It seems that you gentleman (like Mr Gandhi) are not aware of the facts concerning RTI process in the Supreme Court, and you would be well advised to read again Mr Habibullahs order in Adv Manish Khanna versus Supreme Court which is exceedingly well crafted considering the ground realities alluded to therein. It is another entirely that the decision in Adv Khanna's case was drafted by Mr LCSinghvi (the then JS-Law/CIC) and not by Mr Habibullah. The case number is CIC/WB/A/2006/00940
Sarbajit
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Narayan Varma <narayanvarma2011@gmail.com> wrote:
It is no bunking. It is taking different view if one is convinced that view earlier taken by IC/CIC is incorrect. If One is to follow always what is decided earlier, there will be no development of law or progress of law or understanding different view in any matter. I believe view now expressed by IC SG is the correct view, In fact sometime before on this sight strong objection was taken in context of registrar of companies matter and decision was debunked by many members.
Narayan Varma--On 16 May 2011 23:51, Shailesh Kumar Shukla <shailesh183@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
Thanks for the updates..Please keep it up..Regards....
From: Sidharth Misra <sidharthbbsr@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, 16 May, 2011 4:55:19 PM
Subject: [HumJanenge] SC cannot deny information under RTI Act: CIC
IF IC Gandhi debunks his old boss Wajahat this way, does it mean that
the prior decisions of CIC/SIC has no precedential value ?
http://goo.gl/umpW6
Narayan Varma
56B Mittal Tower,
210 Nariman Point
Mumbai 400 021
RTI PCGT helpline 09322882288
my cell 09821096052
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.