Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Another penalty order from IC DS

Indeed the odds favor the CPIO in approaching the High Court. But I doubt whether the Law is their favor, mainly owing to fact that the delay in providing the information had been established. Chances are also high that the Judge would read the act to the FAA of SBI.

Manoj

--- On Tue, 4/17/12, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: Another penalty order from IC DS
> To: "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Tuesday, April 17, 2012, 7:30 AM
> Thanks Manoj
>
> At least some of us still want this to be a RTI group. ;-)
> Any odds on whether the CPIO will challenge this rather
> "high handed"
> order in Writ jurisdiction ??
> I hope the odds are better than the current. odds that the
> "Sensex" is
> poised for a major move in the next few months.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Apr 17, 12:17 am, Manoj Pai <manoj...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > This time, IC Deepak Sandhu has imposed maximum penalty
> on the CPIO of State Bank of India Akola branch.
> >
> > http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_DS_A_2011_000996_T_8044...
> >
> > Interestingly, she also ordered "under section 19 (1)
> (8) (v) of the Act,
> > Commission directs the Head of HRD, State Bank of
> India, Mumbai to provide training on the RTI Act to these
> two officials who are not fit to discharge their duties as
> CPIO and first appellate authority without such training."
> >
> > Let us hope the Public Authority imparts proper
> training from qualified persons and not the usual fly by
> night RTI trainers.
> >
> > Manoj
>