Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT: IAC PUBLIC NOTICE re: Kiran Bedi

Dear Mr. Sarbajit Roy

Thanks for reply.

I don't remember where and when I said that RUSIND is impractical. Rather RUSIND is the only future for India / SAARC and even for Russia [which wouldn't come out of Ukraine crises without RUSIND which Russia knows that is the reason Russian media including leading Pravada gave RUSIND enviable coverage]

Only what has happened is that Muslim NGO (organizer of Ajmer seminar) is not finding itself up-to the level of RUSIND  to take this further.

But then other groups will eventually come forward and take RUSIND to its fruition.

Regards

HRJ

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr Jain

As the dynamics of the IAC movement and our relations with "Team Anna"
are quite complex, it is better to ignore all those past events. Just
2 days back several of the "original founders" and "core committee
members" of the Team Anna's "India Against Corruption" linked up with
me at a function, and I was amused to see that they didn't know each
other - or even of each other.

Our IAC has never underestimated the RSS. There is a great resonance
in IAC's core beliefs and  RSS's original ideology, alas now
subverted. The RSS founder Dr. K.B Hedgewar was of course a great
patriot and volunteer of Hindustan Republic Army who was deputed in
1925 by HRA to Maharashtra to expand HRA activity. Previously Dr Sahab
was part of the 'Bal' faction of the Garam forces in Congress party
through Hindu Mahasabha mentors. Soon after Dr. Sahab's death and
certain political developments caused by World War II, RSS began to
deviate from HRA's ideology and eventually fell into US hands and a
sort of pseudo-nationalism based on projection of Swami Vivekananda,
and later some others, began. What the Americans could not do directly
they did indirectly, so that they can finally capture Delhi and India.
At one swoop the unfinished goal of "Poorna Swaraj" has been shattered
by 2 foreign financed Magsaysay h*****is being proffered by USA to
become CM of Delhi.

We wish you all success in your RUSIND project.
As you acknowledge, it is impractical, utopian and hardly likely to
succeed. You may freely incorporate any clauses from IAC's core
documents into ATHPRS's manifestos

http://indiaagainstcorruption.org.in/index.php?n=Main.IACCodeOfConduct
http://indiaagainstcorruption.org.in/index.php?n=Main.IACManifesto
http://indiaagainstcorruption.org.in/index.php?n=Main.IACCharter

PS: IAC cannot afford Anna, or vice-versa, at the present time.

With best wishes

Sarbajit

On 1/21/15, Hemraj Jain <jainhemraj59@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Mr. Sarbajit Roy
>
> Thanks for reply.
>
> yes, I remember when you were resisting the efforts of Anna Team to use (or
> rather misuse) the name of your NGO the IAC, people (mostly from Team Anna)
> were cursing you. But time has proved you right.
>
> Here I have following suggestion for your consideration :-
>
> IAC could not do any thing and Team Anna could play such dirty political
> game against Anna &  rest of India for the simple reason that the main
> strength of Sangh Parivar was underestimated by IAC.
>
> BJP got unprecedented strength and ascendancy in Indian politics (from 2
> Loksabha MPs in 1984 to 282 Loksabha MPs in 2014) due to only one reason
> that it succeeded in damaging secularism in India (which Congress and
> other political parties could not stop) by suppressing Muslims with
> Dadagiri (with heavy hand) through Ayodhya movement since late eighties
> (including Babri Masjid demolition, Gujarat 2002 massacre etc) till date.
>
> Muslims are so afraid that they are are not only not prepared to file 4
> writ petitions as mentioned at S.No (4) OBJECTIVES of ATHRPS at
> http://novorossiya.today/way-to-russo-indian-state/ mentioned in my letter
> to Editor produced below but they backed out from Ajmer seminar and Delhi
> seminar to discuss ATHRPS.
>
> If your NGO can take up most of the agenda of ATHRPS (by adding or
> subtracting some points of agenda, under the banner of IAC or any other
> which you think better) then (i)-  It will restore secularism in India
> which will clean Indian politics to great extent (ii)- Give tremendous
> clout to IAC which will help IAC in not only eradicating corruption
> (through effective anti-corruption Bill) from India but also in protecting
> human rights of the Indians (who, predominant majority of them, are socio -
> economically humble and incapable of protecting their human rights).
>
> I further suggest that Anna can also be brought by you with IAC, to / lead
> / associate with said mission.
>
> Regards
>
> Hem Raj Jain
>
> (Author of 'Betrayal of Americanism')
>
> Bengaluru, (Karnataka) India
>