Sunday, March 1, 2015

Re: [IAC#RG] Court pendency behind India's low global ranking: World Bank

Same here.
Of late, we have had some arrests / jails for a very few babus and netas. It is now overdue to put there a few of the bad apples in judiciary.

--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 2/28/15, Holiday Bash International <lidder.hbi@gmail.com> wrote:

Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Court pendency behind India's low global ranking: World Bank
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Date: Saturday, February 28, 2015, 12:33 AM

It
is really surprising that law made for common man is
actually not giving any relief to him . Ours is a simple
case we want co-op society and builder does not want and
made condiminium with all control with him . He managed the
Co-op hos soc registrar .We went to Bombay High Court the
builder with his muscle power managed there aslo . In fact
If there was a CCTV in the court I would have put it on You
tube to see how a High Court judge does not even gives a min
to hear our complain leave beside allow any argument . He
had come with a predecieded order and gave that a four lines
order WP is dismisssed .

This took us 4 years and now we
plan to approach the supreme court we donot know how long
that will take .
And
this is happeneing where we have a constitulay right to form
societies

God
save this country and Country men
Amarjit
Pune

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015
at 7:33 AM, Chandrasekhar P <chandrasekharadv@gmail.com>
wrote:
True. Supreme court is meant to decide cases
involving constitutional law or substantial questions of law
of general importance. But  we see  it deciding questions
of facts making it the final court of fact which was never
intended by the framers of the constitution.
On 27 Feb 2015 12:13,
"SURESHAN P" <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
wrote:
Have you anybody recollect the turnaround in
Gujarati teestas anticipatory bail case. At the time when
the case listed before a bench headed by justice
Mukhopadyaya, court, insisted the petitioner to surrender
and apply for regular bail. Ex minister kapil sibal,
appeared for the petitioner, used his clout and managed to
adjourn the case. Subsequent event was dramatic as letter
sent to cj and he, violating all procedural practices,
directed to list the matter before another bench. New bench
took a totally different view and granted protection to the
petitioners.                                       
1)just imagine whether this is possible in a common
man's
case?                                         
2) only people who CAN ENGAGE KAPIL SIBAL like lawyer can
achieve this kind of
milestone.                                        
This is happening because of discretionary powers given by
statute. That is why litigants are spending in lakhs for
engaging big seniors even though no serious questions of law
involved or no need of lengthy arguments. Face value matters
in such cases.  this is a biggest cheating of justice
system which nobody likes to recognise. Removing any kind
discretionary power to judges will improve the system. It is
not impossible to adopt a standard rules for every kind of
bail matters. Same court in same case coming with different
opinions will not happen in such circumstances
On Feb 26, 2015 7:04
PM, "P. A. Pouran" <advpouran@gmail.com>
wrote:
Dear
All, If the 'Vacation System' is abolished, we
can have some relief.

On Wednesday, 25 February 2015, Boompelli Venkatrao <boompellivenkatrao@gmail.com>
wrote:
I am
71 my case of land aquisation case for RTC at Karimnagar is
pending At AP High Court for the last 20 years, when it will
come to bench I do not know

On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Gopalarao Rao <gvgrao33@gmail.com> wrote:
It is quite
correctMy case is pending in the Highcourt for
the last eight years and I am now 82 and I don't know
whether I can see the judgement before I die .

Sent from my iPad
On Feb 22, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Chandrasekhar P <chandrasekharadv@gmail.com> wrote:

" Large
pendency of cases in Indian courts and non-implementation of
judicial reforms have been cited by the World Bank as one of
the key reasons for India's low rank on the Bank's
Index of 'Ease of Doing Business" says TOS.
How can this be true ? Most of the business
disputes are now resolved through arbitration. Most
recoveries of banks financial institutions are done through
SARFASI proceedings.  The pendency is mostly in litigation
involving stakes of common people. This appears to be the
case in SC as well. Where is the cause for worry for the
Business ?


Post:
"indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


--
Thanks & Regards
P.A Pouran


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Holiday Bash
International.
Pune,
India
Tel  :
+91-20-66015020
Fax :
+91-20-26055158
Mob :
+91-9423582779; 9823012276
http://holidaybash.net
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Holiday-Bash-International/114429708650682
Alternate E-mail
contact@holidaybash.net

Enjoy a Unique Travel
Experience With Us

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.