[HumJanenge] Re: help regarding writ against orders of the CIC

Dear Sandeep

http://rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SM_C_2011_001237_M_69735.pdf

This is perfectly good order from CIC(SM) and should be emulated by
all other ICs. I don't know why you are upset about it <smile>

Sarbajit

On Nov 20, 6:57 am, sandeep kumar <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> sir,
> I want notice to be issued to PIO for not replying  and to ensure the
> rights of the complainants. as first appeal was already filed, the
> commissioner (in my opinion) erred in ordering the
> complainant/appellant to file first appeal again in response to PIO 's
> order (if any). Why should the complainant/appellant send second
> appeal again?
> regards
>
> On 11/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Dear Sandeep
>
> > What do you want ?
>
> > 1) Information
> > 2) Penalty against PIO
> > 3) To ensure primacy of section 18 over 19 using Writ process
> > 4) All of the above
>
> > If your answer is 4, I suggest you review your assumptions.
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > On 11/19/11, sandeep kumar <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Dear All,
> >> I wish to file a writ petition in Punjab and Haryana high court
> >> against a decision in my case in which instead of deciding the
> >> complaint (against no response by PIO), the CIC directed the PIO to
> >> respond to the application (without issuing of penalty notice) with
> >> intimation of details of FAA,. The complainant was asked to file first
> >> appeal against the order of the PIO if not satisfied. The complainant
> >> was asked to file second appeal again if aggrieved by orders of FAA.
> >> This is a violation of section 18 of the RTI act.
> >> I wish that the members of the group may provide legal grounds for
> >> filing this writ.
>
> >> --
> >> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
> >> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
> >> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>
> --
> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
> Phone: 91-99929-31181