I, ADVOCATE SUDHA GANDHI OF MUMBAI AND AS SOCIAL WORKER AM VERY MUCH
INTERESTED IN FARMING/AGRICULTURAL MATTERS AND I LIKE TO HELP AND
GUIDE FARMERS COMMUNITY OF THIS COUNTRY AND I AM READY TO PARTICIPATE
IN ALL ACTIVITIES PERTAINING TO AND RELATED TO FARMERS' GRIEVANCES AND
THEIR ALL SHORT OF PROBLEMS AND I LIKE TO MOVE AMONG THEM AND TO SIT
WITH THEM AND TO HEAR AND THEN TO GIVE LEGAL ADVICE AND TO APPEAR ON
BEHALF OF THEM IN ANY COURT AND BEFORE GRAM PANCHAYAT AND JILLA
PARISHAD AUTHORITY TO PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS AS WELL AS TO REPRESENT ON
BEHALF OF FARMERS BEFORE GOVERNMENT TO PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS. AND TO DO
MANY MORE SUCH ACTIVITIES TO SAVE AND PROTECT LIFE OF FARMERS OF OUR
COUNTRY.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear members
>
> Seeing as how several members are interested in farming / agricultural
> matters and have first-hand expertise on the subject, IAC may consider
> participation in any Parliamentary sub/committee public consultation
> process on Land Acquisition Amendment Bill, if it happens.
>
> Interested members may email me off-list indicating their interest,
> including appearing before the sub/Committee at New Delhi if so
> required on behalf of IAC.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Thursday, May 14, 2015
[IAC#RG] Improper actions of AAP Govt.in Delhi
Dear IAC subscribers
I am pleased to inform IAC community that after the continual evasions
of AAP's Delhi Govt. Secretariat, including Chief Secretary, the
office of Hon'ble L-G of Delhi has taken cognisance of our complaints
that "WiFi in Delhi" scheme is being carried in a non-transparent,
corrupt and fraudulent matter by a so-called Delhi Dialogue Commission
and with manipulation of transfers of certain officers.
IAC is well cognisant that the term "Delhi Dialogue" was coined and
used during the IAC andolan of 2011-2012, and indisputably precedes
the 2010 phase of IAC andolan,since from at least January 21-22 2009
!!!. As such the term "Delhi Dialogue" is an IPR asset of IAC flowing
from the original Brahmic legacy of Sarojini Naidu,a member of HRA.
We would have had no objection if this term/mark was used strictly for
non-political purposes by anybody in the public interest. However, the
AAP has proceeded/attempted to convert this widely known public mark
into its personal property, strangely to be co-terminus with its
Government, through a dubious GoNCTD notification issued, in name of
the Hon'ble L-G, by an officer who properly should have been sitting
in the UT of Andaman and Nicobar.
It is strange that this so-called AAP "Commission" is not constituted
by any act of legislature to make it a body corporate. Neither is it a
Commission of Inquiry.
Accordingly, IAC has reason to think that the term "commission" as
used by GoNCTD is actually a code word to indicate to vested interests
where to negotiate the bribes to be paid through this irregular body
which is presided over by Shri Arvind Kejriwal.
Accordingly also, in the public interest, IAC had taken formal steps
to register / secure its own interest in the name "Delhi Dialogue
Commission", and as today IAC stands duly registered / licenced with
the Central Government to use the mark "Delhi Dialogue Commission",
and we shall actually be doing so very shortly, and also conveying our
strong protests and objections to the Govt of Delhi asking them to
cease and desist from using our licenced mark, especially for misuse
and annexation of lands and the associated rights in Delhi at the cost
of the poor or deprived peoples like farmers and slum dwellers .
Accordingly also, as an urgent interim measure, the IAC hereby
constitutes a working "Delhi Dialogue Commission" as below with
immediate effect from our list members.
1) Chairperson : Er Sarbajit Roy ;
2) Vice-Chairman : Shri Veeresh Malik ;
3) Member : Ms. Gita Dewan Verma ; Expert planner and author "Slumming India"
4) Member : Mr. Ram Kumar Atri ; Land rights expert
All positions are honorary and unpaid. No.TA/DA etc. shall be allowed.
Further information shall ensue from this IAC Commission in due
course, including addition / co-opting of members / experts / RWA etc.
to ensure widest possible participation of people of Delhi, especially
slum dwellers, farmers and workers, in having honest and transparent
structured dialogues with the Government of Delhi for their problems /
grievances.
Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption, jan andolan
I am pleased to inform IAC community that after the continual evasions
of AAP's Delhi Govt. Secretariat, including Chief Secretary, the
office of Hon'ble L-G of Delhi has taken cognisance of our complaints
that "WiFi in Delhi" scheme is being carried in a non-transparent,
corrupt and fraudulent matter by a so-called Delhi Dialogue Commission
and with manipulation of transfers of certain officers.
IAC is well cognisant that the term "Delhi Dialogue" was coined and
used during the IAC andolan of 2011-2012, and indisputably precedes
the 2010 phase of IAC andolan,since from at least January 21-22 2009
!!!. As such the term "Delhi Dialogue" is an IPR asset of IAC flowing
from the original Brahmic legacy of Sarojini Naidu,a member of HRA.
We would have had no objection if this term/mark was used strictly for
non-political purposes by anybody in the public interest. However, the
AAP has proceeded/attempted to convert this widely known public mark
into its personal property, strangely to be co-terminus with its
Government, through a dubious GoNCTD notification issued, in name of
the Hon'ble L-G, by an officer who properly should have been sitting
in the UT of Andaman and Nicobar.
It is strange that this so-called AAP "Commission" is not constituted
by any act of legislature to make it a body corporate. Neither is it a
Commission of Inquiry.
Accordingly, IAC has reason to think that the term "commission" as
used by GoNCTD is actually a code word to indicate to vested interests
where to negotiate the bribes to be paid through this irregular body
which is presided over by Shri Arvind Kejriwal.
Accordingly also, in the public interest, IAC had taken formal steps
to register / secure its own interest in the name "Delhi Dialogue
Commission", and as today IAC stands duly registered / licenced with
the Central Government to use the mark "Delhi Dialogue Commission",
and we shall actually be doing so very shortly, and also conveying our
strong protests and objections to the Govt of Delhi asking them to
cease and desist from using our licenced mark, especially for misuse
and annexation of lands and the associated rights in Delhi at the cost
of the poor or deprived peoples like farmers and slum dwellers .
Accordingly also, as an urgent interim measure, the IAC hereby
constitutes a working "Delhi Dialogue Commission" as below with
immediate effect from our list members.
1) Chairperson : Er Sarbajit Roy ;
2) Vice-Chairman : Shri Veeresh Malik ;
3) Member : Ms. Gita Dewan Verma ; Expert planner and author "Slumming India"
4) Member : Mr. Ram Kumar Atri ; Land rights expert
All positions are honorary and unpaid. No.TA/DA etc. shall be allowed.
Further information shall ensue from this IAC Commission in due
course, including addition / co-opting of members / experts / RWA etc.
to ensure widest possible participation of people of Delhi, especially
slum dwellers, farmers and workers, in having honest and transparent
structured dialogues with the Government of Delhi for their problems /
grievances.
Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption, jan andolan
Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING
the tragedy in the country is if judiciary is criticised the person is held for contempt of court for the judiciary can do no wrong and freeing killers and corrupt people appears to be the justice that is given by them while thousands languish in jail and civil cases go on for not just years but drag for generations. first the excutive, second the legislative and third the judiciary and the fourth estate - the media - all gone haywire where does one turn to get justice.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Raghavan R N <raghavan6@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sir,If some one is Punished by a Court, it does not mean Judiciary is right . There are many cases pending Judgement in a number of Courts in india, the two recently came up for public attention is that of Ms Jayalalitha and Mr Salman KhanEvery one knows that Ms Jayalalitha's case is one related to Politics and it is natural, every one wanted her to be punished[ her opponents]. She has been an actress for a long time and her back ground is too good to be considered that she amassed wealth only by political means. Judgement by a Lower Court need not necessarily decide the final outcome. Law provides more options till Supreme Court. If it is a fit case for fighting, Govt should initiate action to file a suit in Supreme Court. None prevented and no one should close this option. Counting dresses , chappals and other house hold articles for estimating the assets of Ms Jayalalitha looks odd.In the case of Ms Salman Khan, it can be appreciated that this case is not of national importance. Daily such run over cases happen in India and abroad and even yesterday three women were killed under the wheels of a police vehicle. It is an accident can be due to negligence.Here too, the accused has options to appeal in higher court to get justice. Bail was granted as he is an actor and is working in number of FILMS. All get affected. Granting bail , fast or slow cannot be questioned. Definitely, prominent people get things done fast and for others, it takes time. It is Indian culture and way of doing things in India.raghavan rn
From: boompellivenkatrao@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:47:50 -0400
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMINGOne more case of SATYAM Ramblings Raju. The fraud is a open book to every one. He got bail with in a month.B. VENKAT RAO
Sent from my iPhoneJudiciary in India has made a mockery of themselves . They know that there is no one in the governing system who can punish them for all the wrongs.Now with the judgement made in favour of Jayalalitha clearly shows that how our judiciary has been working . The presenting officers and the defence advocates have been playing games with each other .At least punish out off those who have been proved to be wrong .Same thing happened with the case of Salman Khan.On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"ToIndia Against CorruptionWHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING
After several years of trial in a killing case, an actor was held guilty by the court and jail term awarded. But, he got bail in a few hours from another judge. After several years of trial in a corruption case, a Chief Minister was found guilty and awarded jail term and hefty fine. But, after a few months, a higher court judge called her innocent and acquitted everyone involved totally. Now, one wonders which judge is right and which judge is wrong.
While rich politicians and cinema actors seem to have the last laugh, there are thousands of dharidhranarayanas in India who stay in jail for lesser crime for several years without being heard. Are they not as much Indians as the cinema actor driving his car on a pavement dweller and rich politician indulging in corrupt practices ? Are we settling down for this sort of democracy in India ?
An average common man in India, millions of whom do not have any political affiliation have already lost faith in the politicians in power and bureaucracy. He has been thinking that the judiciary is ultimate conscience keeper of the country. But, when judiciary give judgements with so much of contradiction between one judge and the other and providing bail and relief to the convicted actor and politicians with great speed and with many judges in India already having been accused of corrupt practices in the past, people tend to develop doubts about judiciary too.
Now, what can a common man do , if he loses faith in politicians in power, bureaucrats and judges? It is alarming to think about such situation and the possibilities.
N.S.Venkataraman
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING
This is the problem in India.. Every government agency is deteriorated to its worst level. There is no fear of law as Judiciary has become a part of Corruption. You are strong if you have strong political connection and rest of the people are left to debate who is right and who is wrong - just for mental satisfaction and to prove that they have philosophical brain..
I am proud of my country but shameful to so called DESH DROHI who are killing values day by day,,,They are driving this country to undefined terrorism..
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Raghavan R N <raghavan6@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sir,If some one is Punished by a Court, it does not mean Judiciary is right . There are many cases pending Judgement in a number of Courts in india, the two recently came up for public attention is that of Ms Jayalalitha and Mr Salman KhanEvery one knows that Ms Jayalalitha's case is one related to Politics and it is natural, every one wanted her to be punished[ her opponents]. She has been an actress for a long time and her back ground is too good to be considered that she amassed wealth only by political means. Judgement by a Lower Court need not necessarily decide the final outcome. Law provides more options till Supreme Court. If it is a fit case for fighting, Govt should initiate action to file a suit in Supreme Court. None prevented and no one should close this option. Counting dresses , chappals and other house hold articles for estimating the assets of Ms Jayalalitha looks odd.In the case of Ms Salman Khan, it can be appreciated that this case is not of national importance. Daily such run over cases happen in India and abroad and even yesterday three women were killed under the wheels of a police vehicle. It is an accident can be due to negligence.Here too, the accused has options to appeal in higher court to get justice. Bail was granted as he is an actor and is working in number of FILMS. All get affected. Granting bail , fast or slow cannot be questioned. Definitely, prominent people get things done fast and for others, it takes time. It is Indian culture and way of doing things in India.raghavan rn
From: boompellivenkatrao@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:47:50 -0400
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMINGOne more case of SATYAM Ramblings Raju. The fraud is a open book to every one. He got bail with in a month.B. VENKAT RAO
Sent from my iPhoneJudiciary in India has made a mockery of themselves . They know that there is no one in the governing system who can punish them for all the wrongs.Now with the judgement made in favour of Jayalalitha clearly shows that how our judiciary has been working . The presenting officers and the defence advocates have been playing games with each other .At least punish out off those who have been proved to be wrong .Same thing happened with the case of Salman Khan.On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:ToIndia Against CorruptionWHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING
After several years of trial in a killing case, an actor was held guilty by the court and jail term awarded. But, he got bail in a few hours from another judge. After several years of trial in a corruption case, a Chief Minister was found guilty and awarded jail term and hefty fine. But, after a few months, a higher court judge called her innocent and acquitted everyone involved totally. Now, one wonders which judge is right and which judge is wrong.
While rich politicians and cinema actors seem to have the last laugh, there are thousands of dharidhranarayanas in India who stay in jail for lesser crime for several years without being heard. Are they not as much Indians as the cinema actor driving his car on a pavement dweller and rich politician indulging in corrupt practices ? Are we settling down for this sort of democracy in India ?
An average common man in India, millions of whom do not have any political affiliation have already lost faith in the politicians in power and bureaucracy. He has been thinking that the judiciary is ultimate conscience keeper of the country. But, when judiciary give judgements with so much of contradiction between one judge and the other and providing bail and relief to the convicted actor and politicians with great speed and with many judges in India already having been accused of corrupt practices in the past, people tend to develop doubts about judiciary too.
Now, what can a common man do , if he loses faith in politicians in power, bureaucrats and judges? It is alarming to think about such situation and the possibilities.
N.S.Venkataraman
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] IAC position on Land Acquisition Amendment Bill
Dear sir
I am interested to know the details and then give my views at delhi.
Dr N C Jain
On Thursday, May 14, 2015 11:11 AM, Girinder Singh <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:
A welcome step sir, in my view you may be the best judge to decide over each & every concerning matter of mass interests of people & country, IAC is only a hope in my view! Thanks to you and all!
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13-May-2015, at 10:01 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear members
>
> Seeing as how several members are interested in farming / agricultural
> matters and have first-hand expertise on the subject, IAC may consider
> participation in any Parliamentary sub/committee public consultation
> process on Land Acquisition Amendment Bill, if it happens.
>
> Interested members may email me off-list indicating their interest,
> including appearing before the sub/Committee at New Delhi if so
> required on behalf of IAC.
>
> Sarbajit
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13-May-2015, at 10:01 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear members
>
> Seeing as how several members are interested in farming / agricultural
> matters and have first-hand expertise on the subject, IAC may consider
> participation in any Parliamentary sub/committee public consultation
> process on Land Acquisition Amendment Bill, if it happens.
>
> Interested members may email me off-list indicating their interest,
> including appearing before the sub/Committee at New Delhi if so
> required on behalf of IAC.
>
> Sarbajit
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] IAC position on Land Acquisition Amendment Bill
Dear Sarabjit.
Based on my humble rural background and my two year research on rural poverty, I will be happy to participate in any discussion or presentation on the issue. I am of the firm view that agriculture and animal related activity is insufficient to support the rural population of India and in order to stop migration of rural poor to urban slums jobs have to be created in what is presently rural area through industrialization and infrastructure development in rural and rurban areas. For this to happen planned industrial and population centres need to be created and land needs to be made available for this purpose at suitable locations. Land owners agreement to the extent of 80% is neither practicable nor efficient.
Having said that , it is essential that land acquired by governments must not be doled out to industry or colonizers in an unfair and arbitrary manner .
Regards
Brig R S Chhikara
91- 9899995152
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2015 10:01 AM
Subject: [IAC#RG] IAC position on Land Acquisition Amendment Bill
Dear members
Seeing as how several members are interested in farming / agricultural
matters and have first-hand expertise on the subject, IAC may consider
participation in any Parliamentary sub/committee public consultation
process on Land Acquisition Amendment Bill, if it happens.
Interested members may email me off-list indicating their interest,
including appearing before the sub/Committee at New Delhi if so
required on behalf of IAC.
Sarbajit
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] IAC position on Land Acquisition Amendment Bill
A welcome step sir, in my view you may be the best judge to decide over each & every concerning matter of mass interests of people & country, IAC is only a hope in my view! Thanks to you and all!
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13-May-2015, at 10:01 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear members
>
> Seeing as how several members are interested in farming / agricultural
> matters and have first-hand expertise on the subject, IAC may consider
> participation in any Parliamentary sub/committee public consultation
> process on Land Acquisition Amendment Bill, if it happens.
>
> Interested members may email me off-list indicating their interest,
> including appearing before the sub/Committee at New Delhi if so
> required on behalf of IAC.
>
> Sarbajit
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13-May-2015, at 10:01 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear members
>
> Seeing as how several members are interested in farming / agricultural
> matters and have first-hand expertise on the subject, IAC may consider
> participation in any Parliamentary sub/committee public consultation
> process on Land Acquisition Amendment Bill, if it happens.
>
> Interested members may email me off-list indicating their interest,
> including appearing before the sub/Committee at New Delhi if so
> required on behalf of IAC.
>
> Sarbajit
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)