Re: [HumJanenge] What is happening to the IC voted as the "best" by this group ?

Dear Guptaji

The URL link I sent you contains all the information you have asked for.

My objection to PCRF's survey was because it was unscientific (unlike the one we conducted). I believe. PROFESSOR M.M. Ansari had also made similar observations about the PCRF survey. I cannot comment on his views on our poll (where he fared the worst).

The poll I am referring to where MLS got the most votes was conducted 2 years ago and you would have definitely got an intimation to vote on the same at [RTI_India] yahoogroups.

We cannot conduct a similar poll on HJ as Googlegroups has no such facility (unlike Yahoogroups which does)

Sarbajit

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:45 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

Can Sarbajit ji u inform how many votes were polled and the votes each IC got?

I remember last time when many members, probabily you also, opposed such an exercise taken by PCRF of Shri Arvind Kejriwal.

In the poll, it would have been better if the opinions of the members of Hum Janenge groups should have been taken.

U R stating that I also had full voting rights but when I am not aware of such an exercise, how can I cast my vote.

Have u put some email on the Hum Janenge about the opinion poll? If so, please inform the date of that mail.

Only who are at the bottom of popularity need such certification from the RTI's activists. 

I demand fresh poll with more voters. 

---

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, 25 November 2011 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] What is happening to the IC voted as the "best" by this group ?

Dear Guptaji

The group which publicly voted on this question (and in which you also had full voting rights) is [RTI_INDIA] . Please see this thread

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rti_india/message/4781

I opine if a similar poll is conducted today that CIC(SM) would have improved his "score" significantly and IC(AD)'s would have gone down even further.

Sarbajit

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:42 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

Shri MLS and best IC! Why r u joking?  Which group has conferred this award and before conferring the award, whether it has taken the opinion of the members of that group. 

I can site many erroneous decisions by him against the Delhi Development Authority. It is a separate matter that I have not challenged them the the High Court but this fact does not mean that the appellants are satisfied with his decisions.  In many deserving cases, he had never penalized the CPIO.

In the past, he used to start proceedings by making remark targetting the Appellant whether if wants to eat the mangoes or want to count the seed (Gutali). (Aam khane se matlab hai yaa gutali ginne se). Tell me your grievance and that would be settled implying do not press for the information.

I brought this to the knowledge to the then CCIC, Mr. Wajahat Habibullah by sending a letter/ email and after that this phrase was not repeated before me in the subsequent hearings. 

Respondent to my complaint to the CCIC, MLS refused to hear one of my appeal against DDA and recommended for its transfer to CCIC which was later on heard by some other Shri Shailesh Gandhi, IC. In fact, I was happy on this decision of Shri MLS.  However, I cound not attend the hearing in that case as have not received the notice of hearing due to change of my address.