RE: [IAC#RG] Complaint of FRAUD played on WiFi stakeholders by GoNCTD

2/5/14

Dear Mr. Jain,

We are not on this forum to enjoy' in the situations' as you term it. We are trying to make sense of the political motives behind the Govt. policies and programmes and how they are going to affect the common man/AAM Admi/ Mago people, specially of Central Govt. and by extention Delhi State Govt.
AAP made a number of promises to the electorate and got elected by an overwhelming majority. WIFI is one of those promises.

This should have a low priority compared to promises for schools, colleges, employment, water and electricity. But surprisingly WIFI has got the first priority and Mr.S. Roy being involved in Delhi developments for a long time specially after IAC,s 2011 JanAndholan, is following WIFI developments closely. It is in that context I made the observation that, 1. The Chief Minister administering oath of secrecy to Parliamentary secretary is not correct as the power should vest in the Lt. Governor. 2.Likewise it appears that to keep the flock togather, the Chief Minister has appionted 2/3 Parliamentary secretaries. So what the duties,powers and privileges of those MLAs as parliamentariey secretarys- is a legitimate question. Ultimately will all these lead to corruption is the legitimate concern of IAC

Regarding farmers plight, Mr.Vekataram had posted his views about a week a back. Surprisingly there is no comment or views expressed so far. That is the lip service we pay to the farming community.

JKGaur

---

Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:59:14 +0530
From: anil.jain@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Complaint of FRAUD played on WiFi stakeholders by GoNCTD

For get about the role in WiFi dear interest holders, please focus on main issued relating to farmers and Common Bhartiya men. You have written more on the role in WiFi than anything else. I think even this forum is operation only for personal interest like any other politician.

I cant Enjoy in this situation!!

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:

29/4/15

Oath of office and secrecy can be administered by the Governor not the Chief Minister .

If each Minister has 2/3 Parliamentary Secretary,their functions,powers etc. need to be defined.

Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:53:05 +0530
From: sroy.mb@gmail.com
To: csdelhi@nic.in; secyit@nic.in
CC: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net; ncpri@googlegroups.com
Subject: [IAC#RG] Complaint of FRAUD played on WiFi stakeholders by GoNCTD

To:
The Hon'ble Chief Secretary of Delhi
 
By EMAIL
 
Sub:  Complaint of FRAUD played on WiFi stakeholders by GoNCTD
 
Dear Sir,
 
I refer to my earlier complaint about role of Mr. Adarsh Shastri, MLA,
in conducting the WIFI stakeholders consultations between 24-27th
April 2015.
 
I also refer to the PRESS RELEASE titled as "Delhi Chief Minister
administers oath of office and secrecy to newly appointed
Parliamentary Secretaries" dated as 27.04.2015. It seems this was done
post lunch on 27.April.2015 but you can confirm the same from official
records.
 
In these circumstances I request to be provided complete information
as to how Shri Adarsh Shastri participated as, and was also permitted
to participate as, "Parliamentary Secretary to Minister IT" during the
3 day conference / stakeholders consultation on WIFI in Delhi, when he
had not been administered any oath of office and secrecy till then. It
is not clear to me how papers I had submitted to Secy/IT as part of a
government consultation process could be disclosed to Mr. Adarsh
Shastri or how any recommendation could be passed on WIFI in Delhi
without considering my submissions or how Mr Shastri could even
communicate with me officially.
 
I reiterate that apparently Mr. Shastri was deliberately inserted into
the WIFI decision making process by somebody without any authority,
and so as to ensure that my submissions are not considered. It is
pertinent that there is no information whatsoever on Delhi Govt
website about powers, source of powers, job and scope of
"Parliamentary Secretary" which I could easily locate.
 
I would also request you to inquire into the circumstances whereby a
Wifi task force has been formed in a completely opaque and
non-transparent manner involving persons with dubious antecedents. In
the alternative you may kindly ensure that all relevant records of
Delhi Dialogue Commission for the Delhi-wide WIFI scheme are made
public so that I may pursue this under vigilance angles.
 
I again urge that the WIFI consultation process has been vitiated, and
needs to be properly conducted 'de-novo' with full prior disclosure
and transparency maintained throughout.
 
Sincerely
 
 
Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
 
Tel : 8010205897

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in