Monday, August 6, 2012

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Mr. Shailesh Gandhi

Mr Sarbjit sir
                    you might have enmity with Mr. Shailesh Gandhi but dont use this discussion forum for passing remarks for individual enmity with Mr. Gandhi Yours views might be proper according to you but there is also other side which may call you as wrong.
please dont take it as my advice but take it as my opinion which personal
I have gone through Judgment of Justice Sanghi I feel that he wrote judgment which is not proper and the way he wrote about Mr. Gandhi in fact he has lowered down the dignity of human by passing remarks which can be said to scandolous in nature and therefore Justice Sanghi is otherwise eligible for contempt of his own court.


viadya

--- On Mon, 6/8/12, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: Mr. Shailesh Gandhi
To: "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
Date: Monday, 6 August, 2012, 10:24 AM

Dear Karira

I cannot disagree with your observations about the environment
at the CIC and the attitude of the staff / some officers working
there.

Let me expand on this for the benefit of our members.

1) RTI is well and truly almost dead.

2) The CIC is now a garbage processing machine. In Information
Technology terms it is known as "Garbage IN Garbage OUT - GIGO".

3) The CIC is given garbage people as ICs and throws them out as
"sweet smelling" garbage after a few years. The same is true for all
the appeals / complaints and other petitions which are dumped into
the CIC's garbage landfill.

4) Unfortunately the "rest of India", ie everything beyond New Delhi
is an even bigger garbage dump. Which is why officers
will do anything to stay on in Delhi (for the sake of their
children's
education etc.) even it if means having to put up with shit from
their "bosses".

5) When the quantum of shit being dumped on them to process
gets too much, and the bosses keep on spewing out their diarohea,
all the officers can do is pull the DHC chain to stop the train.
.
6) I'm sure that as an engineer, you would agree that in circuit
theory
terms, the path of least resistance is the most efficient / lossless
path.

7) What you really should do is control the garbage petitions (and
petitioners) which are clogging the CIC. Since SG has shown that
the CIC problem cannot be solved from the "supply side " (ie. supply
of
decisions) it must be tackled from the demand side (ie. throttling
the cases reaching the CIC).

8) Finally, I use SG's orders because they truly are the worst
possible
RTI orders, and hence perfect teaching examples. They are the
'outliers'
of RTI decsion delivery. If you have any worse / more egregious orders
please post them up here.  Surely the 3 new ICs will keep us supplied
with enough khurak to enjoy over the next 6 months.

Sarbajit

On Aug 6, 6:57 am, C K Jam <rtiwan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Mr Sarbajit,
>
> Cannot comment on anything else..... but your comment about :
>
> "....admit that these were due to the inputs given to him by
> Mr. Aakshdeep and other Law officers of CIC. "
>
> Never interacted with any other law officer, but Mr Mr Akashdeep - and in
> fact many staff & officers - of the CIC are inept, incompetent, inefficient, corrupt,
> disobedient, insubordinate and also lethargic.
>
> The only path they know is the one of least resistance and the only policy
> they follow while speaking is "speak what your boss wants to hear" so that
> they get a good APAR and continue to relax in the salubrious pinjrapoles located
> at the A K Bhawan / old JNU Campus.
>
> Stop wasting your time on someone who has demitted office and get after
> the ones who are still spoiling the show.
>
> RTIwanted
>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.