Re: [HumJanenge] Re: No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.

Dear Karira

My "appreciation' of IC(SS) [NB people had similarly accused me of the
same thing with ANT], has nothing to do with the individual but for
their KNOWLEDGE and APPLICATION of RTI Act.

It seems you have not read / understand section 19 properly.
IC(SS) has no other option but to do what she (and other ICs also) is doing.

Sarbajit

On 3/4/12, C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Mr Sarbajit,
>
> Wow, cannot believe your appreciation of IC(SS) !
>
> I do not know about the "seasoned bureaucrat" part, but she definitely
> passes strange orders as an IC.
>
> Here is a sample:
>
> http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_A_2012_000018_M_77498.pdf
>
>
> The Commission has received second appealdated 24.8.2011 from Shri
> S.R. Yadav, Bikaner, u/s 19 of the RTI Act, 2005..............
> .
> .
> .
>
> 3. The appellant filed first appeal dated 7.4.2011 before appellate
> authority
> & Chairman, Bar Council of Rajasthan, Jodhpur, which was also not decided
> by the appellate authority.
>
> 4. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under the RTI Act, the matter is
> remitted to Appellate Authority & Chairman, Bar Council of
> Rajasthan,
> Jodhpur, with a copy of second appeal, with the following directions:
>
> i) In case the first appeal dated 7.4.2011 has not been disposed of by AA,
> he should dispose of the first appeal by passing a speaking order, after
> hearing the parties in the matter, within two weeks of receipt of this
> order.
> ii) In case AA has already disposed of the first­appeal, he should
> furnish a
> copy of his order to the appellant within one week of receipt of
> this................
>
> ========
>
> (NOTE: There are many more similar ones)
>
> Isn't the CIC the second appellate authority ?
>
> RTIwanted
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005"
> <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2012 7:33 PM
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.
>
> .
> .
> .
>
> IC(SS) is a seasoned bureaucrat, she doesn't make such foolish
> mistakes. If I blindly had to chose between supporting an order of
> hers versus the say of some disgruntled RTI activist, I would chose
> her order any day.
>
> Sarbajit
>
>
>>