How absurd their that decision was. & in what way the citizens will be benefitted by that absurd, unwarranted, unminded decision.
As on date; only 2 ICs are performing upto some standard.S.Mishra & Shailesh Gandhi.
Rest are simply befooling the nationals just to fetch big salary, & perks, banglow, cars etc.
Obviously this ammounts to murder of the RTI Act; & therefore they must be jailed u/s 302 , 167 , 218 , 219 etc etc of IPC.
Vijendra Singh
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Manoj Pai <manojpai@yahoo.com> wrote:
I dont know if this has been debated on this list before, however, would like to raise the case of Shri Rajesh Kumar of
Delhi who had filed an RTI with the CPIO of CIC on 15 November 2011. ( I assume the year is a misprint) . CIC SM has reverted the original complaint to the FAA of the CIC and directed the latter "to enquire into the allegations made by the Complainant and after giving him an opportunity of hearing". The CIC further directs the FAA to to obtain the explanation of the CPIO in writing for not providing the information in time and to forward the same to us along with his comments before 12 September 2011." The CIC will take its decision on the penal provision after hearing the FAA.
Check full decision dated 11th August, 2011 at the following link
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SM_C_2011_000095,96_M_64729.pdf
Is this the shape of things to come? Would this apply only the complains filed against the CPIO of the CIC or would the same also be extended to other PA as well. On the bright side, larger public interest would be served, as most FAA hardly hear the appellant, let alone dispose of the appeal. The route for the Second Appeal would still be open for the appellant.
Manoj
--
Vijendra Singh
E-19, Janakpuri,
Ajanta Colony, garh road,
Meerut-250004
UP
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.