[HumJanenge] Re: For Attn: Mr. Girish Mittal

I presume you are referring to some stay DoPT has obtained against
CIC(AT)'s direction to appoint "Transparency Officers" .. carry out
suo-moto section 4 etc...
With 100's of cases involving CIC orders (the bulk of them passed by
incompetent ICs like SG) how do you expect a Law Officer to have the
case numbers at his finger tips.

The solution is to give CIC officers IPADs so that such petty details
can be incorporated in decisions delivered by an IC (and not those
decisions delivered by a JS(Law))

Sarbajit


On Jul 15, 7:17 am, C K Jam <rtiwan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Mr Sarbajit,
>
> What kind of JS (Law) is Mr Akash Deep Chakravarti, if he does not even know a WP number in the Delhi HC but still insists that the a reference be made in the CIC order ?
>
> Please see:
>
> http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_AD_C_2012_000936_M_8598...
>
> Points (ii), (v) and (vi)
> Since the DoPT has obtained a stay order from the Delhi High Court on the said directive of the
> Commission, these points can only be taken up after the court pronounces  its  final decision.
>
> With such a JS (Law), no wonder ICs are passing illegal orders. LOL
>
> RTIwanted
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:24 AM
> Subject: [HumJanenge] For Attn: Mr. Girish Mittal
>
> Dear Girish
>
> .
> .
> .
>
> PS: You will note that Mr. Akash Deep was also present in the decision
> I have cited.
>
> Warmly
> Sarbajit