by Central Govt
in form of RTI Rules

The counter of the CIC (by way of Regulations) that Lawyers could
represent before CIC has been struck down by a Division Bench of Delhi
High Court in my case, and Rules are very much in force since there is
no stay on this by the Supreme Court - time period allowed for appeal
/ SLP is over and it is hence FINAL.

On 8/28/12, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can send the copy of this notification.
>>
> Bhaskar
>
>> --- On *Mon, 20/8/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>* wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not
>> allowed to represent
>> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>> Date: Monday, 20 August, 2012, 10:27 AM
>>
>> Since advocates (legal practitioners) are prohibited (by duly notified
>> Rules) from representing
>> either side at the 2nd Appeal stage, there can be no objection to
>> their being disallowed at lower proceedings.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>>
>