Re: [IAC#RG] CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS

DEAR ALL,

Below is very just and logical.

:-

*"DOCTORS VS JUDGES"*

*Judiciary should also come under CPA (Consumer Protection Act)*

*"Every Body Must READ and SHARE this Article.*     

*In the Salman Khan hit and run case the LOWER court judge and the HIGH court judge had the SAME pieces of EVIDENCE to deal with.*

*They also had the SAME Indian LAW to abide by and most probably they had similar education qualifications too.*

*Yet they INTERPRETED the situation in absolutely CONTRASTING manner and gave verdicts which are poles apart.*

*Just imagine what would have happened if a YOUNG doctor sitting in a GOVERNMENT hospital doctor catering to hundreds of patients in a day had diagnosed a celebrity patient presenting with gastric discomfort as GASTRITIS and another hospital had LATER on diagnosed that patient to be having a MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. I am sure that doctor would have been screwed and jailed.*

*A JUDGE gets YEARS to decide on a case unlike a DOCTOR who is expected to diagnose and treat everything in the BLINK of an eye.*

*If a doctor making a wrong diagnosis can be prosecuted shouldn't a judge giving wrong verdicts meet the same fate?*

*If hospitals can be sued for not admitting poor patients shouldn't the courts be prosecuted for having lacs of impending cases?*

*Is it not appalling that a judge taking 12 years to give a wrong verdict gets away unhurt and a doctor making one mistake is screwed by our legal system?*

*Doctors practice medicine which is more of an art than an exact science whereas law is absolutely 100% manmade, yet doctors are expected to be right on all occasions.*

*If doctors and hospitals have a duty towards the society then does the judiciary not have a responsibility towards the socitey.*

*If there is so much of hue and cry in media about doctors and hospitals charging huge sums from patients then why do we not ever hear a word on the fee that lawyers like Manu singhvi and Jethmalani charge for their court appearances.*

*Government often talks about putting a capping on the fees doctors charge for various procedures but their is no talk of putting a capping on the fee that these lawyers charge to get justice for their clients.*

*If health is a citizen's right then so is justice. Shall we take our minds off worshipping false heroes & think?*

*#JUDICIARY SHOULD ALSO COME UNDER CPA (CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT)#*

Regards, PB.

Sent from my iPhone

On 13-Aug-2016, at 7:38 PM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:

To

India Against Corruption      

                                                   CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW  RESTRAINT IN  HIS OBSERVATIONS

 

In open court, Chief Justice of India has accused central government of bringing the entire judiciary to a "grinding halt" by sitting on the recommendations of the collegium for appointment and transfer of judges to high courts across the country. It is disturbing that he went to the extent of saying that the court would not shy away from a confrontation with the government, if driven to a corner.  He made such remarks even when the Attorney General assured that the issue would be taken up at the highest level.

Even while the Chief Justice made such sharp remarks, the law minister has said that  appointment of number of judges would be finalized very soon. Is Chief Justice not aware of this?

The collegium issue has been under discussions for quite sometime now and many have questioned the judges themselves appointing the judges , when several judges at various levels have been caught in corruption scandals with one former Chief Justice of India himself  being one of the accused.

Government stand appears  to be that there must be proper procedure and transparency in selection of judges. There is nothing wrong with this view. 

 Chief Justice rejects the government's view and insists that he should have the final say. This stand of the Chief Justice is the origin of the confrontation.

It would have been appropriate if Chief Justice has read the mood of the people, who are increasingly not sure about  the caliber of some of the judges.

Reflecting such public mood , he should accept the need for a level of transparency in the appointment of judges. Threat of confrontation by Chief Justice is not in tune with the functioning  of the judiciary.

 

N.S.Venkataraman

Nandini Voice for The Deprived

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Sent from my iPhone

On 19-Aug-2016, at 1:31 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:

19/8/16

This holier than thou attitude of the Chief justice is not helpful. It clearly negates any suggestion for improvement in the working of the judiciary. Corruption is not an issue for him. Suggestion that there should be court of Appeals in metropolitan cities like Chennai ,Calcutta and Mumbai is not acceptable to him. Commercial courts for Govt. litigation is not being implemented.Gram Panchayats and alternative fora to ease the pendency is not being implemented.Regds  

---

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 7:38 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS

 

To

India Against Corruption      

                                                   CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW  RESTRAINT IN  HIS OBSERVATIONS

 

In open court, Chief Justice of India has accused central government of bringing the entire judiciary to a "grinding halt" by sitting on the recommendations of the collegium for appointment and transfer of judges to high courts across the country. It is disturbing that he went to the extent of saying that the court would not shy away from a confrontation with the government, if driven to a corner.  He made such remarks even when the Attorney General assured that the issue would be taken up at the highest level.

Even while the Chief Justice made such sharp remarks, the law minister has said that  appointment of number of judges would be finalized very soon. Is Chief Justice not aware of this?

The collegium issue has been under discussions for quite sometime now and many have questioned the judges themselves appointing the judges , when several judges at various levels have been caught in corruption scandals with one former Chief Justice of India himself  being one of the accused.

Government stand appears  to be that there must be proper procedure and transparency in selection of judges. There is nothing wrong with this view.

 Chief Justice rejects the government's view and insists that he should have the final say. This stand of the Chief Justice is the origin of the confrontation.

It would have been appropriate if Chief Justice has read the mood of the people, who are increasingly not sure about  the caliber of some of the judges.

Reflecting such public mood , he should accept the need for a level of transparency in the appointment of judges. Threat of confrontation by Chief Justice is not in tune with the functioning  of the judiciary.

 

N.S.Venkataraman

Nandini Voice for The Deprived

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in