Re: [IAC#RG] Whither "rule of law" in AAP

Dear Sir, I am a continuous reader of all your valuable post without any doubt and biasedness with anybody. I am a simple volunteer of IAC and have been a part of most calls from this platform for various agenda's at various occasions since 2010, there was a time when I also supported AAP but I never joined it because it is in the nature of max volunteers of IAC not to become a political. In today's scenario it further strengthens the importance of being a part of IAC and it's credit goes to you and your ideology for the causes of mass population of this beloved country, our motherland, I am thankful and salutes all comrades of IAC and feels happy of being a part (without not doing much for IAC) because you never gave any such responsibility personally to me, truth may be that of not to be so brilliant in your eyes but still assures for my support whenever needed for IAC. Jai Hind!

Sent from my iPhone

> On 30-Mar-2015, at 2:08 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Comdre. Rai,
>
> We would not have said anything, if so many ex-IAC persons from Anna
> anshan days and from outside Delhi had not spoken to us wanting to
> know who to believe. We held our peace and didn't favour either side -
> as you know both sides have extreme and irreconcilliable positions and
> are equally "power mad".
>
> Sir, due to your busy golfing schedule you may not recall what I had
> written about Bhushan's last year on this very list, so I shall repost
> it since it was based on a SC judgement at the time.
>
> THAT the entire AAP GANG - starting from Bhushan and Bhushan - are
> "stool pigeons of Reliance".
> http://rti4citizens.blogspot.in/2014/05/re-iacrg-fwd-arvind-kejriwal-in-jail.html
>
> Accordingly, IAC will continue to have goodwill towards one and all.
> Many AAP workers from both AK-67 and PB-YY-0 are on this list, and we
> factor. their comments into ours.Our list is a valuable public
> resource, and many debates here have had impact where / when it was
> needed.
>
> As per me, Arvind's real problem right now is how to see the the
> corruption of some of his ministers - eg "Mr. YUFENG" do not affect
> his personal credibility and image, and Arvind should not refer to
> their scandalous (mis)deeds in his widely reported speech as examples
> of good governance. Such simple mistakes can come back and "peeche se
> laat maarke" boomerang on Arvind himself.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Sarbajit
>
>> On 3/30/15, Ranjit Rai <ranjitrai123@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear SARBAJIT,
>>
>> Politely, please look after IAC and desist to judge others with CONS and
>> show IAC rise and action to get support as Kejri did and do study the
>> games the trio played FURTHER. Political power was their aim.
>>
>> And why THEY did not help in the hard work in Elections and senior Bhushan
>> wanted to wish AAP ill, father and son in unison ? .
>>
>> Best to IAC I do support.
>>
>> RR
>>
>>
>> Cmde(R) Ranjit B Rai MBIM(UK)
>> Ex Vice President Indian Maritime Foundation
>> International Correspondent India Strategic & SEAGULL B'Caster
>> C 443/377 Defence Colony New Delhi 110024
>> www.indiadefenceforum.com
>> 24330087 +9810066172
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 29 March 2015 at 22:02, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear IAC-ians
>>>
>>> Although IAC and AAP leadership had variously agreed in various ways
>>> not to interfere in each others affairs, the recent unsavory media
>>> clashes in AAP are tarnishing IAC's reputation causing us to update
>>> our subscribers.
>>>
>>> Accordingly, here are our working thoughts on AAP's affairs and
>>> considering that we recently met so many former IAC volunteers from
>>> all over India who had come to attend AAP's National Council meeting
>>> held at a posh farmhouse motel of one of their distinctly 'not aam
>>> aadmi' MLAs.
>>>
>>> Unlike PB and YY, our own bonafides 'qua' AAP are unimpeachable as we had
>>> a) publicly declared our outrage at Kiran Bedi's CMship and made sure
>>> she was defeated,
>>> b) We had publicly declared before the voting our reasons "Why BJP
>>> must be defeated tomorrow."
>>>
>>> PROS
>>>
>>> 1) It is clear that at the present time there is pretty much nobody
>>> except Arvind as the "face" of the party.
>>>
>>> 2) That Arvind has shown remarkable good sense in finally expelling
>>> certain people who do not conform to the party's Constitutional
>>> requirements of upholding the unity and sovereignty of India. We would
>>> not have waited so long or put up with such indiscipline.
>>>
>>> 3) That Arvind's public statement to implement RTI in the party, if
>>> true although many doubt it, is highly welcome and commendable.
>>>
>>> 4) That AAP's MLA seem to be closing ranks and are not interested in
>>> breaking this Govt for now.
>>>
>>> 5) That AAP is focused on Delhi and is presently avoiding interfering
>>> in regional parties / elections of States like Bihar, WB etc which
>>> have large, mainly illegal, populations in Delhi.
>>>
>>> 6) Arvind is paying lip service to development work in Delhi and
>>> making it a model city.
>>>
>>> 7) Arvind has publicly declared he will take on Modi, Vadra and Ambani
>>> and all communal forces and also reduce water and electricity bills by
>>> half by April. We shall hold him to it and roast him if he runs away
>>> as he is prone to doing.
>>>
>>> CONS
>>>
>>> 1) The manner in which these expulsions were done left a lot to be
>>> desired.
>>>
>>> 2) The Party's Constitution was apparently violated at every step and
>>> turn.
>>>
>>> 3) There is a distinct lack of accountability and transparency inside
>>> the party, and the parties internal bodies and apparatus are not being
>>> put in - or allowed to function.
>>>
>>> 4) There are some very unsavoury persons now inducted as part of the
>>> "win at all costs" strategy thrust upon Arvind by his hidden handlers.
>>>
>>> 5) The manner in which Arvind declared his vote bank considerations
>>> and panders to MLAs in his speech, rather than focusing on governance.
>>>
>>> 6) The brainwashed personality cultist culture which Arvind proudly
>>> promotes internally now enforced by bouncers, and with easy money and
>>> easier women now flowing everywhere inside the party.
>>>
>>> 7) There is thus no place for old-school activists and "Jantar Mantar"
>>> idealists in the party. Which may not be such a bad thing if one has
>>> to do "governance" and getting on with "development".
>>>
>>> Sarbajit
>>> National Convenor IAC
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in