Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Re: [IAC#RG] [NCPRI] Text of the Writ Petition challenging 'laws' relating to the appointment of the judges of High Courts and the Supreme Court

Vishnu......hope its interested to you....if so.....revert back....thnx

On 21 Jan 2015 00:51, "Sanjay Ahuja" <ahuja.sj@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry for using this list but people need our help.

Please help by liking 


Please pass it on, it will help the poor residents of Orlem

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Adv Rodrigues

As a leading light of the cleanse judiciary movement from Goa, I would
appreciate your comments, on these recent judgements of the Delhi High
Court reported on leading legal websites.

http://www.legallyindia.com/201501155493/Bar-Bench-Litigation/ever-wondered-what-can-happen-if-you-really-push-the-bench-delhi-hc-semi-blacklists-deepak-khosla-for-1-year-in-118-page-order-khosla-vows-fight-back
Judgement:
https://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/252687857?extension=pdf&from=embed&source=embed

http://www.legallyindia.com/201411115293/Bar-Bench-Litigation/khosla-to-file-writ-against-somnath-bharti-case-dismissal
Judgement:
https://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/246223987?extension=pdf&from=embed&source=embed

We have elections shortly in Delhi, and us ordinary citizens are
confused if we should vote for legal goondas [AAP] or police goondas
[BJP] as our next CM.

Sarbajit

On 1/15/15, Aires Rodrigues <airesrodrigues1@gmail.com> wrote:
> After all that noisy hue and cry for a urgent need of Lokpal,  Kiran Bedi,
> Anna Hazare and Baba Ramdev need to now justify their deafening silence on
> the issue over the last seven months. Were they agents planted by the BJP
> to launch that agitation? They have all gone silent on the need of ending
> corruption and ushering good governance which they had earlier so vocally
> articulated. Once NaMo came to power has their hidden agenda been
> fulfilled? They have also not spoken a word on strengthening the Right to
> Information Act. God Save India.
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Venkatesh Nayak
> <nayak.venkatesh@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> The National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 (NJAC Act) and
>> the
>> 99th Constitution Amendment Act relating to the newly established
>> mechanism
>> for the appointment of judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Courts
>> have been challenged before the Supreme Court. The text of the writ
>> petition which I received from a concerned citizen is attached. The
>> grounds
>> for challenge on procedural and substantive grounds, at first sight,
>> appear
>> to be very strong. I have tried to the best of my ability to summarise
>> the
>> grounds for challenge:
> --
>
> Aires Rodrigues
> Advocate High Court
> C/G-2, Shopping Complex
> Ribandar Retreat,
> Ribandar – Goa – 403006
> Mobile No: 9822684372
> Office Tel  No: (0832) 2444012
> Email: airesrodrigues1@gmail.com

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.