That is the reason how Judiciary works up to High Court level. They adjust themselves with Advocates and Single party . They do not concern Justice !! They make out money out if it!!
Ordinary person can not go to Supreme Court and there is no person tom look in to the matter up to High Court Level!!! They cherish the fruits of tree who planted by the litigant!!!!
Ordinary person can not go to Supreme Court and there is no person tom look in to the matter up to High Court Level!!! They cherish the fruits of tree who planted by the litigant!!!!
This is what I have observed. I can given names of the Judges/ Justices and Advocates also.Shah D J
On Monday, 3 November 2014 6:35 AM, Gopalarao Rao <gvgrao33@gmail.com> wrote:
In many cases the judgement delivered when one or all parties expire. Such delays are just commanplace. Can the judges see these facts and expedite the judgements?
Sent from my iPadGranting of bail to the accused person on medical grounds may be ok but what is needed in our judial system is speedy justice. Why should the courts takes years and years to deliver the judgement. It is defeating the very purpose of jistice. Judial sustem needs improvement.M.Y. ThoteOn Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:22 AM, P.Mohana Chandran <p.mohanachandran50@gmail.com> wrote:Mrs.Indira Gandhi's election was set aside by Allahabad High Court for electoral malpractice.Justice Krishna Iyer,granted stay of the judgement.This facilitated Mrs Gandhi to get the Representation of Peoples' Act amended with retrospective effect so that spending money over and above the stipulated limit even by a recognised party which was an electoral malpractice ceased to be a malpractice resulting in the Allahabad High Court judgement getting reversed.We cannot rule out the possibility of the Prevention of Corruption Act getting amended excluding members of Legislatures from the clutches of the law.As Lalluji.Jayalalithaji and OmPrkash Choutalaji are presently not able to 'remote control' the Central Government, Prevention of Corruption Act may not be amended to save them.They may have to work out their remedy before the Appellate Courts.If a politician receives gifts and become a Billionaire with such gifts,he can not be proceeded under Prevention of Corruption Act in view of the change in law brought in to save some Big politicians who were able to remote control the then Government at the Centre.Till the accused persons (whether politician or otherwise) exhaust the last chance of Appeal,let us not treat them as criminal.In Tamilnadu there is objection to to keeping of Jayalalithaji's portraits in public offices.As per the existing guidelines portraits of some leaders like Gandhiji,Arinjar Anna and serving CM can be kept in public Offices.TN Government can amend the guidelines to include former CMs in the list so that the controversy can be avoided.Ofcourse Karunanidhiji's portrait too can be kept in such a situation.As a person born and living in Tamilnadu ,I am extremely happy that Jayalalithaji was allowed to comeout on bail.When she was in Jail,each day was a nightmare for us.P.Mohana Chandran,On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:Even though there is no presumption of innocence after conviction so long as an appeal provided by law due to experience of coviction being found to be erroneous in many cases there is no presumption of guilt also and therefore grant of bail pending appeal has to be fairly liberal.
Sent from my iPadDear Kirity RoyGet your facts clear. In the present case the ACCUSED person has been already tried and found GUILTY and therefore the person is no more an accused but a CONVICT. Unlike the parameters to be considered while granting bail to an accused person/s parameters to grant bail to a convicted person are differentOn Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Kirity Roy <kirityroy@gmail.com> wrote:Yes, I do agree with the understanding of Mr. Shanti Bhushan.Accused person in a criminal trial should not be treated as guilty. It is the duty of prosecution (State) to prove him / her guilty before the court.Are we going to establish "presumption of guilt" in he tune of police / state ?? Are we going deny "Right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty" ??At the same time I must support strongly the main message of Mr. N S Venkataraman of Nandini Voice.--On 21 October 2014 21:52, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:I do not see any objection to the grant of bail pending appeal provided it is conditional on the appeal being quickly heard and decided.
Sent from my iPad
Kirity Roy
Secretary
Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha
(MASUM)
&
National Convenor (PACTI)
Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity
40A, Barabagan Lane (4th Floor)
Balaji Place
Shibtala
Srirampur
Hooghly
PIN- 712203
Tele-Fax - +91-33-26220843
Phone- +91-33-26220844 / 0845
e. mail : kirityroy@gmail.com
Web: www.masum.org.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.inPost: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.