RE: [IAC#RG] [hc] Re: Fwd: Arvind Kejriwal in jail!

27/5/14
 
Dear Mr. S. Roy
 
I fully agree that it is premature to write off AAP because they have  a solid support  base in a section of the voting population. The only problem is lack of leadership which is being questioned by some of their founding members-Sazia IImi,Cap. Gopinath and even Kumar Vishwas. The remaining 3/4 people leading AAP dont count much to go Against AK.His decision to resign in order to fight Lok Sabha elections- financially,organisationaly was fatally wrong.
Incidentally I am curious to know about their good showing in Punjab where they got 4 MPs elected. I want to know if you helped them to win these seats. This is specially because HRA has a good following in that region if I remember correctly one of your posts. In all other states they drew blank including Delhi. Did you also play a role,in their win in December elections in Delhi? It is just a curiosity and you and you are free to reply or not.
Regds
JKGaur 
 

Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 07:55:16 +0530
From: sroy.mb@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] [hc] Re: Fwd: Arvind Kejriwal in jail!

Dear Mr. Gaur
 
I thank you for remembering that I had warned this group about Mr.
Arvind Kejriwal,
 
At this time I shall only say (for you to bookmark) that it is
premature to assume that AAP is dead / AK is finished etc. The rumors
of their (political) death are greatly exaggerated, and is scripted
for them to rise again to "enact" their tired nautanki of being
anti-corruption crusaders while the nation's prime assets are looted
and sold (in name of disinvestment) to the tycoons present at Mr.
Modi's swearing-in ceremony.
 
2 Judges of the Supreme Court, have written a judgment about this
group on 1.Nov.2013 , and considered them as "stool pigeons of
Reliance and Sahara" [ .. against very influential and powerful
business Houses, including Sahara and Reliance. It is pointed out that
the petitioner is a stool pigeon acting on the directions of these
Business Houses. We are unable to easily discard the reasoning put
forward by respondent No.4. ... We find no merit in this petition
which is accordingly dismissed.]
http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/165621647/
 
Sarbajit
 
On 5/26/14, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>  26/5/14
>
> I am afraid we are going off the tract on the subject of AK,s detention in
> jail.
>
> AK had levelled corruption charges against R.Vadra, Gadkari and Reliance.
> When he appread in AAP KI ADALAT, he was asked if he had any proof and his
> reply was in positive. Then it was suggested that he should approach the
> court with proof and he responded that it takes a lifetime to get one case
> settled in court. However, the people named by him can go to court against
> his allegations.Prior to that Ms. Damania had raised this issue. Later on
> some allegations surfaced that Ms. Damania was involved in some land grab
> near Mumbai.
>
> Mr. Gadkari thereafter refused the charge and sent him a legal notice for
> defamation and the court process was started. He should have given
> documentary evidence to court  which he did not.This is my understanding of
> this issue.
>
> 2. Freedom of speech is subject to reasonable resptriction. It does not give
> you licence to kill someone,s reputation
>
>   3.Colonial laws have been adopted since 1947. There are many unjust laws
> and provisions, but the Parliament has neither repealed or amended them.
>
> 4. Sporadic objections are raised from time to time like the present one-
> but nothing comes out of it.
>
> I had great admiration for AK inspite of S. Roy,s warning signals.But feel
> totally let down during the last 3 months.
>
> JKGaur

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in