Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Another blunder of Anita Gupta

Dear Girish

I must presume that Anita Gupta has faithfully recorded your exact RTI
queries of 21.05.2012 in her Appellate order.

NOW you claim that there are portions (marked in RED COLOUR by you) to
your queries which she has left out from her order.

OTH, if these RED colour portions are figments of YOUR imagination
which you expect a PIO and/or FAA to magically divine from the deeply
fevered recesses of your mind, then even Lord Krisha (aka Mr. Nitish
Bharadwaj ex-MP) cannot help you.

Also, nowhere in her order has she recorded that you are highlighting
case number CIC/SM/A/001791/SG/17637which is in the Moneylife article.
Nowhere is Aakashdeep's case mentioned - did you SPECIFICALLY ask for
it ?

To settle this matter once and for all, we would appreciate that you
mail a copy of your actual RTI request of 21.May.2012 to this group.

Sarbajit

On 7/25/12, Girish Mittal <rtng.mittal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sarbjeet,
>
> Perhaps your understanding of law is different from my understanding...and
> thanks for branding me "unfortunate"...But if you had certified me as
> "untouchable", I would have had access to some more facilities from Bharat
> sarkar..Anyways...
>
> My contention is simple..I had highlighted a case published on Moneylife
> http://goo.gl/lX7qm It is registered as CIC/SM/A/001791/SG/17637
>
> Now look at queries in the said RTI:
>
> (a) Kindly provide case file #s in which CIC has issued show cause
> notices to CPIO,CIC for non provision/delayed provision of
> information..Relevant
> case file is quoted above(although there are several other)
>
> (b) Kindly provide copies of response of CPIO, CIC to those show cause
> notices..Relevant case file is quoted above(although there are several
> other)
>
> (c) Kindly provide information with file notings on cases where
> information is pending to be provided inspite of order of CIC on the
> same...Relevant
> case file is quoted above(although there are several other)
>
> (d) Kindly provide information with file notings on cases where CIC has
> decided to engage services of counsel/advocate to defend on show-cause
> notice(s) issued against CPIO, CIC and/or disclosure of information
> directed by CIC. Kindly provide information on the process by which the
> counsel/advocate(s) were hired and remuneration being paid to them with
> copies of bills/vouchers/challans etc.
>
> The case in which Akashdeep has filed petition in HC.(and many more).
>
> (e) Kindly provide copies of submissions made by CPIO, CIC or appointed
> counsel/advocate alongwith in above mentioned cases before the ICs and file
> notings on the same.
>
> The case in which Akashdeep has filed petition in HC.(and many more).
>
> (f) Kindly provide information with file notings on the cases of
> transfer of bench of cases against CPIO, CIC after the case has been listed
> for hearing with a particular bench or after a show cause noting has been
> issued.
>
> CIC/SM/A/2011/001791/SG/17637..
>
>
> As can be seen from above, the case files readily exist in CIC and the
> difference you are trying to point out in beyond comprehension. I can only
> do telephonic hearing as I cannot come to Delhi for every hearing. That
> day, phone was fully functional, but the call for hearing never came. When
> I tried to call, her # was constantly busy. Perhaps they had kept
> the receiver down for half an hour. Probably she did not want the hearing
> to take place for obvious reasons.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> Girish Mittal
>