Dear Mr Sarbajit,
These discussions are not leading us anywhere. The thread "I am Narendra Modi's wife" needs to be laid to rest as we already have had a lot many opinions on this.
It is abundantly clear that you are hung up on Modi and like Congress you might be even dreaming of what to write next. I do appreciate your knowledge and stamina to justify your stand. I do not think any body can make even the slightest difference in your attitude to see anything positive in Modi.
Let us now hear from you, who, under the present circumstances, do you think can be a suitable candidate (with justification) to become the next PM. Going by your writings, you seem to discard Rahul, too, unless you have some hidden agenda.
Waiting to hear from you soon.
Tanpat Pannu
Air Commodore (Retd)
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Kumar_8134
You, and several other people, hold up Modi as example of all that is great, patriotic, honest and efficient etc. Let us clarify this issue once and for all.
How would you compare NaMo to Lal Bahadur "Shastri" (I hope you remember who he was) ? Contrary to his carefully contrived public image of a humble, sweet, docile Gandhian, I can assure you that "Shastri" was a morally upright HONEST person, utterly ruthless when necessary, swift in his decision making, a great patriot, not at all a Nehruvian Congressi but a secret socialist secular HINDU (non-RSS) revolutionary (his children don't measure up to him).
As per me Namo does not even possess 10% of Shastri's attributes needed to be a good PM for India.
Secondly, we are sick of people who say that Namo is the best of the worst. What Bogus Logic. Why should we accept sub-standard / mediocre people ? In any case there are much better people who can actually become PM of India, and who don't need US media PR agencies funded by CIA funds to get our votes. Everybody knows that the BJP is CIA backed as much as Sonia is a KGB agent. It was the US which persuaded BJP to blast POKHRAN-II so that we would become their N-client state (except that Congress out-manouvered them and went with France who bribe our netas 2x as much as the US does).
Thirdly its a disagreement over "isms"
NaMo="Nationalism"
IAC = "Patriotism"
Namo = "Crony Gujarati Capitalism"
IAC = "Practical Socialism"
NaMo = "Blatant Communalism"
IAC = "True (not pseudo) Secularism".
and so on
SarbajitOn Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:57 PM, S kumar <kumar_8134@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sarabjitji!!Why are you so much animous towards the upright good governance by Mody?.You are hitting below the belt a non-event that happened when he was in the tender age in school when a child marriage or betrothal took place, they never lived together an he left home for "Sanyas" and nobody has any complaints on this score. Have you read Miss.Mayo's book "Calcutta" visiting the gutters, latrines and ghetto-s like Tangra of Calcutta and Gandhi called it a Sanitary Inspector's Report? When nobody could find any black spot in Mody's life till now, the anti-Mody elements dug out this unimportant non-issue to the fore.Reg.Radadiya, he only took his gun and showed it to the Check-post staff after midnight, when they refused to believe him even though he showed his Parliament ID, BUT DID NOT FIRE? Similar norms would entrap over a hundred MP-s for murders and gun-totting esp. in UP and Bihar?Are you aware that a former President of India took his gun and shot dead his guard at the porch of his house and called the IG (there was no DGP then) and made him report it as suicide? And still completed his term?See the positive side of Radadiya, how he is overwhelmingly elected by the people of Porbander, Gandhiji's birth place and the selfless service he extends to his voters there.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.