It is not relevant whether he or other members of his family own helicopters. The question here is, do they own a business that operates helicopter taxi service. My contact tells me that the named Company is a shell company with Vadhera not being its director. But more importantly, the whole operation is done by the Air Force itself with their own fleet of helicopter. So where is the question of Vedhera running a parallel taxi service for the fare paying stranded Yatris.
From: vasant sardesai <vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>; devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com
Cc: "kumar_8134@yahoo.com" <kumar_8134@yahoo.com>; shadikatyalsearch <shadikatyall@yahoo.com>; VinodKumar <kv08535@yahoo.com>; SatbirSingh <ssbedi1945@yahoo.com>; Sanjeev Kulkarni( ReformIndia) <jeevkulkarni@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, 28 July 2013, 9:06
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] FW: UPA exposed to average Indians - Chitra Subramanian Duella
I know the provisions or presumptions of law. But in this case Kumarji on the basis of some reports claims that the great son-in-law owns oris apartner in a helocopter and you are asserting that he is not; hence it is for you to proveyour contention since uor forum is not court to give evidenceor proofs for every assertions made andit is sufficient that one has bonafide made assertion on the basis of some genuine report.
V.S.Sardesai
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 27/7/13, devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com <devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] FW: UPA exposed to average Indians - Chitra Subramanian Duella
To: "vasant sardesai" <vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>, "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Cc: "kumar_8134@yahoo.com" <kumar_8134@yahoo.com>, "shadikatyalsearch" <shadikatyall@yahoo.com>, "VinodKumar" <kv08535@yahoo.com>, "SatbirSingh" <ssbedi1945@yahoo.com>, "Sanjeev Kulkarni( ReformIndia)" <jeevkulkarni@yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, 27 July, 2013, 9:40 PM
Vasant
Ji, I am sure you already know that in law the onus of
prove rests with the one who pleads positive and not the one
who pleads negative as the negative is considered incapable
of proof.
So the
burden of proof should fall on the one who claims that
Vedhera owns and runs a Helicopter air taxi service. I
am not only denying any knowledge of the fact but also the
existence of any evidence. So the evidence to prove it will
have to come as usual from Kumar Ji, in the absence of which
it will be considered an unsubstantiated charge..
Regards Devinder
From: vasant sardesai
<vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>
To:
"indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>;
devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com
Cc:
"kumar_8134@yahoo.com"
<kumar_8134@yahoo.com>
Sent:
Saturday, 27 July 2013, 16:55
Subject: Re:
[IAC#RG] FW: UPA exposed to average Indians - Chitra
Subramanian Duella
I think it is for you to disprove, if you want ot contradict
it, what he has asserted.
V.S.Sardesai
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 26/7/13, devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com
<devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com>
wrote:
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] FW: UPA exposed to average Indians -
Chitra Subramanian Duella
To: "vasant sardesai" <vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>,
"indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Cc: "kumar_8134@yahoo.com"
<kumar_8134@yahoo.com>
Date: Friday, 26 July, 2013, 9:08 PM
I have no
basis to contradict him. He has to prove that his
information is correct. Devinder
From: vasant sardesai
<vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>
To:
"indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>;
devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com
Cc:
kumar_8134@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday,
26 July 2013, 15:51
Subject: Re:
[IAC#RG] FW: UPA exposed to average Indians - Chitra
Subramanian Duella
I think S. Kumar has giventhe name of the company where
Vadhera is the director. On what basis you are
contradicting
him?
V. S. Sardesai
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 26/7/13, devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com
<devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com>
wrote:
Subject:
Re: [IAC#RG] FW: UPA exposed to average Indians - Chitra
Subramanian Duella
To: "vasant sardesai" <vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>,
"indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Date: Friday, 26 July, 2013, 2:51 PM
Frankly,
It tentamounts to "call a dog all sorts of bad
names
and fire" I have no
objection if anyone
wants to call Vadhera as the root cause of all
India's ills including the recent floods in
Uttrakhand . As
far as aviation and the named company, it does
not
deal
with helicopter air taxi business.
.Moreover, it
does not have any one
known as Vadhera as its director.
In the company law, a company must have an
Article
of
Association, the name of the directors and its
business
activities. It also must file an annual return in
the
company's
house. Where
does the question benami activities come into
it.??
Devinder
From: vasant sardesai
<vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>
To:
"indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>;
devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com
Sent: Friday,
26 July 2013, 9:04
Subject: Re:
[IAC#RG] FW:
UPA exposed to average Indians - Chitra Subramanian
Duella
What a sane answer? What about in benami name?
V.S. Sardesai
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 26/7/13, devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com
<devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com>
wrote:
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] FW: UPA
exposed to average
Indians -
Chitra Subramanian Duella
To: "vasant sardesai" <vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>,
"indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Date: Friday, 26 July, 2013, 11:04 AM
Your
question is best addressed to those who allege that
Vadhera
helicopters flew as air taxis over Uttrakhand
during
the period of emergency. My source in India tells
me
that
there was no air charter company registered in
the
name
of Vadhera or his family.
Devinderr
From: vasant sardesai
<vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>
To:
"indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>;
devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com
Sent: Friday,
26 July 2013, 6:24
Subject: Re:
[IAC#RG] FW: UPA exposed to average Indians -
Chitra
Subramanian Duella
What is the source of your ascertaining?
V. S. Sardesai
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 24/7/13, devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com
<devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com>
wrote:
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] FW: UPA exposed to
average
Indians -
Chitra Subramanian Duella
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Date: Wednesday, 24 July, 2013, 10:39 PM
As far
as
one can ascertain Vadhera does not own any
helicopters and
as far as one can ascertain, no private
helicopter
was
allowed to operate any kind of taxi service.
It as
all
relief work under by and under the control of
the
airforce. A
manufactured news which has been attributed
to
one
Vadhera
for political propaganda purposes.
Devinder
From: Vijoy Ambasta
<vijoy.ambasta@gmail.com>
To:
indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent:
Wednesday, 24 July 2013, 5:34
Subject: Re:
[IAC#RG] FW: UPA exposed to average Indians -
Chitra
Subramanian Duella
It is important hat
such news if true, must be widely
circulated.the
truth
needs
to be ascertained through RTI to verify the
authenticity
of
the news.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Kumar
Arun <kumar2786@hotmail.com>
wrote:
(Reaching Citizens of India for RTI
approach
through you, please do forward)
Date:
Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:01:19 -0700
From: kumar_8134@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: {satyapravah} UPA exposed to
average
Indians
-
Chitra Subramanian Duella
Regarding Kedarnath
floods:
It as reported that the Helicopters
lent by Robert Vadra's Co. charged Rs.2
lakh
per
person
brought out of the Valley and dropped on an
accessible
road/
location, WHILE TO BRING A DEAD BODY/CORPSE,
VADRA
HAD
CHARGED RS. 1LAKH PER DEAD BODY.
WOULD SOME ONE ASK UNDER RTI, THE
UTTARAKHAND GOVT. WHETHER THESE ARE TRUE, AND
ASK
FOR
DETAILS OF AMOUNTS PAID FOR PRIVATE
HELICOPTERS
USED
FOR
EVACUATION?
AND WHY THE OFFER OF NARENDRA MODY TO
SEND HELICOPTERS FREE OF CHARGE FOR EVACUATION
OF
THE
STRANDED WAS
REFUSED?
From: bhagwat goel
<bhagwatgoel2000@yahoo.co.in>
Sent:
Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:17 AM
Subject: Re:
{satyapravah}
UPA exposed to average Indians - Chitra
Subramanian
Duella
I would written to PRIME
MINISTER VAJPAYEE reminding him THAT WE
ELECTED HIM
NOT
BRAJESH MISHRA.I
kept my fight with him even after his
leaving office bitterly after I realized the
full
import
of
misdeeds.
Bhagwat
Goel
From: Kumar Arun <kumar2786@hotmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, 17 July 2013 8:44 PM
Subject:
{satyapravah} UPA exposed to average
Indians - Chitra
Subramanian Duella
Only brain washed & paid
spokesperson of UPA, are trying to take on
Modi
under
the
vail of secularism. India's most
politicians
whose
only
mission have been stacking the corrupt wealth
from
the
power
and influence they carry, never liked even the
idea
of
Hindu
India dreaming towards 'Hindu Rashtra'.
Modi
becoming popular among Hindu India brings
unreasonable
fears
in all most all the corrupt politician
including
the
one
who
have been serving the party like BJP, Shiv Sena, and
several
other small allies of BJP.
In stead of talking about how the government
of
today, will serve it's people in
distress,
whether the
suffering continues in the valley of Kedarnath
or
innocent
children dying by consuming meals prepared by
the
school
in
Bihar, the media is focussing it's
discussion
to
divide the nation
further in the name of Modi.
That is why, I have requested people of India
to
drop the channels like NDTV,
IBN, etc, from their subscription of cable
TV.
Unfortunately, these channels are surviving
and
their
talk
show
host is collecting a fat check as renumeration
because
Indians are feeding their hard earned money
to
them.
It's
about time to boycott any channel and print
media
who feed the non-sense ideas in the innocent
minds
of
Indian
nationals.
One thing is very important for all the
pseudo-secular must realize that India has
been
SECULAR
since it's inception, even by the words
of
constitution
and by its action. The slogan of secularism
which
has
been
completely demoralizing from the leaders like
Nehru-Indira-Raji and now by Sonia-Rahul Gandhi and
many
undeserving political giants out side the
congress,
is an
utter disgrace for Bharat-Mata.
Dr. Kumar
Arun
From: S kumar <kumar_8134@yahoo.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, 16 July 2013, 20:30
1. Chitra's
revelations are startling and stunning that it
was
Brajesh
Mishra who was running the Govt. and LKA and
ABV
were
just
puppets obeying what he said in any matter.
Read
what
she
says:
.....It is because of who Q was that
George Fernandes, India's
Minister of Defence during the NDA regime,
told me
that
he had been told by National Security
Adviser
Brajesh
Mishra "not to
touch the Bofors file" – because of
instructions
from
former Prime Minister
Atal Behari Vajpayee and deputy Prime Minister LK
Advani. It is no secret that Vaypayee and
Advani
were very accommodating about Q and his
friends in
New
Delhi. How else can one
explain why the NDA government, in power from
1998
to
2004,
couldn't arrest Q?
It was on the Q factor that every
ambassador in Switzerland, Sweden and Italy
was
evaluated
for their
performance. One permanent representative to
the
United
Nations in Geneva,
Switzerland (PR) who was in weekly contact
with
Brajesh
Mishra, lied to the
Swiss about his interest in following the
Bofors
case. The
official
contact
between India and
Switzerland is through Bern, the
Swiss
capital. He had no
business interfering in bilateral matters
between
two
states. It is because of
Q that none of this is in the public
domain.........
2. It is clear from the above that
LKA was in complete collusion with
Sonia Gandhi, bowing
almost to her feet while meeting her or
calling her
Soniaji,
and until the Goa meet, BJP was run as a
Congress
support
Party under Sonia's directions.
LKA had apparently assured Sonia of
a third term for UPA by ensuring
continuance
of
his
leadership of BJP. LKA tried his best to
prevent
Narendra
Mody's rise to Central role, first by
faking
diarrhoea
and unable to travel (which he did to Jaipur
the
next
day),
then trying his best to deter Mody from being
made
the
chief
for the Elections in BJP strongly
supporting two
Committees
one headed by him for State Elections and the
Parliamentary
Election Committee to be decided later.
3. A strong Rajnath SIngh defied the
opposition from Ananth Kumar and mild
resistance
from
Sushmaji and other seniors at Goa, and
announced
Narendra
Mody as the Poll Panel Chief, that led to the
drama
of LKA
resigning from the
Parliamentary Committee and the leaders
q-ing to make him withdraw but Rajnath
ignoring him
and
going to a Jaipur session.
LKA had to swallow his own spit by a
shameless approach to RSS Chief, whom he had
earlier
described as a non-entity so far as BJP was
concerned
as a
Political Party. A
compromise was reached and LKA was asked to
withdraw
his
papers.
4.
Congress has been too unhappy with the
developments
and
LKA's failure to contain Narendra Mody,
and
hence
LKA's visit to Nagpur to meet RSS Bhagwat
followed by
Rajnath Singh to Nagpur and the parleys led
to
mellowing
down of the decision by a statement issued
that all
decision
of the Poll Panel would be taken by Rajnath
SIngh
and
Mody
jointly and not by Mody alone.
5. It was Brajesh Mishra, the CIA
mole in PM's office, who got Rahul
Gandhi(Raol
Vinci)
and his Colombian girl friend
released
from Logan Airport, where they were arrested
by FBI
for
carrying millions
of US$ cash without declaration.
On
Sonia's approach to ABV through Brajesh,
ABV
agreed
instructing the Indian Ambassador in US to get
Raol
Vinci
released who was flown back with another
Passport
in
the
name Rahul Gandhi issued by the Embassy in
haste.
SHOULD NOT ABV BE TRIED FOR TREASON
OF THE PARTY BY WORKING AGAINST THE INTERESTS
OF
THE
PARTY
AND COUNTRY BY THESE DEEDS ESP. SAVING Q FROM
PROSECUTION?
RAM JETHMALANI RIGHLY OBERSEVED IN
AAP KI ADALAT OF INDIATV, THAT IT WAS LKA WHO
DESTROYED
THE
PROSPECTS OF BJP IN KARNATAKA BY ACTING
AGAINST
YEDDY
WITH
THE SOLE INTENTION OF MAKING ANANTHKUMAR THE
CM,
RISKING
THE
STATE AND LOSING IT TO CONGRESS- WAS IT A
DELIBERATE
ACTION
TO PLEASE SONIA?
From: S. Kalyanaraman
<kalyan97@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:32 PM
Subject: The
Quattrocchi gravy train - Chitra Subramanian Duella
http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.in/2013/07/the-quattrocchi-gravy-train-chitra.html
JUL16
The
Quattrocchi
gravy train - Chitra Subramanian
Duella
THE QUATTROCCHI GRAVY TRAINChitra is a Hindi,
Urdu,
French,
Bengali and a little Italian speaking Tam
married
to
an
Italian. She writes, is a newshog, and manages
a
company
in
Switzerland. Oh! She was also instrumental in
investigating
the Bofors story in 1987.
POSTED BY CHITRA
SUBRAMANIAM DUELLA | 36 MINS AGO
IN GOVERNANCE JULY
16, 2013 4:25 PM| 1
COMMENT
Italian
accountant Ottavio Quattrocchi who was
paid a bribe of $7.2 million in the 1986
Bofors-India
gun
deal passed away last weekend. He was no
ordinary
commission
agent operating in India. He was a gravy
train
close
to
the
Gandhi family. It was common knowledge in New
Delhi
from
the
70s that anyone who was invited to the
Quattrocchi
home
had
to wade through strategically placed photos of
the
Gandhi
family. If there was a major negotiation, Q
was
the signore in
the know.
Every Indian politician and political wannabe
who met me to "discuss" Bofors (1989 to
2013)
cursed Q
behind his back and
shuddered
in his presence. Those who did
not shiver like a
leaf when his name was mentioned
claimed
they were using the Q-stick to keep Sonia
Gandhi
out
of
power after her husband and former Prime
Minister
Rajiv
Gandhi was killed. So, everybody was in
the Q
game
for
a personal interest camouflaged as national
interest.
Everyone thought my political encounter with
the
movers
and
shakers of India was because of Bofors.
Bofors was not about Q or R. Bofors was
about the self-respect of a nation. It was
about
institutions in a democracy, the world's
largest.
It was
about Indians
defending India
in extreme weather
conditions
while India slept.
The story is simple. India bought field
howitzers from Sweden in 1986 for $1.2
billion
dollars.
The
guns were state of the art, the price
competitive.
An
additional contract ensured that we would
manufacture
the
guns
indigenously. Q (as leaked Bofors documents
showed)
walked into the deal at the 11th hour,
asked for a 3% commission payable only when
the
deal
was
concluded by a date announced by him through
his
front
company A.E. Services. He walked away a happy
man,
almost.
So why would a Swedish armaments company pay
an
Italian in
India working
for Snamprogetti, an engineering arm
of
the
Italian oil and gas firm Eni, for field
howitzers?
This is what Amitabha Pande (former
joint
secretary in-charge of the Bofors contract)
posted
on
Facebook after Q transited.
Q, like Warren Anderson of Union Carbide, was
allowed to bolt out of India. It was after I
had
filed my
report linking him directly to the Bofors
payments
with
evidence from Switzerland and Sweden and
before the
story
appeared in print. Q had fled from a major
Indian
airport
because Indians allowed Q to bolt,
knowing well that he had
cheated Indians. It was in a manner similar to how
India
had
allowed Anderson safe passage, knowing well
that he
had
blood on his hands after the Bhopal gas
tragedy.
Packing the punch of Berlusconi and Raja math
(in 21st century
Italian and Indian political lingo), Q turned
entire
generations of
Indian politicians and bureaucrats and
expert
lawyers and
political commentators into doormats. He
was
the
parrot-green elephant with a yellow trunk and
bells
on his
two hind-feet in a pink room. Andy Warhol at
the
Thyagaraja
music festival in Tanjore (Tamil Nadu)
singing
Yantaro
Mahanubhava, if
that helps.
In addition to making a lot of money talking
and
arguing about him, people individually became
prime
ministers, governors, ambassadors and
collectively
let
Indian down as they pretended to chase the
Sicily-born Q
from port to port. Q
laughed all the way to the bank,
something he had been doing in India for a
long
time.
Bribes to Q explain why when Swedish state
radio
reported on July 16, 1986 that Bofors had
bribed
Indians
and
others to take clinch the arms deal, then Prime
Minister
Rajiv Gandhi informed the Lok Sabha at the
first
opportunity
that neither he, nor his family
nor his friends had
anything
to do with the deal.
It is because of who Q was that India has
dithered on Bofors for 27 years.
It is because of Q's importance that in
2009
Indian law minister Hansraj Bharadwaj
unblocked
Q's
accounts in London so that he could retrieve
his
bribe –
the tax on which was paid by the Indian
taxpayer.
It is because of who Q was that the Bofors
case
was closed in 2011 for want of evidence. It
is
because of
who Q was that Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister
of
the
world's
largest democracy said India should apologise
to
him for hounding an innocent man. A
few
months later the
income-tax department sent him a bill for the
bribes.
It is because of who Q was that George
Fernandes, India's Minister of Defence
during the
NDA
regime, told me that he had been told by
National
Security
Adviser Brajesh Mishra "not to touch the
Bofors
file"
– because of instructions from former Prime
Minister
Atal
Behari Vajpayee and deputy Prime Minister LK
Advani.
It is
no secret that Vaypayee and Advani were very
accommodating
about Q and his friends in New Delhi. How else
can
one
explain why the NDA government, in power from
1998
to
2004,
couldn't arrest Q?
It is because of who Q was that every
institution in India
from the parliament to the
judiciary
to
the executive was tarred with the same brush.
It was because of who Q was that every
head of
India's premier investigating agency, the
Central
Bureau
of Investigation (CBI) developed half a spine
after
retirement.
It was because of Q that the CBI sleuths
during
their several trips to Sweden to get at the
truth
did
not
meet key Swedish investigators. .
It was on the Q factor that every ambassador
in
Switzerland, Sweden and Italy was evaluated
for
their
performance. One permanent representative to
the
United
Nations in Geneva, Switzerland (PR) who was
in
weekly
contact with Brajesh Mishra, lied to the
Swiss
about
his
interest in
following the Bofors case. The official
contact
between India and Switzerland is through Bern,
the
Swiss
capital. He had no business interfering in
bilateral
matters
between two states. It is because of Q that
none of
this
is
in the public domain.
1997. Such
was the detail of the money trail in the
350-odd
leaked
documents that the world's best lawyers in
the
world's
toughest
courts could not save the guilty among
whom
was
Q.
Such was the enormity and grandeur of the
judgment
in
favour
of India that Switzerland modified its laws
for
mutual
assistance in criminal matters to third
countries.
Calling
the decision "spectacular" as it had
helped
them
plug
holes in their own
system, Swiss officials and
lawmakers
welcomed the Bofors-India ruling as proof
that
their
country
was not a haven for tainted money. Criminals
could
no
longer
delay or deny access to secret bank accounts.
They
could
appeal only once at the federal level instead of
numerous
cantonal procedures and delays. The Marcos
case
from
the
Philippines and the
Bofors case from India had rocked
Switzerland
in
the
80s.
The Marcos money was held under false names
and
codes
and
getting to the exact bank account numbers was
not
easy. Q
was not bothered with such details – he was
a
blink
away
from the money. He knew he could buck India.
So in 1997, when I stood next to the Indian
ambassador to Switzerland, KP
Balakrishnan, (image
given below) I had a pretty good idea
about
what
was in the sealed box of secret documents
from
Swiss
banks
to India. Over 10 years of my life
(1986-1997)
running
between Switzerland
and Sweden investigating the
case, six
of which was sitting outside courts in
various
parts of
Switzerland finally had a meaning.
Neither the Swiss courts nor the Swedish
investigators cared who Q was. For them, he
was the
political payment, the entity that comes in
when
all
the
numbers are on the table and walks away with
a
portion of
the loot without any questions. For them, he
was
involved
in
a major criminal act against the government
of
India.
July
13, 2013. The phone rang off the hook.
Somebody
called Q
had died, so could they
get a byte? It was not an
important
story, they all said, since it was breaking on
a
weekend
and
the editors and anchors were away. So, who
wanted
to
speak
to me? A junior anchor, one of them said. Like
a
junior
engineer in Bhopal, I thought.
One television channel wanted to record my
reaction before Q's death was confirmed.
Upon
prodding,
one of them was honest enough to say they had
no
idea
why
they were calling me except that there was
this
database
on
Bofors with my number. Another said they
would
connect
with
me live at 1 am India time without disclosing
my
location.
To all those who
want to save India from
corruption, I ask – my number is on a data
base,
but
where
are the documents India received in a sealed
box
from
Switzerland?.
RIP Q. You knew what
you were doing. And
you did it without fear and with favour.
You can watch Chitra Subramaniam Duella's
interview on why India still doesn't know
the
truth
about
Bofors.http://www.newslaundry.com/2012/05/chitra-the-story-behind-bofors/
Anil
Kumar • 4
minutes ago
Salutes to Chitra
ji....Indian journalism misses you dear
Chitra
ji http://www.newslaundry.com/2013/07/the-quattrocchi-gravy-train/
__,_._,___
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.