Monday, June 10, 2013

[IAC#RG] Fwd: RTI 2nd appeal hearing within 15 days : Position is not for SIC as a whole

It looks like one will have to submit an application under the rti act to find out the distribution of resources between gaikwad and the other ics!


On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Indur Chhugani <ikchhugani@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 17 April 2013 - I sent 2nd Appeal to CIC by Speed post. Appeal No 513/2013

On 8th May 2013 - my Appeal was heard and decided in my favour.

By Ratnakar Gaikwad , CIC, Maharashtra.
 
I K Chhugani
http://www.RoguePolice.com
Mobile 091 98201 71571
From: suresh nangia <sknangia2004@yahoo.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Cc: rtitrainers@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 4:52 PM
Subject: [IAC#RG] RTI 2nd appeal hearing within 15 days : Position is not for SIC as a whole

  
    The pendency position reported in media is not for SIC as a whole. It relates only Mumbai HQ Bench where Ratnakar Gaikward takes appeal hearings. The other Bench which does not have any Commissioner to take appeal hearings has pendency position of  nearly two years. Worst case is PUNE Bench which has over 5000 2nd Appeals pendening. So this news item is not to rejoice about Actual pendency is   a matter of serious concern
 
   Pendency for various Benches as on 31.05.13 is as under (data tabulated and released by the Maharashtra State Informataaon Commission itself)
 
         MUMBAI HQ                        58           
         GREATER MUMBAI         4041
         PUNE                             5575
         AURANGABAD               3498
         NASIK                            4502
         NAGPUR                         949
         AMRAVATI                     3119   
     S K NANGIA
--- On Sat, 8/6/13, meetyesh gangar <mg9869@gmail.com> wrote:
    
From: meetyesh gangar <mg9869@gmail.com>
Subject: [IAC#RG] RTI second appeal hearing within 15 days
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Date: Saturday, 8 June, 2013, 3:59 PM

Pendency of Second Appeal come down to 58. Hearing with 15 Days flat after filling appeal.. Indeed a good work by Maharashtra SIC Mr. Ratnakar Gaikwad. Keep up the good work sir..
DNA 8th June, 2013--Page 8.
http://epaper.dnaindia.com/story.aspx?id=46670&boxid=31453&ed_date=2013-6-08&ed_code=820009&ed_page=8


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Veteran Major P M Ravindran
 
You may also like to visit:
'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com 
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)