Re: [HumJanenge] No Show Cause Notice for 52 days delay?

IC must send show cause notice once it is violation of prescribed 30 days limit. IC can not revert the case back. he has no discretion to do that. perhaps only way out is to file a complaint aginst the IC for violating the Act to CIC and if required later file a case.  --- On Mon, 15/8/11, Manoj Pai <manojpai@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Manoj Pai <manojpai@yahoo.com> Subject: [HumJanenge] No Show Cause Notice for 52 days delay? To: "HJ GG" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Monday, 15 August, 2011, 9:05 PM a) RTI Application dated 16th Sept 2010 b) CPIO denial of info U/s 8 (1) (d), (e) & (j) dt. 7th December 2010 c) FAA upholds CPIOs decision vide order dated 17th January 2011. d) CIC during its hearing on 27th June 2011 over rules the CPIO's decision and reverts it back to the FAA. I appreciate IC SS for her critical analysis of the respondents (Ministry of Consumer Affairs) act in dealing with case and also pulling them up, However, I fail to understand why the show cause notice for penalty for 52 days delay in the response by the CPIO was not imposed. After all the CPIO had broken the law of our country and cannot possibly be spared without any valid reason. The respondent PA Ministry of Consumer Affairs is very harsh when it comes to taking action against any erring vendor / business company / consumer organizer / factory  etc. This PA is known to bring down large multinational companies on their knees, so why the soft treatment netted out them, when they break the law of our country? Check link for decision http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_A_2011_000691_M_64785.pdf Manoj