Re: [IAC#RG] PAIN OF LISTENING TO ENGLISH NEWS T V MEDIA ANCHORS

Vote with your remotes by switching channels. But don't go for diluting freedom of expression

From: Founder-President Sent: Sunday, 25 January 2015 10:38 To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net Reply To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] PAIN OF LISTENING TO ENGLISH NEWS T V MEDIA ANCHORS

it is seen that ecah one barks at each other and even if some one sits silent then winks...!!!when his/her turn comes...even an ordinary person too can understand that now a days there is NO point to view or listen to such shows...well this is MY onw thought and NO ONE IS NEEDED TO GIVE OPINION...if you wish to look/see/listen/its all your choice

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Atish Sharma <atish2810@gmail.com> wrote:

I fully agree with the observations regarding the news channel debates.

 Atleast one of the drawbacks mentioned can be set aside immediately by controlling the volumes of the speakers so that only one person only is allowed to be heard clearly while others can be heard with much reduced volume. This option may be controlled by the anchor on the basis of the time allotted to each speaker.

It will be upto the speaker if he wishes to utilise the allotted time meaningfully towards the basic  issue or waste the time aimlessly towards unwanted shouting.

Public is not receptive to high db bickering.

​-aks​

On 23 January 2015 at 12:17, SD Windlesh <sdwindlesh@gmail.com> wrote:

I fully agree with you. The purpose of these debate is something else and not the critical examination of the subject matter.

The anchor want the reply according to the policy of the channel owners and spread the same among the public to mold their thinking.

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Brigadier Gopal <brigadiergopal@gmail.com> wrote:

so well said !!

brig h r gopal

On 21 January 2015 at 20:11, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:

To

India Against Corruption

                                                                                                      

                                                                    PAIN OF LISTENING TO  ENGLISH NEWS  T V MEDIA  ANCHORS

Obviously, the anchors in English news TV  media who conduct the debates have no in depth knowledge or specialisation in any field. However, they seem to think that they can talk on any subject whether it is economics, politics, science and technology, crime investigation, culture, foreign policy, sports, and what not. It is not an exaggeration to say that their knowledge is half baked , which is there for all to see but these anchors  do not seem to know.

They seem to have a set of people who are called to participate in debates  and they  seem to be available all the time at their beck and call. With many  participants , most of whom are directly or indirectly involved in politics  and not in any way better than the anchors in their  analytical ability, the debate is marked  by lung power rather than substance. The anchor often matches the participants in the lung power, showing  no mercy for the viewers. Certainly, intelligent people with facts and figures, who want to observe decorum ,cannot have their say in full in these debates, which viewers may be eager to listen.

Most of the viewers helplessly watch these debates and keep on changing from one channel to another, wondering whether one channel would be better than the other. This rarely happens.

Fortunately, only a fraction of Indian citizens understand English communication and amongst those who know English, only a small segment have the patience to watch entire debates but the anchors do not care. They seem to whimsically assume that the helpless viewers  will watch anything and everything.

Of course, the worst of the anchors in English  news TV media are  Arnab Goswami and Karan Thapar, who want to dominate the debate and assume that they know everything and exhibit streaks of arrogance and impoliteness. They put questions and when the participants  respond, they cut them and put more questions and shout so much that no one can hear what the participants  say.  These anchors do not seem to realise that they are so uncivilised in their behaviour.

With Indians putting up  with several inconvenience  in day today life, the pain of watching  English TV debates is one more pain that they have to endure .

N.S.Venkataraman

Nandini Voice For The Deprived

nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com

twitter : @nsvchennai 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

--

SD Windlesh

Advocate

Ph: 9811169203

Check the group: Hinduism at Stake: 

http://www.facebook.com/groups/225048637557713/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/sdwindlesh

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

--

 

sincerely-

Dinesh K.Jani

Ahmedabad-INDIA

***********************************************
This e-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged.If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of it. If you have received this message in error,please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the  sender immediately by return e-mail.
Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely,secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.
***********************************************