Re: [IAC++] Ms. Medha Patkar

This is classic case where we Indians start making person bigger than the issue.

Whoever, whatever that persons credibility and past, if the issue is correct then there should be no problem.

Even Valmiki was a goon before he became Valmiki. He even started taking the wrong name (ulta naam jape bhagwana, balmiki bhaye sant samana), but since the issue in his mind and his intention was good, he attained Rama.

Infact if somebody is trying to make the person bigger/smaller, he/she is weakening the issue.

Aside to Mayank, whatever they say about you, however cheap the comments become, it is not going to change anything. People who know you know that all this is baseless and intentions of people indulging in this mudslinging is questionable.

Raunak Maheshwari

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:52 PM, MRCI - Ramesh Patil <mrciin@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

Acrimonious corresponendence is non productiveand no relevence to IAC -Is IAC regd body with Charity Commissioner?Why it's so autocratic ?We stopped attending after witnessing the the attitude and style of som called not elected or self appointed convenors Members/Numbers of attendees dwindled-rate of attrition is 70 to 8o% Clearly shows the ilack of nterest and general apathy .Staying in paid Media does not pay inlong run.-what's the real reason of split in IAC-May be personal agenda of a few chosen who likes to be in dim /lime light .Who is Manish sisodia  and Vishwas?What is their past record-Has anyone checked their backgrounds-.Atleast Kiran Bedi Prashant. shanti Bhushan  and Arvind Kejriwal's life is open book.Rest of them need introduction to Aam adami

Good Luck

 

 

RAMESH PATIL

MRCI

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: iac@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Monday, 19 November 2012 9:57 PM

Subject: Re: [IAC++] Ms. Medha Patkar

Dear Mayank

I am not the one planning to put up a political party and beg (or buy with liquor bottles)  votes from the public.

Unsubscribing from a mailing list is a purely automatic operation. You should try it. It works.

Your own people in Mumbai are busy circulating that Ajay Dixit is Shivendra Singh Chauhan. I can't comment on such operational things since I occupy a purely ceremonial and decorative Honorary post like ex-CJI P.N.Bhagwati did as RMOF's President. In any case I don't know Mr.Chauhan and have never spoken to him. He seems to be an Anna bhakt.

It seems IAC-Mumbai organised a meeting on 22.Feb.2011 where RTI activists Krishnaraj Rao, Praful Vora etc was present. What went wrong after that ? Do all of you work for different land mafias ? Why does Krishnaraj attempt to connect ROMF/LOK to the Thakeray family ? Why does he say that the modus operandi used by Lok Group and all the associated Builder concerns with similar sounding names is identical to that used by Robert Vadra with DLF, pyramiding with cheques et.al (indicative of huge black money components)  ?

From what I can see, builders need vast chunks of prime land with clear titles, and they are prepared to pay anyone handsomely who can deliver it to them. Its called land-banking and you were an active component of this business through ROMF.

IAC can carry on with their ostrich policy of avoiding replying to inconvenient queries for as long as they want.

As far as I am concerned I don't like complex questions or answers. A straight yes or no will do. Can you answer a few elementary questions on behalf of your associates ?

1) Is the evidence Arvind and Prashant gathered and released about Robert Vadra+DLF sufficient to initiate prosecution against any wing of any government?

2) Has anything been done about it, has any culprit stepped down or penalties taken place ?

3) Why is IAC-Mumbai so incompetent when it comes to prosecution and redressal ?

The only reason I am asking this is that when an incident took place in which I was aggrieved along with millions of other people (the so-called 1-G scam), I got out the information in 14 days, the Union Minister concerned resigned 6 days after that and within 3 months the Govt recovered over 4,000 crores in penalty, licence fees and  fines.  And this was all done without media or publicity.

When efficient individuals can clean the system, NGOs really have no business standing in our way.

Warmly

Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption.

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:22 AM, <mayankgandhi04@gmail.com> wrote:

So, as expected, you are the one behind the so-called ajay dixit. Deepak parekh, sukhtankar were part of ROMF in the initial days, but they left due to their preoccupation (that's what the resignation letter says). Many individuals left and many more joined, as happens in movements like this. Am sure thosands have left your email group and thousands like me would like to, but the unsubscription doesn't work. There were over 50 associations and NGOs associated with RoMF where I was working as a secretary. To link a dastardlty attack by someone on Nayana Kathpalia to me is so cheap(so typical of you). No one has ever even suggested that. You need some serious medical help.

Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/

Post: iac@lists.riseup.net
Quit: iac-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net
Help: http://help.riseup.net/lists/

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: iac@lists.riseup.net
Quit: iac-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net
Help: http://help.riseup.net/lists/