Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Missing requests in the CIC

Mr. Makkar is lying when he says that SGPC has not appointed any CPIOs
The SGPC has appointed CPIO on CIC's order of 28 March 2011 and has
also provided the demanded information
I did not write the name of CPIO on the application. I simply wrote CPIO, SGPC
Keeping in view the above background I feel that I have not made any
false statement
to CIC


On 8/2/12, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sandeep
>
> 1) Is Mr. Makkar lying when he says that SGPC has not appointed any
> CPIOs ?
>
> 2) What is the action, if any, the SGPC has taken on CIC's order of
> 28 March 2011 in "Kuldeep Singh Khaira" where IC(MLS) has found /
> declared SGPC to be a P/A ?
>
> 3) How did you FILE your RTI if SGPC has not appointed any PIOs ? In
> fact IC(MLS) gave SGPC Amritsar 6 weeks time to do so, ie by 13 May
> 2011. Your RTI request was allegedly filed on 26 May 2011. So can you
> name the CPIO you filed with ?
>
> 4) In background of point 3 above , Have you given a false statement
> to CIC that you have FILED your RTI request to CPIO of SGPC ?
>
> Please clarify specifically and dont confuse these points with other
> issues (which we can discuss separately).
>
> THE ISSUE HERE IS OF ORDERS OF CIC (to appoint CPIO + FAA) NOT BEING
> COMPLIED WITH.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Aug 2, 5:23 am, Sandeep gupta <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sir,
>> makkar sahib is telling lies. He knows that if they started divulging
>> information, a large number of bigwigs of his political party will
>> face music.
>> I did not make any statement to the cic. I simply made a complaint cum
>> appeal for no reply to applications sent to the cpio.
>> I had asked for accounts of one guru ram das medical hospital trust
>> (under sgpc). simultaneously a different rti was filed with spio of
>> the trust. the commission held that trust is a p/a. Now the matter is
>> pending in High court and the hearing is scheduled in last week of
>> august. in the high court, the trust has stated that it is not
>> receiving any funding from sgpc or any government (though it has
>> received 80 crore rupees and free land from panchayats and income tax
>> exemption)
>>
>> On 8/1/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Dear Sandeep
>>
>> > 1) HOW did you file your RTI with the SGPC's PIO ??? FYI, teh
>> > President of SGPC some Mr. Makkar.says they are not under RTI and have
>> > not taken any steps to appoint a PIO.
>>
>> >http://worldsikhnews.com/new%20stories/Is%20SGPC%20covered%20under%20...
>>
>> > I assume you must have simply sent an IPO or DD for Rs. 10 with your
>> > application by post ???
>>
>> > If so, you have made a wrong statement to the CIC - instead you should
>> > have asked for a PIO to be appointed. Also, since the SIC (Punjab) (as
>> > per media reports) has already held SGPC to be a P/A, why are you
>> > approaching CIC ?
>>
>> >http://www.rtifoundationofindia.com/should-religious-trusts-be-within...
>>
>> > Sarbajit
>>
>> > On 8/1/12, Sandeep gupta <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> sir, Please tell me whether last line as suggested can be written in
>> >> first appeal. or you have written in lighter vein?
>>
>> >> On 7/31/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Dear Bimal
>>
>> >>> Anna Hazare has already apologised to the people of India for the
>> >>> irresponsible statement that PM MMS was a Shikhandi made by his team
>> >>> member Prashant Bhushan.
>> >>>http://ibnlive.in.com/news/we-apologise-for-shikhandi-remark-team-ann...
>>
>> >>> OTH, Prashant Bhushan denies making that remark to the same channel
>> >>>http://ibnlive.in.com/news/prashant-bhushan-denies-calling-pm-a-shikh...
>>
>> >>> So AT LEAST one of them is a liar.
>>
>> >>> Sarbajit
>>
>> >>> On 7/31/12, Trap Rti <rtit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> The corrupt babus has over powered the system in our contry
>> >>>> and some of our friends plays SHIKHANDI
>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:12 AM, C K Jam <rtiwan...@yahoo.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> Mr Sarbajit,
>>
>> >>>>> There is no systemic error in the CICs centralised receipts section
>> >>>>> and the rest of the administrative set up.
>> >>>>> It is a complete breakdown and a hijacking of the system by a few
>> >>>>> vested interests in the CIC !
>>
>> >>>>> RTIwanted
>>
>> >>>>>   ------------------------------
>> >>>>> *From:* sarbajit roy <sroy...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>> *To:* "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005"
>> >>>>> <
>> >>>>> HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
>> >>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 29, 2012 8:33 PM
>> >>>>> *Subject:* [HumJanenge] Re: Missing requests in the CIC
>>
>> >>>>> Dear Sandeep
>>
>> >>>>>  It also points to some systemic error in the CIC's
>> >>>>> Centralised dak and registry systems.
>> >>>>> .
>> >>>>> Sarbajit
>>
>> >> --
>> >> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>> >> 1722, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>> >> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>> 1722, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>


--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
1722, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181