Re: [IAC#RG] STRICTLY PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL

To:

Chief Minister GNCTD

Kind attn: Shri Rajeev Gupta, OSD to CM

Dear Rajeev ji

I had received an email from Shri Kapil Bajaj, a journalist who is well known to Shri Arvind Kejriwal, regarding the liasons" / "bedroom farce" Shri Arvind Kejriwal allegedly had in 2008 with "the present chair of DCW", and which Shri Bajaj claims to have personally witnessed, and which, as per Mr. Bajaj, culminated in "apna aadmi" appointment of the said person as .Chairperson of Delhi Womens Commission.

Mr. Bajaj's allegations are also in the media, eg. NEWGRAM.COM run by a former Aam Aadmi Party volunteer Dr. Munish Raizada

http://www.newsgram.com/who-is-shilpa-her-sexual-affair-with-arvind-kejriwal-former-journalist-colleague-kapil-bajaj-raises-question/

Since Shri Bajaj has not named the individual in this alleged "sexual affair" with Mr. Kejriwal, but has only written to me (through his email) that it is the present chair of DCW, I am in a quandary considering that the statutory RTI disclosure of Delhi Govt mentions that Smt. Barkha Singh is Chairperson of DCW, the copy of which was emailed by me to CM Delhi's email ID earlier but no reply was received.

In the meantime, a lady one Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind is claiming in public to be the Chairperson of Delhi Women's Commission and has leveled serious allegations by innuendo seemingly against Dr. Harsh Vardhan, Union Minister of Science and Technology, who is inter-alia the BJP's Member of Parliament for the constituency where GB Road brothels are situated.

In these circumstances, I would be highly obliged if Delhi Govt locates and provides me by close of work today the gazette notifications or orders related to the appointment of present Chairperson and members of the Delhi Women's Commission. In the absence of such notification from GNCTD I shall presume that Smt. Barkha Singh is the present DCW chair and I shall be contacting her directly concerning Mr. Bajaj's allegations.

Alternatively, Hon'ble Chief Minister may kindly direct whoever is the Chairperson of Delhi Women's Commission to publicly name the "Union Minister and important Delhi-based leader of a national party" who is allegedly the patron of the GB Road prostitution brothels as was alleged at a widely reported press conference held by Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind on or about 22.Sept.2016, again widely reported.

http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/dcw-chief-swati-maliwal-sex-racket-gb-road-union-minister/

I have reason to believe and am aggrieved that these allegations by innuendo directed seemingly at Dr. Harsh Vardhan are at the instance (so-called "credible lead") of one Shri Ashutosh Gupta, National spokesperson of Aam Aadmi Party, who lost to Shri Harsh Vardhan in the last Lok Sabha elections.and who bears a grudge against Dr. Harsh Vardhan. Mr. Ashutosh is the same lunatic person who publicly alleged that my deceased relative was in a sexual affair with Mr. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and I say that Mr. Ashtosh Gupta has no credibility whatsoever.

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor

India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony

New Delhi 110024

On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Kapil Bajaj

Thanks for your prompt reply.

1) The only other recipient of my email is Arvind Kejriwal <cmdelhi@...>, I would therefore be obliged if my communication is not circulated.

2) I conveyed the "imputations" as I understood it. beginning with " .. recounts an incident in Kejriwal's liaison with a young woman who now chairs a statutory body of his government.".

3) Since Arvind, and apparently everybody who has worked for him, habitually believes in writing fiction and passing off fiction as fact <see annexure-1), I am highly aggrieved that Ashutosh chose to make scandalous imputations concerning my relative and he was not immediately dismissed from Arvind's party. It is no defence that Ashutosh, being a professional journalist like you, slightly altered the name of the fermale through years of professional experience.

4) As per you, the "relationship" was "informal" and involved an episode you witnessed "Behind closed door" and described inter-alia in the following language "It was an extraordinary sight. .. The Ramon Magsaysay award winning 'social activist,' whom I had witnessed being feted in Kochi the other day for promoting transparency, was engaged in some kind of secret bedroom farce with his own young colleague. "

5) Arvind Kejriwal is a public figure who voluntarily joined politics and fought elections. If the result of those elections permits him to appoint meritless people only because they are "related" to him, then I (as a citizen of India and elector of Delhi) have every right to question him directly, and I shall do so. Arvind is equally free to choose not to reply and I look forward to seeing which officer his efficient OSD will forward my email/s to this time.

sincerely,

Sarbajit Roy

Mob : +91-8010205897

On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Kapil Bajaj <bajajk74@gmail.com> wrote:

Whoever is the recipient of Sarbajit Roy's mail,

1. My article, 'My Stint with Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and
'Social Activism,' does not use the phrases "sexual relationship,"
"at night," or name "Swati Maliwal," nor did I use these phrases and
the name in any interaction with Sarbjit Roy.

2. I never told Sarbjit Roy that I am "saddened by the way politics
seems to have affected you".

3. I never "asked" Sarbjit Roy to contact "you" directly concerning my "piece".

kapil


On 09/10/2016, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> *To*:
> Shri Arvind Kejriwal
> Chief Minister of Delhi
>
> *PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL*
>
> Dear Arvind
>
> I am receiving reports from various places that one of your close
> associates in PCRF has very recently imputed in public domain that you are
> / were in a sexual relationship with Swati Maliwal. Incidentally Swati
> Maliwal is now the Chairperson of the Delhi Commission for Women after you
> recommended her for the post and you publicly denied she was related to
> you.
>
> Accordingly, I have contacted the author of the piece (*My Stint with
> Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and 'Social Activism'*), and he
> reiterates his allegations that in November 2008 he observed you in a close
> position and sharing a bed with Ms. Maliwal behind locked doors in a guest
> house at night, despite that.all of you had separate rooms. The author has
> also written in the same piece that he observed you giving Ms. Maliwal
> large denomination notes (currency) when she requested it.
>
> I am sure that you would be aware of what I am alluding to, however, I can
> supply a copy of the piece if you need it.
>
> I would hope/expect that you swiftly rebut / nip these claims made by your
> associate. To me at least, and you know that I am highly sceptical of
> people who make such allegations with thin or no evidence, there appears to
> be some prima-facie veracity in the detailed circumstances and motives
> narrated by this 'public spirited' author who, like me, is saddened by the
> way politics seems to have affected you.
>
> *NB*: I am highly offended that Ashutosh contines as National Spokesperson
> for your party after he publicly insulted my ancestor Ms. Sarlaa (Debi)
> Chaudhurani by baselessly alleging she was in a sexual relationship with
> Gandhi. I am again requesting you to throw him out.
>
> I look forward to some action with 48-72 hours, ie. till Dusshera.
>
> *PS*: I am bcc'ing a copy of this email to the author of the piece, since

> he has asked me to contact you directly concerning his piece.
>
> sincerely / warmly,
>
>
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Mob: +91-8010205897
>

--
http://kbforyou.blogspot.in/