Re: [HumJanenge] Cabinet note not secret: Info panel

You can find the whole text of the refered judgement in the Journal "INFORMATION DECISIONS" Pulished by Shreeram Law House, Chandigarh or in the book "TREATISE ON RTI ACT, 2005" Published by Bharat Law House, New Delhi, THIRD Edition, written by me. Not only this Judgement but many other Judgements, Whole Text with Citation you will find in this book on a C.D.

 

Dr. NIRAJ KUMAR
C-4/8, RIVER BANK COLONY
LUCKNOW - 226018
INDIA
Mob.: +91+9415787095

Dopt Certified "A" Grade

From: SHASHI KUMAR.A.R. <rudreshtechnology@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2011 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Cabinet note not secret: Info panel

In karnataka it is the general practice that if a Public information officer produces a copy of postal acknowledgment before the information commission saying that information sought by the rti applicant is provided then the commission is not verifying whether the information sought by the rti applicants is correctly and complete information is provided , in most of the cases the commission is not alliowing to submit before the commission regarding incomplete and irrelevant information , false information provided 

ARS KUMAR , Swamy Vivekananda RTI Jana Jagruthi Mission , Karntaka 

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:20 PM, R. Dua <r.dua1234@gmail.com> wrote:

This is to appreciate the above discussion and details given by the members. These interactions make us aware of laws.

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Vikram Simha <vikramsimha54@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

Sir , Can ihave the Citation So that i can read the AHC Order N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004. --- On Mon, 9/5/11, C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com> wrote: From: C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Cabinet note not secret: Info panel To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Monday, 9 May, 2011, 7:35 AM Vikram, There is another judgment of the Allahabad High Court (related to beneficiaries of CMs discretionary fund) in which it "respectfully" disagreed with this part of the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which you referred to. In common language, the Allahabad HC ripped apart this part of the Gujarat HC order. The whole purpose of the RTI Act will be lost if a Commission does not decide (and direct) on whether information has to be disclosed or not disclosed, while dealing with Complaints under Sec 18. RTIwanted From: Vikram Simha <vikramsimha54@yahoo.co.in> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2011 11:56 PM Subject: RE: [HumJanenge] Cabinet note not secret: Info panel With All dissussions From All eminent and learned freinds , I Have Read And with Me an Gujarath High Court order  which Reads As " Power under Sec 18 is Limited to Hold enquiry into Complaint and If Necessary to Impose Penalty -- Information Commission has no Jursidiction to Pass order directing authority to part with information"