--Seema Mustafa
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Tuesday, February 2, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] should be of interest
Re: [IAC#RG] GoI's 'Safar' data exposes AAP's #ODD-EVEN flop show
Kejriwal's ill advised move for industrial park in Delhi
Delhi is now considered to be one of the most polluted cities in the world. Obviously, what is needed to reduce the pollution load in the city is to decongest the population to the extent possible, by launching imaginative schemes to make it attractive and possible for people to move out of Delhi.
Instead of thinking and acting on such pragmatic strategies, Kejriwal appears to be keen to promote industrial park in Rani Khera area In West Delhi, by occupying 147 acres of land to construct a huge building complex that would cost around Rs.3098 cr. for housing many offices and other commercial activities.
When concerned people met him carrying with them the signatures of 5000 citizens of Delhi opposing his move to construct industrial park and asking for construction of an eco friendly bio diversity park, Kejriwal appears to have rejected the suggestions outright and with amazing short sighteness ,he was reported to have said that he would take ultimate decision after consulting with 'Mohulla sabha'.
Certainly, it is clear now that Kejriwal is running out of ideas. His recent move for odd-even vehicle movement in Delhi is a careless step, that has yielded no results, as expected. What is required is to de congest the vehicle population in Delhi by totally denying registrations for new cars and two wheelers for another 3 years until the pollution load would diminish to acceptable level and imposing ban on old vehicles that do not have the required eco standards..
Kejriwal has targeted the cars, while the number one pollutant in Delhi is dust, number 2 bei ng trucks and number 3 being the two wheelers. He has not found any tangible solution with his odd even s cheme.
While this is so, he wants to go ahead with his industrial park plan arguing that it would promote employment and bring revenue to the state. It is surprising that Kejriwal has not understood that with employment generation that would attract more people from outside Delhi, pollution load will also further increase ,that Delhi cannot afford. Instead of trying to find solution for pollution problem, he is adding to it by launching an industrial park.
Certainly, there is strong case for the concerned citizens in Delhi who understand the grave nature of the ecological issues, to organise themselves and launch a strong campaign to ensure that Kejriwal would give up this ill advised industrial park proposal. The campaign should demand that the 147 acre of land should be converted to a bio diversity park, which can be a healthy ecological hub for Delhi city, that Delhi needs desperately.
The consequence of constructing a massive industrial park in Delhi is too serious from the ecological point of view, to be ignored. There is urgent need for vigorous public protest to save Delhi from one more step towards ecological disaster.N.S.VenkataramanNandini Voice for the DeprivedOn Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:55 PM, truevalue_pandian <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"Legal wrangles, as we all know, can never SOLVE a problem. It can only postpone a decision, sometimes indefinitely. The solution lies in everyone tuning their engines consenciously, CNG buses and LPG autos. Educate your Sardarji mechanics on environment and vehicle exhaust pollution. They will understand better, faster than us.
Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>Sir
>
>To better assist you, I reproduce the section (115 MVA)
>
>"115. Power to restrict the use of vehicles.—The State Government or
>any authority authorised in this behalf by the State Government, if
>satisfied that it is necessary in the interest of public safety or
>convenience, or because of the nature of any road or bridge, may by
>notification in the Official Gazette, prohibit or restrict, subject to
>such exceptions and conditions as may be specified in the
>notification, the driving of motor vehicles or of any specified class
>or description of motor vehicles or the use of trailers either
>generally in a specified area or on a specified road and when any such
>prohibition or restriction is imposed, shall cause appropriate traffic
>signs to be placed or erected under section 116 at suitable places:
>Provided that where any prohibition or restriction under this section
>is to remain in force for not more than one month, notification
>thereof in the Official Gazette shall not be necessary, but such local
>publicity as the circumstances may permit, shall be given of such
>prohibition or restriction."
>
>The ODD-EVEN notification restricts/prohibits "plying"of vehicles
>based on their last digit
>
>The dictionary definitions of "plying" in context of vehicles is
>
>Oxford
>http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/learner/ply
>"(literary or Indian English) (of ships, buses, etc.) to travel
>regularly along a particular route or between two particular places +
>adv./prep. Ferries ply across a narrow strait to the island. The train
>plies twice a day between Paris and Madrid. Buses ply regularly to and
>from these places."
>
>Cambridge
>http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ply
>"ply verb (TRAVEL)
>› [I + adv/prep, T] old-fashioned When a boat, train, bus, etc.
>plies a particular route, it makes that journey regularly:
>High-speed trains regularly ply between Paris and Lyons. This
>airline has been plying the transatlantic route for many years."
>
>Miram Webster
>"to go or travel regularly,
>a : to make a practice of rowing or sailing over or on <the boat
>plies the river>
>b : to go or travel regularly over, on, or through <jets plying the skies>"
>
>This notification, does not, to my own mind, restrict occasional
>driving of private personal vehicles.
>
>This notification was MALAFIDELY issued at last moment (28th evening)
>so that this aspect was not clarified.
>
>The views of all our list advocates is solicited to clarify this point
>and provide the law citations
>
>Sarbajit
>
>
>On 1/10/16, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In the context plying clearly would mean driving whether by the owner
>> himself or by an engaged driver.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On 10-Jan-2016, at 11:07 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Sureshan
>>>
>>> As a SC advocate, could you clarify my tiny legal doubt on ODD-EVEN
>>> scheme.
>>>
>>> The ODD-EVEN notification only prohibits/restricts the "plying" of
>>> vehicles,whereas the concerned section 115 of .Motor Vehicle Act
>>> empowers prohibition of "driving" of vehicles.
>>>
>>> Surely the lawyers like you are not restricted by this notification
>>> from "driving" your vehicles on all days to attend court.
>>>
>>> Perhaps some seniors like Shanti Bhushanji can examine it since the
>>> dictionary definition of "plying" means to do so "regularly ...
>>> usually for commercial purposes".
>>>
>>> It seems to me that Kejriwal has played yet another FRAUD on people of
>>> Delhi
>>>
>>> Sarbajit
>>>
>>>> On 1/9/16, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear All ,
>>>> If any body has tried to board Metro train during peak hours then they
>>>> will
>>>> realize the exact problem. Delhi public are suffering and cursing
>>>> Kejriwal
>>>> and his company. Public will not violate rule as they don't want to pay
>>>> hefty fine. This is nothing new in Delhi as general Public avoid
>>>> spiting
>>>> in Metro stations on account of strict monitoring. People is not going
>>>> to
>>>> violate any law if strict punishment is provided. If Kejriwal Ban all
>>>> male
>>>> from getting out of their home by insisting hefty fine against
>>>> violations
>>>> with strict monitoring none will come out.If medias and court has shown
>>>> blind eye on such bans whole world will think that every thing is fine.
>>>>
>>>> In fact an undeclared emergency is going on in Delhi by curtailing the
>>>> fundamental rights of large number of citizens. Kejriwal is a New Born
>>>> Hitler ( don't be surprised He will become a Hitler and rule this
>>>> country
>>>> in future, any doubt then refer life history of Hitler ) see How
>>>> Kejriwal
>>>> shut the mouth of all institutions by lies and false hood , and how he
>>>> destroyed all individual rights by highlighting common good.
>>>> Suffering individuals in Delhi is outnumbered in this case because
>>>> majority
>>>> of people are already using public conve
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Monday, February 1, 2016
Sunday, January 31, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] GoI's 'Safar' data exposes AAP's #ODD-EVEN flop show
Kejriwal's ill advised move for industrial park in Delhi
Delhi is now considered to be one of the most polluted cities in the world. Obviously, what is needed to reduce the pollution load in the city is to decongest the population to the extent possible, by launching imaginative schemes to make it attractive and possible for people to move out of Delhi.
Instead of thinking and acting on such pragmatic strategies, Kejriwal appears to be keen to promote industrial park in Rani Khera area In West Delhi, by occupying 147 acres of land to construct a huge building complex that would cost around Rs.3098 cr. for housing many offices and other commercial activities.
When concerned people met him carrying with them the signatures of 5000 citizens of Delhi opposing his move to construct industrial park and asking for construction of an eco friendly bio diversity park, Kejriwal appears to have rejected the suggestions outright and with amazing short sighteness ,he was reported to have said that he would take ultimate decision after consulting with 'Mohulla sabha'.
Certainly, it is clear now that Kejriwal is running out of ideas. His recent move for odd-even vehicle movement in Delhi is a careless step, that has yielded no results, as expected. What is required is to de congest the vehicle population in Delhi by totally denying registrations for new cars and two wheelers for another 3 years until the pollution load would diminish to acceptable level and imposing ban on old vehicles that do not have the required eco standards..
Kejriwal has targeted the cars, while the number one pollutant in Delhi is dust, number 2 bei ng trucks and number 3 being the two wheelers. He has not found any tangible solution with his odd even s cheme.
While this is so, he wants to go ahead with his industrial park plan arguing that it would promote employment and bring revenue to the state. It is surprising that Kejriwal has not understood that with employment generation that would attract more people from outside Delhi, pollution load will also further increase ,that Delhi cannot afford. Instead of trying to find solution for pollution problem, he is adding to it by launching an industrial park.
Certainly, there is strong case for the concerned citizens in Delhi who understand the grave nature of the ecological issues, to organise themselves and launch a strong campaign to ensure that Kejriwal would give up this ill advised industrial park proposal. The campaign should demand that the 147 acre of land should be converted to a bio diversity park, which can be a healthy ecological hub for Delhi city, that Delhi needs desperately.
Legal wrangles, as we all know, can never SOLVE a problem. It can only postpone a decision, sometimes indefinitely. The solution lies in everyone tuning their engines consenciously, CNG buses and LPG autos. Educate your Sardarji mechanics on environment and vehicle exhaust pollution. They will understand better, faster than us.
Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>Sir
>
>To better assist you, I reproduce the section (115 MVA)
>
>"115. Power to restrict the use of vehicles.—The State Government or
>any authority authorised in this behalf by the State Government, if
>satisfied that it is necessary in the interest of public safety or
>convenience, or because of the nature of any road or bridge, may by
>notification in the Official Gazette, prohibit or restrict, subject to
>such exceptions and conditions as may be specified in the
>notification, the driving of motor vehicles or of any specified class
>or description of motor vehicles or the use of trailers either
>generally in a specified area or on a specified road and when any such
>prohibition or restriction is imposed, shall cause appropriate traffic
>signs to be placed or erected under section 116 at suitable places:
>Provided that where any prohibition or restriction under this section
>is to remain in force for not more than one month, notification
>thereof in the Official Gazette shall not be necessary, but such local
>publicity as the circumstances may permit, shall be given of such
>prohibition or restriction."
>
>The ODD-EVEN notification restricts/prohibits "plying"of vehicles
>based on their last digit
>
>The dictionary definitions of "plying" in context of vehicles is
>
>Oxford
>http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/learner/ply
>"(literary or Indian English) (of ships, buses, etc.) to travel
>regularly along a particular route or between two particular places +
>adv./prep. Ferries ply across a narrow strait to the island. The train
>plies twice a day between Paris and Madrid. Buses ply regularly to and
>from these places."
>
>Cambridge
>http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ply
>"ply verb (TRAVEL)
>› [I + adv/prep, T] old-fashioned When a boat, train, bus, etc.
>plies a particular route, it makes that journey regularly:
>High-speed trains regularly ply between Paris and Lyons. This
>airline has been plying the transatlantic route for many years."
>
>Miram Webster
>"to go or travel regularly,
>a : to make a practice of rowing or sailing over or on <the boat
>plies the river>
>b : to go or travel regularly over, on, or through <jets plying the skies>"
>
>This notification, does not, to my own mind, restrict occasional
>driving of private personal vehicles.
>
>This notification was MALAFIDELY issued at last moment (28th evening)
>so that this aspect was not clarified.
>
>The views of all our list advocates is solicited to clarify this point
>and provide the law citations
>
>Sarbajit
>
>
>On 1/10/16, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In the context plying clearly would mean driving whether by the owner
>> himself or by an engaged driver.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On 10-Jan-2016, at 11:07 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Sureshan
>>>
>>> As a SC advocate, could you clarify my tiny legal doubt on ODD-EVEN
>>> scheme.
>>>
>>> The ODD-EVEN notification only prohibits/restricts the "plying" of
>>> vehicles,whereas the concerned section 115 of .Motor Vehicle Act
>>> empowers prohibition of "driving" of vehicles.
>>>
>>> Surely the lawyers like you are not restricted by this notification
>>> from "driving" your vehicles on all days to attend court.
>>>
>>> Perhaps some seniors like Shanti Bhushanji can examine it since the
>>> dictionary definition of "plying" means to do so "regularly ...
>>> usually for commercial purposes".
>>>
>>> It seems to me that Kejriwal has played yet another FRAUD on people of
>>> Delhi
>>>
>>> Sarbajit
>>>
>>>> On 1/9/16, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear All ,
>>>> If any body has tried to board Metro train during peak hours then they
>>>> will
>>>> realize the exact problem. Delhi public are suffering and cursing
>>>> Kejriwal
>>>> and his company. Public will not violate rule as they don't want to pay
>>>> hefty fine. This is nothing new in Delhi as general Public avoid
>>>> spiting
>>>> in Metro stations on account of strict monitoring. People is not going
>>>> to
>>>> violate any law if strict punishment is provided. If Kejriwal Ban all
>>>> male
>>>> from getting out of their home by insisting hefty fine against
>>>> violations
>>>> with strict monitoring none will come out.If medias and court has shown
>>>> blind eye on such bans whole world will think that every thing is fine.
>>>>
>>>> In fact an undeclared emergency is going on in Delhi by curtailing the
>>>> fundamental rights of large number of citizens. Kejriwal is a New Born
>>>> Hitler ( don't be surprised He will become a Hitler and rule this
>>>> country
>>>> in future, any doubt then refer life history of Hitler ) see How
>>>> Kejriwal
>>>> shut the mouth of all institutions by lies and false hood , and how he
>>>> destroyed all individual rights by highlighting common good.
>>>> Suffering individuals in Delhi is outnumbered in this case because
>>>> majority
>>>> of people are already using public conve
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Saturday, January 30, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] LODHA Committee report on cricket
Rina Mukherji <rina.mukherji@gmail.com> wrote:
Very simple - Lodha always toed the government line. This joker presided over the Gen VK Singh case !On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:3) Saying that betting must be legalised is like saying sale of narcotics should also be legalised. Very conveniently Justice (?) Lodha recommends that this legalised betting industry should be regulated by retired High Court judges.[Presumably one mafia will smoothly replace another]2) It seems there is more "fixing" in these kind of retired judges reports than in the BCCI. {Cure being worse than the disease)After reading the Lodha Committee report on Indian cricket my initial comments :-1) How was this person (Justice (retd) RM Lodha)) ever elevated to SC, going on to become CJI ?
https://lodhacommittee.wordpress.com/IAC wonders what is more dangerous for the nation, puffed up retired interfering duffers like Ajit Doval who bungle our security to score brownie points or such retired judges ?Sarbajit
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] GoI's 'Safar' data exposes AAP's #ODD-EVEN flop show
Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>Sir
>
>To better assist you, I reproduce the section (115 MVA)
>
>"115. Power to restrict the use of vehicles.—The State Government or
>any authority authorised in this behalf by the State Government, if
>satisfied that it is necessary in the interest of public safety or
>convenience, or because of the nature of any road or bridge, may by
>notification in the Official Gazette, prohibit or restrict, subject to
>such exceptions and conditions as may be specified in the
>notification, the driving of motor vehicles or of any specified class
>or description of motor vehicles or the use of trailers either
>generally in a specified area or on a specified road and when any such
>prohibition or restriction is imposed, shall cause appropriate traffic
>signs to be placed or erected under section 116 at suitable places:
>Provided that where any prohibition or restriction under this section
>is to remain in force for not more than one month, notification
>thereof in the Official Gazette shall not be necessary, but such local
>publicity as the circumstances may permit, shall be given of such
>prohibition or restriction."
>
>The ODD-EVEN notification restricts/prohibits "plying"of vehicles
>based on their last digit
>
>The dictionary definitions of "plying" in context of vehicles is
>
>Oxford
>http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/learner/ply
>"(literary or Indian English) (of ships, buses, etc.) to travel
>regularly along a particular route or between two particular places +
>adv./prep. Ferries ply across a narrow strait to the island. The train
>plies twice a day between Paris and Madrid. Buses ply regularly to and
>from these places."
>
>Cambridge
>http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ply
>"ply verb (TRAVEL)
>› [I + adv/prep, T] old-fashioned When a boat, train, bus, etc.
>plies a particular route, it makes that journey regularly:
>High-speed trains regularly ply between Paris and Lyons. This
>airline has been plying the transatlantic route for many years."
>
>Miram Webster
>"to go or travel regularly,
>a : to make a practice of rowing or sailing over or on <the boat
>plies the river>
>b : to go or travel regularly over, on, or through <jets plying the skies>"
>
>This notification, does not, to my own mind, restrict occasional
>driving of private personal vehicles.
>
>This notification was MALAFIDELY issued at last moment (28th evening)
>so that this aspect was not clarified.
>
>The views of all our list advocates is solicited to clarify this point
>and provide the law citations
>
>Sarbajit
>
>
>On 1/10/16, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In the context plying clearly would mean driving whether by the owner
>> himself or by an engaged driver.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On 10-Jan-2016, at 11:07 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Sureshan
>>>
>>> As a SC advocate, could you clarify my tiny legal doubt on ODD-EVEN
>>> scheme.
>>>
>>> The ODD-EVEN notification only prohibits/restricts the "plying" of
>>> vehicles,whereas the concerned section 115 of .Motor Vehicle Act
>>> empowers prohibition of "driving" of vehicles.
>>>
>>> Surely the lawyers like you are not restricted by this notification
>>> from "driving" your vehicles on all days to attend court.
>>>
>>> Perhaps some seniors like Shanti Bhushanji can examine it since the
>>> dictionary definition of "plying" means to do so "regularly ...
>>> usually for commercial purposes".
>>>
>>> It seems to me that Kejriwal has played yet another FRAUD on people of
>>> Delhi
>>>
>>> Sarbajit
>>>
>>>> On 1/9/16, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear All ,
>>>> If any body has tried to board Metro train during peak hours then they
>>>> will
>>>> realize the exact problem. Delhi public are suffering and cursing
>>>> Kejriwal
>>>> and his company. Public will not violate rule as they don't want to pay
>>>> hefty fine. This is nothing new in Delhi as general Public avoid
>>>> spiting
>>>> in Metro stations on account of strict monitoring. People is not going
>>>> to
>>>> violate any law if strict punishment is provided. If Kejriwal Ban all
>>>> male
>>>> from getting out of their home by insisting hefty fine against
>>>> violations
>>>> with strict monitoring none will come out.If medias and court has shown
>>>> blind eye on such bans whole world will think that every thing is fine.
>>>>
>>>> In fact an undeclared emergency is going on in Delhi by curtailing the
>>>> fundamental rights of large number of citizens. Kejriwal is a New Born
>>>> Hitler ( don't be surprised He will become a Hitler and rule this
>>>> country
>>>> in future, any doubt then refer life history of Hitler ) see How
>>>> Kejriwal
>>>> shut the mouth of all institutions by lies and false hood , and how he
>>>> destroyed all individual rights by highlighting common good.
>>>> Suffering individuals in Delhi is outnumbered in this case because
>>>> majority
>>>> of people are already using public conve
Thursday, January 21, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] GoI's 'Safar' data exposes AAP's #ODD-EVEN flop show
Diwan Singh ji:I had a look at the video also. Your point of view is well taken. Keep up your fight.We would also like to raise your struggle via NewsGram (www.NewsGram.com). A reporter will reach out to you.Munish K Raizada, MD, FAAPBoard Certified Neonatologist
Chicago, USA
Phone: USA: +1- 217 720 9331 ; India: +91 98737- 03054Skype: munish.raizadaFollow me at:On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Diwan Singh <diwans2007@gmail.com> wrote:I have been associated with Kejriwal for last 16 years since the days of Parivartan. I was its founding member. Though I would appreciate his penchant for fighting administrative, financial corruption, but his knowledge and viewpoint on the corruption that goes with development model is non existent. This is more serious then the administrative corruption. This is a corruption of ideology that directly affect the development of millions in the city.He is fooling people in name of swaraj at the same time.This Odd Even is a drama he is doing, as he refuse to go into basics of pollution problem that lies in the development model.8 lakh people live in a stretch in Mundka Kirari area in West Delhi, with no open space and playgrounds, and consequently, pollution levels crossing 1000 units. To get a gasp of breath, the residents want that the last remaining 147 acres under DSSIDC be left for a biodiversity park and playfields. For last 6 months we raised this campaign, met the minister Satender jain, the local MLAs and got more than 5000 signatures on petition to CM.On 6th January, 2016 I with a delegation met Kejriwal to present this demand. But he was totally against any balanced development. He want industries and create employment, no scope for green space in his model of development. He has only populist agenda up his sleeve. He only sees votes in every task.See our Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/Delhiopenspaces/?ref=hlBelow is the what transpired in the meeting with Kejriwal:"In the morning of 6th Jan, we met the CM at his residence at Civil Lines, Delhi. After long argument, he said, he would look into the matter and discuss with minister Satender Jain. But the reason he was giving to refuse our demands were lopsided and populist. He said we need to look for balanced development and playgrounds, parks can not be created everywhere to meet people' s fancy demands. To this we contended that, exactly so, for the sake of balanced development, we are making our demands; as the area is a concrete jungle with no green space as balance. We requested him to define ' balanced development." We also narrated to him the reaction of his Industry Minister, Mr. Satender Jain. Mr Jain had said that the Government wanted revenue that would be obtained by selling, leasing this land to factories; and can not afford to lose this huge chunk of land to green demands. we submitted 5000 signatures from residents and signatures from two local MLAs. We submitted the pollution readings of the area. And a calculation as per MPD norms, with finding that there is requirement of 867 acres as green open space for the area. But, we have only 20-30 acres in this area. The CM said, we have to create jobs through industrial area. To this, Radha Devi from Prem nagar contended that we can go for job to a farther place, commute another 5 kms, but we can get good air only from our neighborhood. Ashish from Rajdhani Park suggested that the project maybe shifted to 300 acres complex at Kanjhawla. There is enough open space around that location and the desired balance can be achieved there. Gaurav Pandey, the young student from Premnagar was categorical that we can not afford to survive without playgrounds. Once during the discussion, kejriwalji heaped all blame on environmentalist and pointed fingers at Diwan Singh for such standoffs. On this the 8 members in the team replied that we are simple residents, not environmentalists, and only demanding what is rightful for us, and Diwan Singh is showing us the path for it. We are, rather, thankful to him for helping us. Mr. Kejriwal then said that public would decide through Mohalla sabha. To this we suggested that some decisions have to be taken by experts, officials who are appointed for this job. That's why the government is elected so that it can use the public resources to do research, analysis and come to right decision. Making a populist call in a public gathering, and taking decision based on that, would only spoil the face of city for future. And, if he is so keen on every decision based on populist call, why do we have officials and experts in the secretariat for? Let janta (public) sit in the Secretariat and oust the officials and ministers from there. (On this, there was no response from the CM.)"Diwan SinghConvenor, Mundka Kirari harit AbhiyanMember, Dwarka Water Bodies CommitteeYamuna SatyagrahaRidge Bachao AndolanCampaign for Preservation of CommonsOn Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 6:22 PM, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:regardsKejriwal is a Megalomaniac, he will curtail every individual rights and destroy every institution which objects his functioning.As said, above, medias are bribed by using public money in the form of large scale advt. Court has already taken a partisan stand by relying the words of present C.J. Remember Only judge Like H.R Khanna stood against emergency when majority Judges are in praise of such rule.Suffering individuals in Delhi is outnumbered in this case because majority of people are already using public conveyance system. No body listening the miseries of suffering people. Many people who depend their own vehicles for daily profession are deprived completely.In fact an undeclared emergency is going on in Delhi by curtailing the fundamental rights of large number of citizens. Kejriwal is a New Born Hitler ( don't be surprised He will become a Hitler and rule this country in future, any doubt then refer life history of Hitler ) see How Kejriwal shut the mouth of all institutions by lies and false hood , and how he destroyed all individual rights by highlighting common good.Dear All ,If any body has tried to board Metro train during peak hours then they will realize the exact problem. Delhi public are suffering and cursing Kejriwal and his company. Public will not violate rule as they don't want to pay hefty fine. This is nothing new in Delhi as general Public avoid spiting in Metro stations on account of strict monitoring. People is not going to violate any law if strict punishment is provided. If Kejriwal Ban all male from getting out of their home by insisting hefty fine against violations with strict monitoring none will come out.If medias and court has shown blind eye on such bans whole world will think that every thing is fine.http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
P. Sureshan,
Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India,
NLC( India ) Law Office
No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph: 9818083219,7838598740,8802797432,01132081075 ( call time -strictly 4 P.M to 8 P.M on all working days) Extremely sorry if not attended call outside this time limitOn Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:Dear Shanti Bhushan ji
1) They will not allow the "people" to access your statements.
Already AAP-Govt is regularly giving full page advts to all newspapers
like HT, ToI etc,to compromise their editorial independence. Their
organisations "dominate" Facebook and half the media/TV channels are
directly in the control of their godfathers. They use professional
SocialMedia people to run their campaign - unlike your amateurs.
2) They have taken long term steps to protect themselves in judiciary
at all levels (starting from MLA selections all the way to co-opting
senior advocates/SGs like Harish Salve, Indira Jaisingh, Gopal
Subramaniam etc to represent them at their enhanced legal fees.
3) AAP has understood the science of using public money, like it is
going out of fashion, to achieve its ends.What can your poor
jhola-wallah brigades do against this ?
Sarbajit
On 1/9/16, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is not a matter for a law suit.But people have to be told about these ill
> conceived actions of the govt.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 09-Jan-2016, at 1:04 am, Kumar Arun <kumar2786@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Shriman Shanti Bhushan ji,
>>
>> You are an accomplished attorney. At the least you can bring lawsuit
>> against Kejriwal and his puppets, can't you?
>>
>> Dr. Kumar Arun
>> India Heritage Foundation
>> facebook: Bharatiya Patriots
>>
>> From: shantibhush@gmail.com
>> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:25:02 +0530
>> CC: shalinibgupta@hotmail.com; prashantbhush@gmail.com;
>> yogendra.yadav@gmail.com; anandkumar1@hotmail.com;
>> media@swarajabhiyan.org
>> To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
>> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] GoI's 'Safar' data exposes AAP's #ODD-EVEN flop
>> show
>>
>> They have allowed garbage to accumulate as never before and encouraged
>> more and more jhuggis to come up assuring them that once they costruct
>> even on public land they will not allow their demo,it ion.Worst form of
>> vote bank politics.Even in odd even ,as the latest TV advertisement of
>> Arvind Kejriwal shows they have encouraged people to switch from cars to
>> motorcycles.Maybe these bikes could be more polluting than the cars.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 07-Jan-2016, at 1:17 pm, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here is the official data from Ministry of Earth Sciences QAM project
>> "Safar" in the form of a graphic image showing ODD-EVEN is a complete
>> flopshow.
>>
>> Immediately on ODD-EVEN the pollution went up.from Jan-01 and kept
>> climbing and was double that of the previous year in the same period.
>> ODD-EVEN had a negligible impact.
>>
>> The question is WHAT has AAP Govt. of Delhi done in the last 1 year which
>> has generated such a huge increase in air pollution in space of 1 year ?
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>> <7-1-2016-PM2.5-DELHI2014-2015 comparison-12AM.jpg>
>>
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit:
>> "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit:
>> "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help:
>> https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW :
>> http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in