Re: [HumJanenge] Fw: file rti applications to know it returns of our netas

Gupta sir i need your contact number please

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:02 IST RAKESH GUPTA wrote:

>dear sirs,
>detail pleading in the court case is avaiable at
>https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B2kSPe2kap7aYzVjNjVmYTAtYzk2MS00NDhhLTlmMTktNmU5MzMyYzk1NTUz&hl=en
><https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B2kSPe2kap7aYzVjNjVmYTAtYzk2MS00NDhhLTlmMTktNmU5MzMyYzk1NTUz&hl=en>These
>connected persons are only delaying the disclosure.
>5 parties had not filed rejoinder till date , although they had received the
>rejoinder 7 months earlier.
>period given for filing is two weeks.
>
>with regards
>rakesh gupta
>
>
>On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1) The case no is WP(C)206/2010 "Escorts Ltd versus Rakesh Kr Gupta"
>>
>> 2) As a Constitutional expert what are your comments on the order of CIC
>> delivered by Shaliesh Gandhi ?.
>>
>> 3) Is it open to a single information commissioner to completely ignore
>> "umpteen" decisions of his brother Commissioners especialy of those of a
>> "full bench" of 5 Commssioners which included the Chief Information
>> Commissioner ?
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Sant Mathur <santmathur@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is the HC stay permanent or proceedings have to begun on the CIC
>>> judgement?
>>> Sarcastic comments are made by SC also on HC judges and their
>>> judgements,as also on GOI and its officials.
>>> The underlying philosophy of balancing the case beween"privacy needs" on
>>> one side and " larger public interest needs" on the other is the one to be
>>> seen in judicial pronouncement.
>>> What all wrong can go(and in fact as per any research has gone} in
>>> disclosure of IT Return info vis-a-vis what and how public good could
>>> happen?
>>> Complex issues require intelligent decision making system,often not
>>> possible w/o recourse to base material and it could as well be some
>>> meaningful and reliable research study. How are judges so brilliant,say more
>>> than all of us very well informed people, to adjudicate on
>>> unprecedented issues wihout being armed with exceptional knowledge? They
>>> certainly aren't in modern complex world.They POSITIVELY need help of expert
>>> knowledge which is often based on relevant research studies.
>>> Having handled umpteen cases in HC/SC,including review petitions(often
>>> successfully) and being sufficiently well conversant with philosophy of LAW
>>> as also scheme of CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION I could say that a casual
>>> comment by any HC judge/Bench is devoid of any meaning.
>>> Its the final decision on the complex issue with all aspects considered
>>> judiciously that we could form opinion on the matter of access to IT return
>>> of politicos 9specially those who have contested elections and are going to
>>> do so.
>>> Informed decision making for exercising the fundamental right of franchise
>>> might include the knowledge of the low down on assets/liabilities and modes
>>> of incomeand taxes paid .Those wanting to come to public life have to be
>>> much more transparent vis-a-vis the rest. Lives of people going to occupy
>>> public offices in USA are dissected fully and only on stringent scrutiny
>>> does one come to get appointed to high public offices.No scope for
>>> committing error at the initial stage itself.
>>> Its all debatable and its preferable to eschew elaborate disussion on the
>>> subject at this stage.
>>> Better if HC gives its verdict in CIC's stayed judgement.
>>> spm
>>>
>>>
>>