Sunday, December 29, 2013

Re: : [HumJanenge] Re: [HumJanenge-YG] application under delhi right to information act

Article 251 in The Constitution Of India 1949
251. Inconsistency between laws made by Parliament under Articles 249 and 250 and laws made by the Legislatures of States Nothing in Articles 249 and 250 shall restrict the power of the Legislature of a State to make any law which under this Constitution it has power to make, but if any provision of a law made by the legislature of a State is repugnant to any provision of a law made by Parliament which Parliament has under either of the said articles power to make, the law made by Parliament, whether passed before or after the law made by the legislature of the State, shall prevail, and the law made by the Legislature of the State shall to the extent of the repugnancy, but so long only as the law made by Parliament continues to have effect, be inoperative
Thus rti act 2005 passed by parliament can prevail upon act of 2001


On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Mohit Goel <mr_mohitg@yahoo.com> wrote:

Dear Sarbajit ji

thanks a lot for below info. i have read about exceptions on DRTI . my question pertain to a taking copy of consent letter issued by DOE to schools. When applied under RTI 2005, they have given non sense answers and waiting for next 6 months at CIC would be a futile exercise

Just 2 last questions , Rs 5 per page is towards photocopy or reply page.
in 2nd appeal to PGC , do i need to personally appear for same

please advise

regards
Mohit 

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: HumJanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, 29 December 2013 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: : [HumJanenge] Re: [HumJanenge-YG] application under delhi right to information act

Certainly you can try and use it.

The advantage here is that the Chairman PGC is the former Chief Secy of Delhi
and has been in some very "wet" positions  prior to getting this post.
It remains to be seen if he favours you or the other side :-)

Remember DRTI 2001 is different from RTI 2005, and the exemptions are
wider. However there is some Constitutional article (Art 251 ???)
which says that provisions of RTI Act 2005 can be read into the DRTI

Sarbajit

On 12/29/13, Mohit Goel <mr_mohitg@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Sarbajit ji
>
> Thanks for your feedback. Request to please throw light on my questions in
> initial mail since discussion took different turn
>
>
> ------------------------------
> On Sat 28 Dec, 2013 1:42 PM GMT Sarbajit Roy wrote:
>
>>It has not been repealed. It is still in force. Application fee is Rs.
>>25 and Rs. 5 per page.
>>
>>On 12/28/13, bimal khemani <bimal.khemani@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  Delhi right to information act 2001. has been repealed after coming of
>>> RTI
>>> Act,2005
>>>
>>> Bimal Khemani
>>> RTI activist
>>> ALIGARH-202001
>>> INDIA
>>> Mob:935-972-4625
>>>
>>> On Saturday, 28 December 2013 1:24 PM, Mohit Goel <mr_mohitg@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Members
>>>
>>> CIC has long waiting time for appeal disposal. I need urgent information
>>> from Directorate of education and thinking of using Delhi right to
>>> information act 2001.
>>>
>>> 1. kindly advise if appeal disposable time by Public grievance commission
>>> is
>>> as high as CIC.
>>>
>>> 2. would it be advisable to use above act , since i have never used it
>>> before. I just wanted information about school fee hike in shortest time
>>> and
>>> in all my prev RTI applications under RTI 2005 act DOE has given
>>> incomplete
>>> responses etc and it would take another 6 months to get info by the time
>>> case is heard in the CIC.
>>>
>>> request to please guide on the matter and oblige
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Mohit
>>>
>>
>>--
>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
1722, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.