Give below about half a dozen orders dated 12th August, 2011 issued by IC SS.
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_C_2011_000406_M_64966.pdf
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_C_2011_000405_M_64965.pdf
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_C_2011_000403_M_64964.pdf
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_C_2011_000402_M_64963.pdf
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_C_2011_000400_M_64958.pdf
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_C_2011_000401_M_64953.pdf
Except for the name of applicant & respondent, besides date of RTI Application etc. the entire orders are all in verbatim & identical in nature. A copy & paste job. Even the over lapping underline in para 2(i) as well as a few other mistakes are in common in all these orders.
For the best part, para 5 of the order concludes with the following lines "he is at liberty to file a second appeal afresh before the Commission, under section 19(3), along with appeal u/s 18, if any, within the prescribed time limit".
A second appeal is allowed u/s 19 what does Section 18 have to do with it. Besides there is no prescribed time limit for Section 18.
Could somebody please explain?
Manoj
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.