Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Re: [HumJanenge] SC cannot deny information under RTI Act: CIC

Dear Mr Surendera,

If you read Mr Gandhi's several decisions where he "respectfully disagrees" with other ICs/CICs and also the Gujarat High Court's judgment  (concerning third parties), you will easily come to know why he has disagreed, and who his remote controller is. You cant terach me anything about my legal remedies since I was using them when you were still in diapers.

Sarbajit

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Surendera M. Bhanot <surendera@avissoftware.com> wrote:
With full regards and respect to Mr. Wajahat Habibullah,  I may say that the SG has done full justice to his decision by putting a very reasoned order and the highlighting the inconsistencies that are there in the SC Rules to that of RTI Act and how the overriding effect of Section 22 of RTI Act has scored over the SC Rules. There is not an iota of space left to debate over.

However if still there is any inconsistency (or for that matter any consistency), the platform of HC/SC are always there to intervene to adjudicate as per law if the matter is brought before them. Our appreciating or condemning the SG decision got no value. If Sarabjit feels that the SG has stepped over the line, well he may move to HC/SC.

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Sir,

1) It was a typo - it should be read as Mr L. C. Singhi who was also the Registrar of the CIC and is probably well known to you from LBSA days if not earlier.

2) The statement that all your decisions were drafted by yourself is not true, because at least 2 decisions issued under your signature in my RTI cases were actually substantially drafted by me.

3)  I have never shirked from admitting that you are / were a vastly superior Commissioner than the likes of Mr Shailesh Gandhi.

With best wishes

Sarbajit



On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:18 PM, wajahat <whabibullah@nic.in> wrote:
Excuse me! All my decisions were drafted by myself, and there never was anybody by the name of Singhvi in the position of JS or anything else in the Commission. But thanks for the very rare compliment-which would never have come were I still CCIC!
Wajahat


----- Original Message -----
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 1:29 pm
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] SC cannot deny information under RTI Act: CIC
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com

> Dear Mr Varma (and also Mr MK Gupta)
>
> It seems that you gentleman (like Mr Gandhi) are not aware of the facts concerning RTI process in the Supreme Court, and you would be well advised to read again Mr Habibullahs order in Adv Manish Khanna versus Supreme Court which is exceedingly well crafted considering the ground realities alluded to therein. It is another entirely that the decision in Adv Khanna's case was drafted by Mr LCSinghvi (the then JS-Law/CIC) and not by Mr Habibullah. The case number is CIC/WB/A/2006/00940
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Narayan Varma <narayanvarma2011@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is no bunking. It is taking different view if one is convinced that view earlier taken by IC/CIC is incorrect. If One is to follow always what is decided  earlier, there will be no development of law or progress of law or understanding different view in any matter. I believe view now expressed by IC SG is the correct view, In fact sometime before on this sight strong objection was taken in context of registrar of companies matter and decision was debunked by many members.
> Narayan Varma
>
>
> On 16 May 2011 23:51, Shailesh Kumar Shukla <shailesh183@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Thanks for the updates..
> Please keep it up..
> Regards....
>

> From: Sidharth Misra <sidharthbbsr@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Mon, 16 May, 2011 4:55:19 PM
> Subject: [HumJanenge] SC cannot deny information under RTI Act: CIC
>
> IF IC Gandhi debunks his old boss Wajahat this way, does it mean that
> the prior decisions of CIC/SIC has no precedential  value ?
>
>
> http://goo.gl/umpW6
>
>
>
> --
> Narayan Varma
> 56B Mittal Tower,
> 210 Nariman Point
> Mumbai 400 021
> RTI PCGT helpline 09322882288           
>  my cell   09821096052
>




--
"Our biggest competition is never with the others.
Instead, it is always within ourselves.
It doesn't matter if where we end up - first or at last.
If we do our best to do better than before, we've won"


Warm Regards


Surendera M. Bhanot

- President, RTI Help & Assistance Forum Chandigarh
- Youth for Human Rights International YHRI - South Asia
- CEO, Avis Software, Chandigarh 
- Convener & Life Member, Consumers Association Chandigarh
- Jt. Secretary, Amateur Judo Association of Chandigarh
- Member, SPACE - Society for Promotion and Conservation of Environment, Chandigarh
- Member, RTI Activist Federation, Punjab, Chandigarh

No. 3758, Sector 22-D, Chandigarh-160022
Mob: +91-9888-810-811
PHONE: +91-172-2780838
FAX: 0871 266 8523 

Mail Me



DISCLAIMER: You have received this email because you any one time contacted me through mail or otherwise gave your mail-id. This e-mail is intended to be sent to the persons on my regular mail-list. In case you think this mail infringes your privacy or otherwise you do not want to receive this mail anymore, please reply with the word 'UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body of the mail. Please do not disturb the Subject line. I am sorry to see you go. But please mention the reason why you want to go. It will help me improve my services in future. Thanks


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.