- Dear Sarbjeet,
I couldn't resist this one either...
Oh so you have grouse against SG for being made IC and not you??? In that case, you can continue to have your grouse and continue to abuse SG...Looking at quality of reasoned orders of SG, I am sure he must be seeking sound legal advice, certainly not from moribund babus in CIC, who are good for nothing....By the way, you have still not clarified your vested interested in defending the JS/Law running to HC when faced with inquiry..If he was so honest, he would have had faced the inquiry and not ran to DHC to have the inquiry stayed. It is sad to note that Chief Comm Mr. Mishra, saying that it is a trivial matter...
Reg. para 59, i must reproduce the same:
" We make it abundantly clear that the trial court should not be influenced by any observation or finding arrived at by
us in dealing with these appeals as we have not decided the matter on merits of the case"...Which to any reasoned man would mean that the court has not decided on the specific issues involved in the case, but has limited itself to the issue of "ex-parte" stays..As I said earlier, you have an amazing ability to twist the facts...
If you were a man of so high moral values and expert in legal matters, i would challenge to you to file a PIL in SC against the mindless granting of ex parte stays against the orders of CIC by various HCs...Judiciary is greater threat to RTI than CIC...
All the best my friend...
Girish Mittal
- Dear Girish
I am truly disappointed by your reply.
You have shown that you are no better than an "RTI activist" who
struts about until called upon to defend his position, whereupon they
simply run away and claim the moral high ground through the (bought
off) media or controlled groups like HJ-YG .
You stated previously that there is a SC judgment on vacation of
interim stay orders. I was very surprised to learn about this since I
track these things. I asked you for it. You sent me the judgment. I
read it and clearly explained (precisely and legally) why your
conclusions were incorrect.
Now you can only accuse me of twisting words and facts. A a person who
first stepped into the SC in my teens (and have being arguing in
person from that age) I am probably much better suited to interpret SC
judgments (spoken / unspoken) than you are. As somebody who had
assisted over 200 poor persons to successfully secure justice from SC,
I can assure you that I have excellent knowledge of how higher courts
work, and I share this knowledge freely with everyone (I have never
taken a paise from anyone for such social work). It is another matter
that I adopt a highly conservative strategy/interpretation to ensure
that my "win-loss" ratio is excellent, which conservative strategy is
misinterpreted as being pro-Govt. by foolish RTI activists to defame
me.
FYI, I have never been in Govt.
FYI, I have taken on MANY high and mighty persons successfully. For
instance I was instrumental in getting Mr. Pramod Mahajan to resign
from Union Cabinet. The fact that he was from BJP was not relevant for
me.
Insofar as Mr. Gandhi is concerned, my dissatisfaction with him stems
from the incidents of 11-August-2008 and subsequently. I have placed
these facts in public domain on many occasions. On 11-August 2008 at
about 4 PM, Shailesh Gandhi, Arvind Kejriwal, myself and another
person (very well known RTI personality) spoke to each other for quite
some time outside Mr. Habibullah's office in August Kranti Bhawan. The
next month Mr. Gandhi became an IC. SG is not a "soft" person/target -
IMHO he is a weak/morally bankrupt person who was bought off and he is
a disgrace to the RTI users fellowship. He had the chance to redeem
himself in office by his orders. Had he done so I would have been the
first person to let bygones be bygones and supported him. Instead he
carried on in his reckless fashion, ignorant arrogance (very deadly
combination and desire for constant self publicity.
Ball is in your court.
Sarbajit
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.