I am very confused
1) You filed a REQUEST (??) to the "Chief Information" (??)
2) The Information you sought concerns rejection of your
"complaint" (for perjury) to the First Class Magistrate. So why should
CIC have it ???
3) What "Competent Authority" do you refer to ?
4) Why should CIC take a decision on your complaint to a Magistrate ?
Sarbajit
On Dec 4, 7:45 pm, "M.K. Gupta" <mkgupta...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> I
> submitted an RTIapplication to the Central Information Commission for
> giving information on the status of my request sent to the Chief Information
> and (ii) if my request has been rejected, to provide the file notings arriving
> at that decision.
>
> In
> reply to the above, I received a reply from Shri Dhirendra Kumar, CPIO stating
> (i) your request has been filed and (ii) the nothing relating to the rejection
> of your complaint to the First Class Magistrate for the perjury is not
> available in our record.
>
> I am curious
> to know whether any request should be filed without any making noting and taking
> informed decision to file the same silently. The statement that "the notings relating to the rejection to your
> complaint to the first class Magistrate for the perjury is not available in our
> record" means no noting or noting may be in the record of some other
> unit/deptt.
>
> Can a
> request or application should be just filed by the subordinate staff without
> taking a decision or written direction by the Competent Authority? Even if the Competent Authority has just
> written "file" on the application, should it not be informed and copy be
> provided to the applicant?
>
> Whether
> something further can be done in the case to know the reason of inaction on my application. In such a case, whether first appeal
> should be filed and if so, what should be the grounds?
>
> I shall be grateful for your
> valuable guidance.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.