Re: [IAC++] Identity of Mr. Ash

Dear Major Ravi

Instead of talking vaguely can we talk scientifically/intellectually.

Can you name me the specific MEASURABLE anti-corruption achievements
which Arvind can take absolute and exclusive credit for.

But before that

Can you tell me for how many years Arvind's wife was posted in Delhi/NCR ?

Can you tell me if it is true that she was leaking information to
Arvind which he used to get benefits from various persons under
investigation

Can you tell me why/how Arvind's wife managed to stay posted in Delhi
while "honest / upright officers" like Dr. Ashok Khemka etc get
routinely shunted around like shuttlecocks.

Is it also not true that Anil Ambani sponsored PCRF awards ?

Why don't you tell us who the real sponsor of AAP is, and why all the
targets of AAP/Arvind are only chosen to suit the business interests
of this person/parivaar ?

PS: Incidentally, Ms Shailaja Chandra was ex-Chief Secretary of
GoNCTD, and the information she used to award to genuine RTI
appellants was 10 times what say frauds like Shailesh Gandhi used to
award.

Sarbajit

On 12/1/12, Ravindran Major <majorravi@gmail.com> wrote:
> I totally disagree with Sarbjit Roy and his claim to IAC tag. As mentioned
> earlier IAC became a household name only through association with Team
> Anna. Sarabjit we know as the moderator of Humjanenge e-group.
>
> Next coming to Arvind's 'wild' allegations and his failure to get info
> sought and Sarabjit getting all the info sought itself does give clear
> indication of who does what and how.
>
> Even in this forum we can see how foul mouthed Sarabjit is and he is
> casting aspersions on Arvind for making allegations against a clerk of the
> IAS cadre. These clerks are supposed to be the backbone of the govt
> administration and we know how rotten it is. Even the failure of the RTI
> Act is a success in the way it has exposed the perfidy of these scamsters.
> I dare say that the best of the members of the IAS cadre are third rate
> clerks and the rest traitors!
>
> I had met Aravind for the 1st time in 2007 when NAPM organised a Jan Sansad
> at Jantar Mantar. The worst I could say of him was that he was a serious
> person always. Of course he has his own ideas and the courage of conviction
> to try and put them to test. His PCRF and RTI Awards are examples.
> Personally I was totally against his introducing an award for the best
> information commission but he thought it was necessary to recognise
> whatever good was being done by any information commissioner and he had to
> give that up after 2 years. But you can't blame him for that. It would
> certainly have been some learning experience for him. That's about all.
>
> Anyhow, to cut a long story short, Aravind is head over shoulders compared
> to most of us in this group. If each one us could do even 10 percent of
> what Arvind had been able to do then there could still be reason for hope.
>
> regards n bw
>
> ravi