Re: [HumJanenge] protection to corrupt the Register of company acting against RTI act.

Please elaborate so that something can be suggested

On 5/20/11, satyabrata biswas <satyabiswas@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> 1] I know a govt. department, who buys materials in crores from govt fund -
> sells them and pockets the money.
> And
> 2] They also Place the order - take bills - pay cheque but do not take
> materials - share the money. 80% govt.officers & 20% suppliers by namesake
> What can we do?
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------ sponsored
> link: yahoo recommended - http://msn.medsplacerx.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 02:27:45 +0530
> From: djshah1944@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] protection to corrupt the Register of company
> acting against RTI act.
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>
>
>
> Thanks.
> I do not have all details in USA?
> C A Shah D J
> USA
>
>
>
>
>
> From: RAKESH GUPTA <snehcs@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 10:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] protection to corrupt the Register of company
> acting against RTI act.
>
>
> kindly sent a reminder cum complaint to MCA secretary
> rakesh gupta
>
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Dear Shri Rakeshji,
> I had filed an appeal to RTI Order( For
> Information) with Registrar of Companies. But no order!!!
>
>
> C A Shah D J
> USA
>
>
>
>
>
> From: RAKESH GUPTA <snehcs2@yahoo.co.in>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, 14 May 2011 11:22 PM
> Subject: [HumJanenge] protection to corrupt the Register of company acting
> against RTI act.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> it is deliberate wrong orders of CIC to protect corruption.
> This type of orders means , other law will override in the request of RTI
> under RTI Act, 2005. And they provide new type of exemption.
> rakesh gupta
>
>
>
>
> From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Sat, 14 May, 2011 10:43:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] the Register of company acting against RTI act.
>
>
>
>
>
> Does it mean that RTI Act is not applicable to RoC though it is not exempt
> u.s.24 of the Act. Section 22 of the Act says that RTI Act it will have
> overriding effect. Such decisions should be read carefully and if need be,
> shld be challenged in the Court of Law.
>
> --- On Sat, 14/5/11, Sankar Pani <sankarprasadpani@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Sankar Pani <sankarprasadpani@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] the Register of company acting against RTI act.
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Date: Saturday, 14 May, 2011, 10:04 AM
>
>
> similar is my case where two applications rejected and even the CIC given
> the decision in same line citing a case.
> The order copy of CIC in Appeal No 21/IC(A)/2006 dated 29th March 2006 in
> the matter of Arun Verma Vs Department of Company Affairs, Govt. of India
> that the CPIO has sent reads as follows "There is already provison for
> seeking information under the companies act. The appellant may accordingly
> approach the registrar of the companies, as advised by the appellate
> authority, to obtain the relevant information. There is no question of
> denial of information to him
>
> regards
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> DEAR ALL,
> THIS IS MOST CORRUPTED ORGANIZATION IN INDIA UNDER THE
> GUISE OF MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS. IF YOU MAKE A COMPLAINT TO THEM
> NOTHING WILL HAPPEN FOR YEARS ...
> THERE IS ONE CASE WHERE ALL OUT RIGHT DISTORTATION OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES,
> AUDITING PRINCIPLES, PROVISIONS OF LAW AND O N THEIR RECORD THIS FACT IS
> AVAILABLE , NOT DOING ANY THING FOR LAST 17 YEARS! MY RTI APPLICATION IS
> ALSO REJECTED SEVERAL TIMES APPEAL ALSO???
> THEY TAKE SHELTER OF SOME IRRELEVANT CASES ???
>
> C A Shah D J
> USA
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Friday, 13 May 2011 2:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] the Register of company acting against RTI act.
>
>
>
>
>
> You may please read CIC decision in "CIC/AT/A/2007/00112" "K.Lall versus
> RoC/MCA"
> Sarbajit
>
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:33 PM, gopala krishnan
> <gopalakrishnanvelu@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> sir,
> i requested copies of balance sheet and IT returns of D3D tech,
> chennai to Register of companies, chennai under rti act 2005. Public
> information officer not supplied copy and asked me see in his
> website (MCA21). i searched in website but asking pay rs.50/- to view
> the document. I made appeal to first appellate authority to furnish
> the copy in the form i sought and supply the copies free of cost as
> per sec 7(6) of the RTI act. The appeallate authority informed me, for
> supplying the copies i have to pay Rs.25/- per page. as per RTI act
> for supplying the copies A4 rs2 per page. the Register of company
> acting against RTI act.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sankar Prasad Pani
> A-70, Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
> India
> PIN-751007
> Cell- 9437279278
> http://environmentalrights-sankar.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181