The group which publicly voted on this question (and in which you also had full voting rights) is [RTI_INDIA] . Please see this thread
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rti_india/message/4781
I opine if a similar poll is conducted today that CIC(SM) would have improved his "score" significantly and IC(AD)'s would have gone down even further.
Sarbajit
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:42 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
Shri MLS and best IC! Why r u joking? Which group has conferred this award and before conferring the award, whether it has taken the opinion of the members of that group.I can site many erroneous decisions by him against the Delhi Development Authority. It is a separate matter that I have not challenged them the the High Court but this fact does not mean that the appellants are satisfied with his decisions. In many deserving cases, he had never penalized the CPIO.
In the past, he used to start proceedings by making remark targetting the Appellant whether if wants to eat the mangoes or want to count the seed (Gutali). (Aam khane se matlab hai yaa gutali ginne se). Tell me your grievance and that would be settled implying do not press for the information.I brought this to the knowledge to the then CCIC, Mr. Wajahat Habibullah by sending a letter/ email and after that this phrase was not repeated before me in the subsequent hearings.
Respondent to my complaint to the CCIC, MLS refused to hear one of my appeal against DDA and recommended for its transfer to CCIC which was later on heard by some other Shri Shailesh Gandhi, IC. In fact, I was happy on this decision of Shri MLS. However, I cound not attend the hearing in that case as have not received the notice of hearing due to change of my address.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.