If all the supreme court judgements starts incorporating in the act within a year. Then automatically the number of pending cases will come down.
Like in the Income tax act every year few judgements are being incorporated via Finance Act.
Yes few judgements may vary with the act maker view, then while incorporating those judgements some ammendment to it may be done. And for making it possible, it just requires a positive attitude and nothing else.
Like in the case where a PIL was heard after 16 yrs. And without making any decision judge said that in the said act various judgements have been given before and dismissed it. But whether the case which came to the judge was heard before in any other case was either not known to the complainant or judge.
For coming to a conclusion why such a situation occur we only need to know that all such previous judgements are mixed with other judgements. The act is only an act and not the act with announced judgements. Today to fight a case on that act we are in searching for not only a lawyer but also an expert who has not only self incorporated all such judgement but also memorise it with the relevant cases.
Such situation is not only weakening our moral in respect of Indian act but also making it time and money consuming process.
Ankit Khetan
India
On Sunday, 20 October 2013 11:42 PM, "santmathur@gmail.com" <santmathur@gmail.com> wrote:
Pl on your own figure out from the NET through search engines the current discourse on legal fraternity's roles and responsibilities and sucess or otherwise of the Regulatory mechanism. A well structured dicument could then be circulated on the forum to help improve it through "crowd sourcing" techniques. If possible a global perspective could also be presented. SPM
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
-----Original Message-----
From: "National Consultants" <insclaim@sify.com>
Sender: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:04:58
To: 'Pankaj Rai'<raipankaj@yahoo.com>; <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Reply-To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Cc: <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] OVERSTRESSED LITIGANT COLLAPSES IN THE BOMBAY HIGH
COURT.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
-----Original Message-----
From: "National Consultants" <insclaim@sify.com>
Sender: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:04:58
To: 'Pankaj Rai'<raipankaj@yahoo.com>; <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Reply-To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Cc: <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] OVERSTRESSED LITIGANT COLLAPSES IN THE BOMBAY HIGH
COURT.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.