Sunday, March 23, 2014

Re: [IAC#RG] Nodal agency for Cyber Security u/s 70-A or 70-B IT Act

Dear Sarabjit,

Thanks for your email and also for unrelenting pursuit in national interest.

Your complete silence on political activities during last 4 crucial months is in vivid contrast to your previous e-enthusiasm. This is especially true wrt Arvind & his cohorts or Modi or SoniaG. This is despite medical treatment of SoniaG in USA and US court seeking her passport to establish truth of her US entry. Why this loud silence?

This query is only by way of positive inquisitiveness.

Enjoy.

On Mar 23, 2014 12:46 PM, "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
DEAR IAC Members and friends,

Today, 23-March is SHAHEED day, the day our HRA heroes were hanged by foreign rulers on our own soil.

Today, let us all pledge not to ever repeat the mistake of allowing foreigners (or through their lackeys) to rule us again.

Today for those uninformed who say that IAC does nothing for India, please read the email below.

Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: sarbajit roy <mail.sarbajitroy@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:27:43 +0530
Subject: Re: Nodal agency for Cyber Security u/s 70-A or 70-B IT Act
To: "Manasi Kumari Dash (Google Docs)" <manasidash4@gmail.com>, Arun Mehta <arun.mehta@gmail.com>, india-gii <india-gii@india-gii.org>, "sroy.mb" <sroy.mb@gmail.com>, secretary@deity.gov.in, grai@deity.gov.in, drgovind@nic.in
Cc: bsrinath@mit.gov.in, akaushik@mit.gov.in

Dear Dr. Arun Mehta and Ors. on India-GII

Please find the link :-) !!!!!  Our years of silent work (out of media spotlight) for the nation are achieved

http://deity.gov.in/sites/upload_files/dit/files/GSR_19(E).pdf

This shows that Ministry / DeITy still works fast despite Ministers and the bloody foreign financed lobbyist NGOs.

It's God's will that this 16.01.2014 notification came 7 days after I filed my first counter- pleadings in the NUCLEAR INSTITUTIONS SPYING case on 09.01.2014.

Thanks
In solidarity,

Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
India Against Corruption

On 4/28/12, sarbajit roy <mail.sarbajitroy@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> The Department of Information Technology
> Government of India
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 28-April-2012
>
> Kind Attn:
> (1) Mr. B.J.Srinath (Scientist-G),
> (2) Mr.A.Kaushik (designated Central Public Information Officer/DoIT)
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I have yesterday received by email a Press Release issued by BAPSI.ORG
> concerning certain alleged cyber security incidents attacking India's
> defence and security cyber infrastructure. The said document, if true,
> is certainly worrying as it is made out as if the Union Government is
> incompetent and sleeping while our enemies like China attacked India's
> cyber assets  with impunity.
>
> In view of the detailed efforts by that organization to identify,
> using the RTI, the affected computers referred to by Hon'ble Raksha
> Mantri-ji in Parliament,  it seems that there is an ex-facie case to
> suggest that the NTRO (National Technical Research Organisation) is
> functioning as the nodal agency responsible for protecting India's
> critical cyber resources - and possibly without any formal
> notification u/s 70-A of the Information Technology (IT) Act 2000/2008
> s mandated.
>
> I am reliably given to understand that you are in possession of a copy
> of the updated declared list of protected  computer resources which is
> duly notified, qv. 70-A IT Act,  in the Official Gazette from time to
> time. As this is a public document of vital public interest, I request
> you to kindly immediately publish the same suo-moto on your website
> under the RTI Act, specifically under section 4 of that Act so that
> affected citizens like myself are not inconvenienced to formally apply
> in RTI or Citizens Charter for the same (or its underlying
> notifications) .
>
> Alternatively, you may kindly send me the contact details (preferably
> with official email ID) of the head of whichever agency has been
> notified to maintain this list so that I can pursue it with them under
> the Citizens Charter.
>
> I would appreciate my instant email communication being electronically
> acknowledged and initially processed within 5 working days as
> mentioned in the Manual of Office Procedure.
>
> With best wishes and regards
>
> Er. Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024.
>
> Tel ; 09311448069
>
> On 4/27/12, Manasi Kumari Dash (Google Docs) <manasidash4@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've shared an item with you:
>>
>> Press Release-China hacking-draft.odt
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t2ffU7tw0iFsoRiRCxGrlhmLmDhimG9EBMF3JcQLZ64/edit
>>
>> It's not an attachment -- it's stored online at Google Docs. To open this
>> document, just click the link above.
>>
>>
>


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Nodal agency for Cyber Security u/s 70-A or 70-B IT Act

Nice to see your post after a long gap.


On 23 March 2014 12:38, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
DEAR IAC Members and friends,

Today, 23-March is SHAHEED day, the day our HRA heroes were hanged by foreign rulers on our own soil.

Today, let us all pledge not to ever repeat the mistake of allowing foreigners (or through their lackeys) to rule us again.

Today for those uninformed who say that IAC does nothing for India, please read the email below.

Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: sarbajit roy <mail.sarbajitroy@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:27:43 +0530
Subject: Re: Nodal agency for Cyber Security u/s 70-A or 70-B IT Act
To: "Manasi Kumari Dash (Google Docs)" <manasidash4@gmail.com>, Arun Mehta <arun.mehta@gmail.com>, india-gii <india-gii@india-gii.org>, "sroy.mb" <sroy.mb@gmail.com>, secretary@deity.gov.in, grai@deity.gov.in, drgovind@nic.in
Cc: bsrinath@mit.gov.in, akaushik@mit.gov.in

Dear Dr. Arun Mehta and Ors. on India-GII

Please find the link :-) !!!!!  Our years of silent work (out of media spotlight) for the nation are achieved

http://deity.gov.in/sites/upload_files/dit/files/GSR_19(E).pdf

This shows that Ministry / DeITy still works fast despite Ministers and the bloody foreign financed lobbyist NGOs.

It's God's will that this 16.01.2014 notification came 7 days after I filed my first counter- pleadings in the NUCLEAR INSTITUTIONS SPYING case on 09.01.2014.

Thanks
In solidarity,

Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
India Against Corruption

On 4/28/12, sarbajit roy <mail.sarbajitroy@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> The Department of Information Technology
> Government of India
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 28-April-2012
>
> Kind Attn:
> (1) Mr. B.J.Srinath (Scientist-G),
> (2) Mr.A.Kaushik (designated Central Public Information Officer/DoIT)
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I have yesterday received by email a Press Release issued by BAPSI.ORG
> concerning certain alleged cyber security incidents attacking India's
> defence and security cyber infrastructure. The said document, if true,
> is certainly worrying as it is made out as if the Union Government is
> incompetent and sleeping while our enemies like China attacked India's
> cyber assets  with impunity.
>
> In view of the detailed efforts by that organization to identify,
> using the RTI, the affected computers referred to by Hon'ble Raksha
> Mantri-ji in Parliament,  it seems that there is an ex-facie case to
> suggest that the NTRO (National Technical Research Organisation) is
> functioning as the nodal agency responsible for protecting India's
> critical cyber resources - and possibly without any formal
> notification u/s 70-A of the Information Technology (IT) Act 2000/2008
> s mandated.
>
> I am reliably given to understand that you are in possession of a copy
> of the updated declared list of protected  computer resources which is
> duly notified, qv. 70-A IT Act,  in the Official Gazette from time to
> time. As this is a public document of vital public interest, I request
> you to kindly immediately publish the same suo-moto on your website
> under the RTI Act, specifically under section 4 of that Act so that
> affected citizens like myself are not inconvenienced to formally apply
> in RTI or Citizens Charter for the same (or its underlying
> notifications) .
>
> Alternatively, you may kindly send me the contact details (preferably
> with official email ID) of the head of whichever agency has been
> notified to maintain this list so that I can pursue it with them under
> the Citizens Charter.
>
> I would appreciate my instant email communication being electronically
> acknowledged and initially processed within 5 working days as
> mentioned in the Manual of Office Procedure.
>
> With best wishes and regards
>
> Er. Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024.
>
> Tel ; 09311448069
>
> On 4/27/12, Manasi Kumari Dash (Google Docs) <manasidash4@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've shared an item with you:
>>
>> Press Release-China hacking-draft.odt
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t2ffU7tw0iFsoRiRCxGrlhmLmDhimG9EBMF3JcQLZ64/edit
>>
>> It's not an attachment -- it's stored online at Google Docs. To open this
>> document, just click the link above.
>>
>>
>


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Kiran Shaheen
 

I carry a torch in one hand
And a bucket of water in the other:
With these things I am going to set fire to Heaven
And put out the flames of Hell
So that voyagers to God can rip the veils
And see the real goal.......
Rabia (Rabi'a Al-'Adawiyya)

 

 

[IAC#RG] Nodal agency for Cyber Security u/s 70-A or 70-B IT Act

DEAR IAC Members and friends,

Today, 23-March is SHAHEED day, the day our HRA heroes were hanged by foreign rulers on our own soil.

Today, let us all pledge not to ever repeat the mistake of allowing foreigners (or through their lackeys) to rule us again.

Today for those uninformed who say that IAC does nothing for India, please read the email below.

Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: sarbajit roy <mail.sarbajitroy@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:27:43 +0530
Subject: Re: Nodal agency for Cyber Security u/s 70-A or 70-B IT Act
To: "Manasi Kumari Dash (Google Docs)" <manasidash4@gmail.com>, Arun Mehta <arun.mehta@gmail.com>, india-gii <india-gii@india-gii.org>, "sroy.mb" <sroy.mb@gmail.com>, secretary@deity.gov.in, grai@deity.gov.in, drgovind@nic.in
Cc: bsrinath@mit.gov.in, akaushik@mit.gov.in

Dear Dr. Arun Mehta and Ors. on India-GII

Please find the link :-) !!!!!  Our years of silent work (out of media spotlight) for the nation are achieved

http://deity.gov.in/sites/upload_files/dit/files/GSR_19(E).pdf

This shows that Ministry / DeITy still works fast despite Ministers and the bloody foreign financed lobbyist NGOs.

It's God's will that this 16.01.2014 notification came 7 days after I filed my first counter- pleadings in the NUCLEAR INSTITUTIONS SPYING case on 09.01.2014.

Thanks
In solidarity,

Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
India Against Corruption

On 4/28/12, sarbajit roy <mail.sarbajitroy@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> The Department of Information Technology
> Government of India
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 28-April-2012
>
> Kind Attn:
> (1) Mr. B.J.Srinath (Scientist-G),
> (2) Mr.A.Kaushik (designated Central Public Information Officer/DoIT)
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I have yesterday received by email a Press Release issued by BAPSI.ORG
> concerning certain alleged cyber security incidents attacking India's
> defence and security cyber infrastructure. The said document, if true,
> is certainly worrying as it is made out as if the Union Government is
> incompetent and sleeping while our enemies like China attacked India's
> cyber assets  with impunity.
>
> In view of the detailed efforts by that organization to identify,
> using the RTI, the affected computers referred to by Hon'ble Raksha
> Mantri-ji in Parliament,  it seems that there is an ex-facie case to
> suggest that the NTRO (National Technical Research Organisation) is
> functioning as the nodal agency responsible for protecting India's
> critical cyber resources - and possibly without any formal
> notification u/s 70-A of the Information Technology (IT) Act 2000/2008
> s mandated.
>
> I am reliably given to understand that you are in possession of a copy
> of the updated declared list of protected  computer resources which is
> duly notified, qv. 70-A IT Act,  in the Official Gazette from time to
> time. As this is a public document of vital public interest, I request
> you to kindly immediately publish the same suo-moto on your website
> under the RTI Act, specifically under section 4 of that Act so that
> affected citizens like myself are not inconvenienced to formally apply
> in RTI or Citizens Charter for the same (or its underlying
> notifications) .
>
> Alternatively, you may kindly send me the contact details (preferably
> with official email ID) of the head of whichever agency has been
> notified to maintain this list so that I can pursue it with them under
> the Citizens Charter.
>
> I would appreciate my instant email communication being electronically
> acknowledged and initially processed within 5 working days as
> mentioned in the Manual of Office Procedure.
>
> With best wishes and regards
>
> Er. Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024.
>
> Tel ; 09311448069
>
> On 4/27/12, Manasi Kumari Dash (Google Docs) <manasidash4@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've shared an item with you:
>>
>> Press Release-China hacking-draft.odt
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t2ffU7tw0iFsoRiRCxGrlhmLmDhimG9EBMF3JcQLZ64/edit
>>
>> It's not an attachment -- it's stored online at Google Docs. To open this
>> document, just click the link above.
>>
>>
>

Friday, March 14, 2014

[IAC#RG] Kejriwal: India's biggest scam

Kejriwal: India’s biggest scam

on MARCH 11, 2014 · in POLITICS

BY RSN SINGH

This article is going to be based on facts and facts alone. It purports to clearly decipher the process of subversion and use of Kejriwal and his associates by powers and countries inimical to India. Sadly, as invariably the case, there are vested interests at the highest political levels in India, who are part of the design.

The flowchart below gives out the link of foreign funding and subversion of Kejriwal and associates. Each of the links given in the flowchart are backed by documents.

Kejriwal - India's biggest Scam Images - 1

LINK-1, 2 & 3: CIA, Rockfeller Foundation and Ford Foundation, Magsaysay Award

A US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) secret document (declassified) given below, duly signed by the then Director Allen W. Dulles clearly shows the link between CIA and Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation and Magsaysay Award. It may be mentioned that Dulles was the longest serving Director of CIA from 1953 to 1961. Even in the citation of Kejriwal for Magsaysay Award, the first reference was made to CIA.

Link-1: CIA and Ford Foundation

Link-1: CIA and Ford Foundation

The link between CIA and Ford Foundation and Magsaysay Award is yet again reinforced by a secret (declassified) document. The document clearly shows that how so called intellectuals, professors and students of target countries are financially enticed by the Ford Foundation on behalf of CIA to avail education facilities in the US clearly with the purpose of subversion.

Link-5 : Ford Foundation and Kejriwal

Link-5 : Ford Foundation and Kejriwal

The grants given by Ford Foundation in 2002 to various Indian entities are given below in the accessed document. Arvind Kejriwal’s NGO ‘Sampoorna Parivartan’ and CSDS (Center for the Study of Developing Societies) have been granted $80,000 and the $250,000 respectively. Key associates of Arvind Kejriwal like Yogendra Yadav have been functionaries of the CSDS. What makes this funding to Kejriwal a criminal activity is the fact that he in 2002 was still a government servant and therefore not entitled to receive it. Government servants are not permitted to float NGOs without due permission.

Kejriwal, while on study leave and availing full government salary started Parivartan along with Manish Sisodia in 2000-2001. On its website, Parivartan on 10-March-2009 declared that it is not an NGO or a registered organization, and for Income Tax purposes it was an Association of Persons. However, in 2002 the website declared the organization was registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 and was exempt from Income Tax in Section 80G of 12A of IT Act. This is a clear fraud on India and Indians (Click here to see more).

Further, under the banner of Parivartan, Kejriwal received funds from World Bank for a Jan Sunvai campaign even as the organization was not registered. It is again a criminal act. This funding nearly coincides with the period of Kejriwal resigning from service (not accepted) in 2006, and Ford Foundation funding and grant of Magsaysay Award. In fact, Kejriwal got the Magsaysay Award shortly after he featured in the World Bank report of 2005 (page: 29-33).

Kejriwal branched off from Parivartan to establish yet another NGO, Kabir. As per the documents, Kabir was established on 15 August 2005. This was again illegal, as Kejriwal continued to be in government service. The subversive agenda of the Ford Foundation is quite clear in the contradictions in dates between financial documents declared by Kabir and Ford Foundation. While Kabir claims that the NGO began its operations on 15 August 2005 in which the contribution from Ford Foundation was Rs.43,48,036/-, whereas the annual report of Ford Foundation claims to have made a contribution to Kabir to the tune of $172,000 on 15 July 2005. It is not only intriguing that the Ford Foundation funding to Kabir began from the very first year of its operation, but the money was given one month before its birth. The fraud is evident from the two sets of documents of Kabir and Ford Foundation, given below.

Kejriwal - India's biggest Scam Images - 5

Link-1: Ford Foundation funding to Kabir and Fraud. Source: Ford Foundation Annual report of 2005 (http://www.fordfoundation.org/pdfs/library/ar2005.pdf)

As per Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) submission made by the Kabir in its annual return indicates that between 2005 and 2011, only Rs.75,54,006 were received from Ford Foundation in two tranches; i.e. 2005-06: Rs. 43,48,036 on 15-July-2005, 2006-07: Rs. 32,05,970 on 12-Dec-2006. It also shows a sum of $1,97,000 was not accepted as Kabir had become a political movement by then. It may be reminded that it was at this time that lot of questions were being raised about illegal foreign funding to Kejriwal’s political activities. Kabir tried to mislead by removing or omitting all details from website regarding its funding from Ford Foundation in the year 2007-2008, 2009-2010.

However, the fraud can be nailed by visiting the Ford Foundation website http://www.fordfoundation.org/grants/grantdetails?grantid=107117(again suppressed), which clearly indicates that in the year 2007-2008, Kabir received $1,97,000 and the very next year Rs.60,75,149 (Kabir website, details suppressed again).

The hide and seek being played on the net by Kabir and Ford Foundation is testimony to the fraud. In fact, Parivartan and Kabir, suddenly shutdown their websites after coming under scrutiny in 2012.

Kejriwal and dubious American funding

Kejriwal received the Ashoka fellowship in 2004. He conveyed an impression that the outreach to him was by an Indian organization. In reality Ashoka is an US registered organization, whose strategic partners include McKinsey & Company, Corporate Executive Board and Latham and Watkins (Ref: https://www.ashoka.org/sites/ashoka/files/form990-2004.pdf). Since the Cold War, this organization has been engaged in creating human assets for expanding American influence.

Kejriwal - India's biggest Scam Images - 6

It emerges that after liberal funding from various Western sources, Kejriwal decided to send his resignation from government service in 2006. This story began in 2002, when his ‘Sampooran Parivartan’ was given $80,000 (Ref: http://www.fordfoundation.org/pdfs/library/ar2002.pdf, Page: 104)

Kejriwal - India's biggest Scam Images - 7

$80,000 in 2002 was equivalent to Kejriwal’s 15 years’ salary. Moreover, the biggest fraud is that the donors, i.e. organizations that funded Kejriwal’s so-called NGOs were the decision makers in the award of his Magsaysay Award. This includes the CIA. Further, the representative of Ford Foundation on India Steven Solnick admitted on 31st August 2012 that the Magsaysay Award for Kejriwal was funded by them.

Subsequently, foreign money began to flow into Kejriwal’s NGO. As per the response to an RTI filed by a website Beyond Headlines, the other foreign contributors to Kejriwal’s NGO ‘Kabir’ were Ford Foundation (Rs 86,61,742), PRIA (Rs 2,37,035), Manjunath Shanmugam Trust (Rs 3,70,000), Dutch Embassy (Rs 19,61,968), Association for India’s Development (Rs 15,00,000), India’s Friends Association (Rs 7,86,500), United Nations Development Programme (Rs12,52,742) while Rs 11,35,857 were collected from individual donations between 2007 to 2010.

The link 6 in the Chart at the start indicates recipients of the funds by the Dutch entity Humanistic Institute for Cooperation with Developing Countries (HIVOS). It provided € 1.3 million between 2008 and 2012. Of these more than half, i.e. DISHA, GKVP, SAFAR, MAHITI, SWATI, and UTHAN are active in Gujarat. The others like CJP run by Teesta Setalvad and ANHAD run by Shabnam Hashmi are known for their virulent anti-Modi campaign.

HIVOS in turn is the highest recipient of funds from Ford Foundation. It has an office in India receiving $1.2 million (Ref.:http://www.fordfoundation.org/Grants/Search?searchphrase=kabeer). HIVOS also funded Kejriwal’s Parivartan (http://www.hivos.nl/eng/content/view/full/96/(sector)/10000025/(country)/10000011).

There are various other organizations funded by the Dutch government i.e. PSO Association and PRIA. These organizations ostensibly are engaged in ‘development and social work’, however their main purpose is to promote American agenda. The US adopts the Dutch route in various target countries so that suspicions are not aroused. HIVOS receives €27 million from the Dutch government and funds the PRIA, which is also a Ford Foundation partner. Another PSO partner Soliaridad also funds PRIA. PRIA funded Kejriwal as well. Many countries have compelled the PSO to windup its activities as they have been found to be intrusive.

Another Dutch funded organization is PANOS, which has seven offices in South Asia. This too is recipient of funds from Ford Foundation and its main purpose is to manipulate the media ‘in South Asia’. So is it surprising that a segment of Indian electronic media has gone to vulgar extent in amplifying Kejriwal? The funding of the Dutch entities as mentioned by the Ford Foundation is evidenced by the document placed below:

Kejriwal - India's biggest Scam Images - 8

Collusion between CIA and Kejriwal

All the documents above suggest the alleged systematic subversion and creation of Kejriwal by the CIA through the Ford Foundation and the Dutch entities. A CIA document clearly establishes as to how CIA loans officers to Ford Foundation.

Kejriwal - India's biggest Scam Images - 9

It has also been established that CIA operatives operate through the academic route. One such academic researcher Ms Shimrit Lee was associated with Kejriwal’s Kabir NGO in the garb of doing research on ‘Public Power: India and Other Democracies’. Ms Lee specializes in Tahrir Square type demonstrations that we are now witnessing in Ukraine. She has been active in Cairo, Haifa, Chad and Israel, India and US. It is she who introduced the ideas of Mohalla Committees and brought the Arab Spring technology to India to launch Kejriwal. Ms Lee’s photograph is given below:

Kejriwal - India's biggest Scam Images - 10

That the US has been using the Dutch for pushing its agenda in India, which includes destabilization of India’s Northeast is known. It is evident by the bonhomie between Netherlands and various Naga outfits, particularly the NSCN (IM). It was the NSCN (IM) which took umbrage when on 17-July-2002 in a written reply to a question in parliament, the late Digvijay Singh then Minister of External Affairs said that Netherlands was one of the countries where terrorists have safe heavens besides Pakistan. It may also be reiterated that the NSCN (IM) always insists on holding talks with the Indian government in Amsterdam. It is also well known as to how the CIA and the Dutch Intelligence Agency (BVD – Binenlandise Veiligheidsdienst) connived in allowing AQ Khan to steal nuclear secrets from URENCO, site at Almeto in Netherlands, only with the purpose of balancing Pakistan with India in nuclear capability during the Cold War. It is through this kind of geopolitical balancing in various regions that the US maintains its lead role.

Just as in the case of lead role by geopolitical balancing the Western countries maintain their supremacy in global economy through the ‘offshore financial centers’. These centers thrive on black money of the developing world. Was it for this reason that Kejriwal was created to kill Ramdev’s movement for recovery of black money stashed abroad? During the entire Anna agitation, not even once, the issue of black money in foreign soil was raised.

In pursuit of the CIA agenda there are Indians who have been partnering Kejriwal. Is it a coincidence that a former Admiral also a recipient of Magsaysay Award accompanied Kejriwal when he filed his nomination from New Delhi constituency? This Admiral, whose daughter married to a Pakistani, has been in the forefront against India’s ‘nuclear development’. Is it a mere coincidence that the closest aides of Kejriwal are recipients of funding from Ford Foundation. Is it also a mere coincidence that Kejriwal never served out of Delhi during his government service, and helping him in this bid was none other than Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, who wrote a letter to ensure the same? Is it also a mere coincidence that Arvind Kejriwal is a protégé of Aruna Roy, another recipient of Magsaysay Award, and a member of Sonia’s National Advisory Council?

Arvind Kejriwal is therefore not a political threat but a security threat to this country, his main objective being to destabilize India to perpetuate US agenda.

Arvind Kejriwal is India’s biggest scam.

(RSN Singh is a former military intelligence officer who later served in the Research & Analysis Wing. The author of two books: Asian Strategic and Military Perspective and Military Factor in Pakistan, he is also a Guest Blogger with Canary Trap. The opinions expressed by the author and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of Canary Trap or any employee thereof)

http://www.canarytrap.in/2014/03/11/kejriwal-indias-biggest-scam/

Thursday, March 6, 2014

[IAC#RG] Public Notice: Beware of Jack-in-the-Box jokers

Dear Friends

The elections have been announced, model code of conduct is in force and it is widely expected that this will be India's dirtiest election in a long time. Already Congress sock-puppets are popping up like Jack-in-the-box jokers to fool voters by claiming association with IAC.

Here are the facts briefly :-

1)That we are indisputably the owners and promoters of the "India Against Corruption" (hereinafter called "IAC") "movement" since 26-February-2007. The name of IAC is closely and indelibly continually associated since then with (and vests in) Mr. Sarbajit Roy (National Convenor) and Mr. Veeresh Malik (Co-Convenor), supported by a core team ('aka' "Core Committee") of leading Free Speech activists in India located in several widely separated States of India. Recently eminent activist Mr.Chanderkant J. Karira is also nominated as a Co-Convenor.

2) That the IAC "movement" originated on 26 Feb-2007 when a motley group of RTI activists gathered outside CIC office in strange circumstances and agreed to do something for the national good as "India Against Corruption", which name was proposed on the spot by National Convenor. This task was exclusively taken forward by Sarbajit Roy and Veeresh Malik when the others dropped out.

2) That in the year 2010, the IAC leadership made modest donations to a registered public trust "Public Cause Research Foundation" (www.pcrf.in) to conduct a modest anti-corruption publicity campaign for it (in name and style of "India Against Corruption") to educate the masses after the conclusion of the Commonwealth Games 2010 in New Delhi on 14.October.2010 and to thereby circulate evidence of widespread  corruption in these Games gathered by IAC. The financial details of the aforesaid arrangement ("PCRF has taken up a new activity known as "India Against Corruption") are accessible in the public domain and also reflect in the audited accounts of the PCRF. The campaign was so popular that large sums of money later came to be deposited into PCRF's account under the head "India Against Corruption" and many ordinary citizens all over India volunteered as unpaid workers for the anti-corruption cause and the local campaigns which sprang up spontaneously using social media.

3) The main promoters of the PCRF (ie. Mr. Arvind Kejriwal and Mr. Manish Sisodia) are equally Free Speech activists and were quite well known to the promoters of IAC since long before 2007. On 9.Dec.2010 when the IAC came to know that PCRF (on 1.Dec.2010 and 7.Dec.2010) had enlarged the scope of their publicity campaign to include other mischievous "anti-corruption" campaigns and NGO's under IAC's banners and name, the IAC expressly communicated to M/s. PCRF (then acting as the "Secretariat" for the pan-Indian anti-corruption platform) that IAC's martyrs, banners and name should not be associated with independent causes (such as for "Jan Lokpal Bill" or "Return Black Money" campaign of M/s. Anna Hazare or Baba Ramdev respectively brought in by PCRF) not linked to CWG-2010. Due to some differences within PCRF (specifically their Trustee Ms. Kiran Bedi who involved Anna Hazare and was a vested interest effectively acting as Anna's PR agent) the PCRF could only accede to IAC's demand from 6.Feb.2011 onwards.

4) That on 5.April.2011 at New Delhi, Mr. Anna Hazare's staff objected to display of IAC's revolutionary banners (independently put up by one "Baba Ramdev") at Mr.Hazare's fast venue and disrespectfully caused these banners with HRA images of Shahids Bhagat Singh and Chandra Shekhar Azad etc. over the slogan "Sarfaroshi ki tamanna ab hamaare dil mein hai, Dekhna hai zor kitna baazu-e-qaatil mein hai" be torn down because Television media managers were suggesting that such bold banners detracted from their careful media positioning of Anna as a so-called "Gandhian".

5) The veteran socialist leader Sharad Yadav, outside whose party office the protest was taking place, was also abused and heckled by Mr.Hazare's followers that day who portrayed  that he was "Sharad Pawar" who was named to the Drafting Committee.

6) That all these insulting episodes caused IAC to lodge (the same evening) a Police Complaint against Mr.Anna Hazare and Ms.Kiran Bedi for sedition and anti-national activity which was promptly acknowledged by Special CP of Delhi Police. In these circumstances, Mr. Anna Hazare's Jan Lokpal Bill campaign was henceforth known as "Team Anna". IAC has never had any dealings with Mr. Anna Hazare. Mr. Hazare never had any permission to use IAC's name, trademarks and logos for his campaigns.

7) That with effect from 26.November.2012 the PCRF promoters launched a political party "Aam Aadmi Party" and all PCRF's non-financial assets generated for the aforesaid "India Against Corruption" campaign are exclusively with us and with nobody else. That regrettably the PCRF seems to be nonfunctional as a Trust thereafter due to politically motivated criminal cases being lodged against its main founding Trustees, and hence its latest audited accounts till 31.03.2013 are not known to the public or to IAC.

8) On 2.Nov.2012 IAC National Convenor set up the website "www.indiaagainstcorruption.net.in" to be the official website of IAC. For legal reasons the previous website "www.indiaagainstcorruption.org" (it is registered in USA) is mutually
disabled as IAC does not want to take on its associated liabilities. The official website of IAC is also "www.indiaagainstcorruption.org.in" which was recovered on 6.Dec.2013
from a cyber-squatter and is now the IAC's preferred information website. Another such recovered domain is "
www.indiaagainstcorruption.us" as IAC will be filing cases against US bodies who are blatantly anti-Indian.

9) Shri. Anna Hazare has no direct role to play in IAC's affairs,and IAC has never supported his Jan Lokpal Bill demand and its connected activities. IAC's views about the persons who control Mr. Hazare today is well known, and IAC does not endorse any political actions by Shri Hazare or activities of any political party including any of our friends formerly in IAC.

10) "India Against Corruption" is today an apolitical, secular, socialist, Republican, conservative, revolutionary, Hindutva movement working for the national good. (NB: Hindutva is an ancient inclusive way of life inherently capable of harmoniously accommodating all faiths, religions and beliefs or non-beliefs).

For India Against Corruption

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

[IAC#RG] Fwd: EVM paper trails

To: Harendra Singh <har..@yahoo.com>

IAC is not working with Maulik Bharat on this. We are 2 separate entities.

EVMs are quire simple to manipulate, so there is no question of IAC
taking it up with EC. There is a lot of disinformation on this by being
spread by Dr. Subramaniam Swamy and his CIA circus.

Printout trail will not make a difference, one way or the other. More
disinfo by Swamy and foreign friends.

Paper slips are not needed by established votebanks. We have other
(far simpler) methods.

On 3/4/14, Harendra Singh <harendra_singh@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It is understood that IAC & Maulik Bharat have been taking up various
> election related issues with CEC. There was also a discussion on the
> possibility of voting machines being tempered with. It was stated that any
> manipulation of machines will be taken care of by issueing a printed
> slip/paper trail, indicating the party to which vote has been registered,
> to the voter. However such an arrangment can have other problems.
> It is well known that parties pay cash to voters, however in the absence of
> any proof the voter can still vote for his choice of candidate if he so
> desires, once the paper slips indicating the party for which the vote has
> been registered are issued, then parties will obviously demand slips and
> then make the payment. In other words selling the vote will be more
> practical and reliable. In any case since the data in machine chips can be
> manipulated remotely after machines are sealed such paper trails will serve
> no purpose.
> It is therefor suggested that Election Commission be approached and
> requested to refrain from issueing any slip, counterfoil, paper trail or
> whatso ever which indicates the party to which vote has been registered.
> Harendra Singh

Monday, March 3, 2014

Re: [IAC#RG] कैसे बनाया अमेरिका ने अरविंद केजरीवाल को, जानिए पूरी कहानी! - लेखक : संदीप देव

It is understood that IAC & Maulik Bharat have been taking up various election related issues with CEC. There was also a discussion on the possibility of voting machines being tempered with. It was stated that any manipulation of machines will be taken care of by issueing a printed slip/paper trail, indicating the party to which vote has been registered,  to the voter. However such an arrangment can have other problems.
It is well known that parties pay cash to voters, however in the absence of any proof the voter can still vote for his choice of candidate if he so desires, once the paper slips indicating the party for which the vote has been registered are issued, then parties will obviously demand slips and then make the payment. In other words selling the vote will be more practical and reliable. In any case since the data in machine chips can be manipulated remotely after machines are sealed such paper trails will serve no purpose. 
It is therefor suggested that Election Commission be approached and requested to refrain from issueing any slip, counterfoil, paper trail  or whatso ever which indicates the party to which vote has been registered. 
 Harendra Singh