Both of them are registered on this group and apparently read the
emails here with great delight
Sarbajit
On Jun 3, 8:58 am, "M.K. Gupta" <mkgupta...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Have to sent the copy of this mail to Mr. Shekhar Singh and Aruna Roy for a rejoinder? Dear Sarab.
>
> --- On Fri, 3/6/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge]Very Imp RTI Judgement
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Date: Friday, 3 June, 2011, 6:36 AM
>
> Sir
>
> 1) Kindly trim your emails (ie. remove preceding emails) as a courtesy to fellow members.
>
> 2) Kindly post UNIQUE content to this list (and avoid cross posting) as a courtesy to fellow members.
>
> 3) Kindly read the so-called "RTI judgment" and analyse (if you can) why the "judgment" is legally untenable. I mention in passing that Mr Gandhi was the convenor of an anti-national foreign financed network started by Ms.Aruna Roy, Mr Shekhar Singh etc who are out to destroy the RTI Act which people like myself fought so hard to get for the people of India.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:15 AM, mukund parikh <mk...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
> Dear Fellow citizen,
> I attach herewith a copy of the judgment of Shri Shailesh Gandhi which is stayed by Delhi HC. In view of this intervene in Writ Petition for quashing the stay order is to be made. First & foremost, my sincere appreciation to Shri Shailesh Gandhi who has passed this exceptional order (like many of his other) with regard to SC Rules vis-à-vis RTI Act. This order is well reasoned and needs to be held in public interest and your efforts for its affirmation shall be exemplary service to civil society and survival of RTI Act. There are several instances for refusal of information by Bombay HC also on similar ground as specified in the judgment of Shri Shailesh Gandhi. It is nothing but to make RTI Act defunct at almost all levels. Please explore all possibilities how best you can help to this cause and oblige.
> Mukund Parikh / Mumbai
> mk...@yahoo.co.in/09967830099begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 09967830099 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.