Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Sri Rejimon may kindly explain his nieghbour's affidavit

I leave the judgement on the enlightened members and request to read both the mails and comment.  Comments should include who is indulging in a campaign against the renowned RTI activists.  I am onlyu an humble RTI volunteer.

 

I do not know about the affidavit filed by Mr. K. Rajeshwar Rao but if know, you must also be having a copy of the same and either you or Mr. Rajeshwar will be going a great service to the nation if you disclose the names so that they do not inflict to any damage to the nation.

 

I shall be grateful if you can cite proof of my extending support to the corrupts.

 

You are free to withdraw your greatness of allowing me views freely by expelling me from the group. I do not wish to waste in the spar which will not yield any positive result.

 

---

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, 5 March, 2011 9:15:03 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Sri Rejimon may kindly explain his nieghbour's affidavit

Dear Guptaji

FIRSTLY. If you have a private quarrel with any member please discuss
it outside this group.

Without prejudice to the above, a close reading of Mr Rejimon's reply
shows that he straightway concedes the truth at least 80% of what
Rajeshwar Rao has written. I shall spare you the detailed analysis /
computation which you can do yourself (and which I am ever ready to
provide publicly if you so desire).

Insofar as Mr Rao's post about 300+ RTI activists being tapped etc,
the same has been filed in affidavit in SC and has also been published
in reputed newspapers.

LASTLY.Your outburst is not surprising that you publicly support and
display your love and affection for some of India's most corrupt
persons on this forum. It is our greatness that you are allowed to
freely say such things here.

Sarbajit

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Mr. Rao claims that he lives outside India.  In the past, he claimed that
> many RTI activists (300?) are on the wacth list of the security agencies.
> When I contronted him to disclose the names, there were tens of ablies and
> one was that these will be disclosed by the wikileakes but nothing
> happened.  Once, I remember that the moderators said that Rao has been
> expllled from the group. Moderators are requested not to make this platform
> a place to spread remours and use for slanderious others and for mud
> slining.  Nothing without proof or convincing explaination should be put up
> on the blog either that may be written by me, Mr Sarbajit or any other
> member.  Unlike his name, Sarbajit has failed to win (jit) the confidence of
> members at large.
>