independence of judiciary means they could give dictatorial orders ignoring the law/statutory regulations. knowing fully that there is nothing beyond them. in cases against the govt. some give orders on the basis of sole advise given in chambers by the SG/ASG without allowing petitioner to argue and then get appointed to panels before actual date of retirement. enjoy the fruits of misuse of power till age 70 atleast. example - J bhandari and ex J mukundakam sharma did that and got that. rgds. beniwal
From: Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2013 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] Supreme Court Collegium
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
From: Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2013 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] Supreme Court Collegium
21/2/13
dear Sir,
Responding late. System of colleguim was evovled by the supreme court and there are not agreeing to any change which the Govt. has tried under the guise of much needed judicial reforms. So the status quo continues and now it appears that there is a tacit understanding between the executive branch and judiciary that the Govt. will not interfere in judicial processes and the judiciary will not interefere in policy matters.
Regarding employment of judges after retirement, the Govt. has been using is as an inducement. The appointment of ex-CJI Balkrishnan, CJI (ex) Verma and J. Katju need to be looked at from that angle.
J. Katju has become controversial after making politicial statements against Arun Jetley,leader of oppositon inRS>. Even during his tenure he was not in favour of PILs as these amounted to oversteping into executive(read Govt.) functions .
So we come back to the same basic questions of making reforms in judiciary to eliminate corruption-whethre in appointment or its functioning or re-employment after retirement.
Gaur
From: gen_harwant@hotmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:27:05 +0000
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] Supreme Court Collegium
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
dear Sir,
Responding late. System of colleguim was evovled by the supreme court and there are not agreeing to any change which the Govt. has tried under the guise of much needed judicial reforms. So the status quo continues and now it appears that there is a tacit understanding between the executive branch and judiciary that the Govt. will not interfere in judicial processes and the judiciary will not interefere in policy matters.
Regarding employment of judges after retirement, the Govt. has been using is as an inducement. The appointment of ex-CJI Balkrishnan, CJI (ex) Verma and J. Katju need to be looked at from that angle.
J. Katju has become controversial after making politicial statements against Arun Jetley,leader of oppositon inRS>. Even during his tenure he was not in favour of PILs as these amounted to oversteping into executive(read Govt.) functions .
So we come back to the same basic questions of making reforms in judiciary to eliminate corruption-whethre in appointment or its functioning or re-employment after retirement.
Gaur
From: gen_harwant@hotmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:27:05 +0000
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] Supreme Court Collegium
Dear All, independent judiciary is a myth. As long as there is re-employment for the judges, complete independence cannot come about. HS
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:50:43 +0530
From: dcverma06@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Supreme Court Collegium
Dear All,
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:50:43 +0530
From: dcverma06@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Supreme Court Collegium
Dear All,
I agree with Sri Raizada.In absence of Collegium entrance for politicians would be wide open.It is well known that even active politicians were given chance.Once a
committed Judiciary was a call.All aspects need to be considered before criticizing
a system.
D.C.Verma
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Munish Raizada <pedia333@gmail.com> wrote:
Shri Vaghela ji:The issue does not seem to be that simple. To maintain the independence of the judiciary, the Supreme Court Collegium evolved. If you let politicians get into this, it is easy to understand that the rot will also seep into the judiciary (even though, there is corruption in judiciary as such even now).
Munish K Raizada, MD, FAAPNeonatologist
Chicago, USA
Phone: 1- 217 720 9331 (from India, dial: 001-217-720-9331)
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Babubhai Vaghela <vaghelabd@yahoo.com> wrote:Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"Dear All, Supreme Court Collegium, to me, is worst than Khap Panchayat
that atleast work openly unlike Collegium working secretly. It is
hightime that the Collegium is declared Arbitrary, Undemocratic,
Illegal and Unconstitutional Body - A Dark Blot on Democracy.
Regards,.
--
(Babubhai Vaghela)
C 202, Shrinandnagar V, Makarba Road Vejalpur, Ahmedabad - 380051
M - 94276 08632
http://twitter.com/BabubhaiVaghela
About me at - http://bit.ly/9xsHFj
http://www.youtube.com/user/vaghelabd
(Administrator - Google Group - Right to Information Act 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Right-to-Information-Act-2005/about?hl=en
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.