Saturday, October 22, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] विकास का पानी

आम आदमी पार्टी  की जब से दिल्ली में सरकार बनी  है तब से पानी मिलेगा , पानी आएगा , 20 हज़ार लीटर मुफ्त मिलेगा जैसे नारे और वायदे सुन और पढ़ रहे हैं --- दिल्ली वालों ने पानी मुफ्त कभी नहीं माँगा --- और आज भी लाखों की आबादी कह रही है कि पैसा लो और पानी दो।  आज भी हम लोग पानी के टैंकर पर निर्भर हैं।  जेई का कहना है कि  इन्तिज़ार करो पाइप -लाइन नयी बिझेगी --- पुरानी पाइप -लाइन कोई 25 साल पुरानी है ,जर्जर और कमजोर है --- दिसंबर -2016 तक का समय दिया है की आपके -- वार्ड न० 142 , राज नगर - 2 की गुरु नानक मार्ग  की पाइप लाइन जब बदलेगी तब यहां के लोगों को साफ़ और स्वच्छ पानी मिल पायेगा --- मुझे तो लगता है की पानी भी राजनीति की भेंट न चढ़ जाए --- आए दिन की एलजी और माननीय के अधिकार को लेकर हो रही तू-तू , मैं - मैं ऐसे में क्या लगता है पानी मिलेगा ?? आपको दीपावली की हार्दिक शुभकामनाएं ---

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Ghulam kundanam <ghulam.kundanam@gmail.com> wrote:
Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (ghulam.kundanam@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

विकास का पानी
……………………

मोटे मोटे बाँध बना,
उपर ही उपर,
गटक जाते विकास,
सत्ता में बैठे लोग,
एक सरकार है ऐसी जो,
नीचे तक पहुँचाती,
विकास का पानी।…

किसी के आकड़ों की,
बाजीगरी में दिखता,
विकास का बढ़ता ग्राफ,
पर एक सरकार ऐसी,
धरातल पर जिसने लिखी,
विकास की कहानी। …
एक सरकार है ऐसी जो,
नीचे तक पहुँचाती,
विकास का पानी।

पूँजीवादी विकास में,
 बढ़ा बेरोजगारी, गरीबी
और कुपोषण,
कमजोर नागरिकों पर,
जुल्म और शोषण,
एक सरकार की,
सर्वांगिण विकास की चर्चा,
हर नागरिक की ज़ुबानी…
एक सरकार है ऐसी जो,
नीचे तक पहुँचाती,
विकास का पानी।

( दिसंबर तक दिल्ली सरकार हर घर को पानी का कनेक्शन देने का काम पूरा
करने वाली है। दिल्ली के आम नागरिक सौभाग्यशाली हैं।  वहाँ के नागरिक और
वहाँ की आम आदमी पार्टी सरकार दोनों विकास की इस उपलब्धि के लिए बधाई के
पात्र है । )
#Kaam_Ki_Baat
#काम_की_बात
Õm - Õnkār - Allāh .God…..
ॐ.ੴ.الله .† …….
Jai Hind ! Jai Jagat (Universe)!
- ग़ुलाम कुन्दनम्
22/10/2016.
 FB Link :-
https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1312291208815557&id=100001040727520&set=a.1150730191638327&_rdr#1312341492143862

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


[IAC#RG] Dubious actions of Ashish Khetan

To:
Chief Minister of Delhi

Dear Chief Minister

A few months back I was very glad to learn that Dialogue and Development Commission of Delhi (DDCD) was being slowly wound down by you, since as usual the Hon'ble L-G had been bypassed to set up this extra-constitutional and illegal NAC type think-tank of fixers created to accommodate yet another AAP journalist like Ashish Khetan as Vice-Chairman at sky-high salaries and perks.

So I was very glad to see that the DDCD was defunct as evidenced from their website showing ZERO members
http://delhi.gov.in/wps/wcm/connect/doit_ddc/DDC/Homenew/About_Us/Composition+of+the+commission

However I was then shocked to learn that Ashish Khetan was still functioning secretly. mostly from his home, continuing to draw his salary and perks, and official files were still being sent to him. One such set of documents Ashish Khetan has no business with was the 125 crore RFID project of MCD's toll tax dept to monitor movement of trucks in Delhi. Yet strangely the files and tenders of MCD were directed by somebody in Delhi to be sent to him to study on behalf of Delhi Govt.

Please be informed that we believe Ashish Khetan is interfering in this project to ensure that some particular vendors / technologies are selected and that corrupt system of considerable under-reporting and cash collection will continue to prevail and the huge air pollution caused by trucks will continue. IAC has repeatedly cautioned you and your Transport Ministers about the unhealthy associations Mr. Ashish Khetan and his DDCD has with the so-called Centre for Science and Environment who are pushing this RFID project through MC Mehta's PILs.

Another atrociously corrupt decision by Ashish Khetan is the DDCD report on unhealthy snack foods. Surely it doesn't need a hack journalist hired by AAP at an inflated salary to tell us that junk foods are super bad for children ? But to tax them as compensation ? What is this if not corruption and moral bankruptcy ? Under these circumstances, and now that the DDCD report is with you since 2nd Oct 2016, IAC wants to know by when your AAP Government will be shutting down / sealing the following establishments and/or their products

a) Pizza Hut
b) Dominoes
c) Kentucky Fried Chicken
d) MacDonalds
e) Burger King
f) Coca Cola
g) Pepsi Cola

India Against Corruption urges you to do so at soon as possible so that our school children are not poisoned by these US MNC chains, and that only healthy, nutritious, organic and non-GMO Indian foods can be provided to them by Indian entrepreneurs.

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy, for
Delhi Dialogue Commission
(an initiative of "India Against Corruption")
B-59 Defence Colony,
New Delhi - 110024

Mob: +91-8010205897
URL : http://www.delhidialoguecommission.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

Very well said

Corrupt political BJP class is just using the U.C.C as another divertory trick to distract people from their failure and jhumlas. The other puppet party AAP is also practiced in such copybook RSS strategms

After 2-1/2 years of BJP-AAP-RSS misrule, crony capitalism and mock nationalism we the people of India are asking Mr.Modi the real questions - 

Where are your promised jobs ?

Where is your ache din ?

Where is the 15 lakhs of black money in every Indian"s bank account ?

Modi sahab you have opened 12 million bank accounts but they are all as empty as your promises. Who will fill these poor people's accounts - that Vijai Mallya who your police allowed to flee the country or your close buddy Adani who owes 72,000+ crores to PSU banks after you politicos forced to lend to him and equallind to debt of all farmer of India?

Here Hindustani farmers are committing suicide, but Modi goes to Mozambike and Brazil to beg for land to grow cheap dal and sugarcane for Adani, Birla.and Bajaj.

Here Modi claims surgical strike in Pakistan but throughout it Adani keeps exporting onion and potato to Pakistan.

The blood of every true Hindustani is boiling over against these kamineey who want to impose their Hindu Rastra through their ghar-waapasi and love-jihaad. But they should first ask themself

Oh ye who speak of 4 wives and 4 children for UCC, first Weep on the condition of your Hindu ruler's own abandoned wife who has to beg her husband's office to know how her husband was given a passport without her.

Is such a man who refuses to confirm his marital status worth of ruling over this proudly secular desh, or should it be a Ramrajya where every Hindu wife will suffer like Modi's ?

Shame Shame Shame,.Hari Om

RP Dalvi


On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Munish

I am proud that India is the most secular country in the world. I believe that all of us should strive to keep it that way and allow each religion (and their adherents) to practice, profess and propagate their religion and conscience (subject to morality, health and public order)

So if anybody objects to polygamy or triple talaq, they should either amend the Constitution or establish that these practices are immoral or unhealthy or opposed to public order. In 66 years of the Republic, AFAIK nobody has been able to do so - because official census data (and as a paedri MD you must know this) shows that Indian Muslims have much lower child mortality rates than Hindus, have longer life-spans than Hindus and the sex-ratio for Muslims is far better than for Hindus.

I don't know which party you are with presently, ie. after AAP,  so I can't comment on "some other parties becoming dominant", but if you are implying that Muslims are changing the demographics through polygamy and triple-talaq the ground-reality is different.

NB : IAC is, and shall always be, "bold" :-)

Sarbajit
.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Dr. Munish Raizada <pedia333@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sarabjit ji:
Your several points are well taken regarding Hindutva and Akhand Hindustan vis a vis objectives of IAC. This is a bold statement. 
However, criticizing RSS will only create diversion. 
Also, opposing UCC at this juncture will harm the nation in long run. In decades, we have an opportunity to bring in UCC. It is unimaginable if some other parties become dominant.


Munish K Raizada, MD, FAAP
Board Certified Neonatologist
Chicago, USA
Phone: USA: +1- 217 720 9331 ; India: +91 98737- 03054
Skype: munish.raizada
Editor-in-Chief:  http://www.newsgram.com/


[IAC#RG] विकास का पानी

विकास का पानी
……………………

मोटे मोटे बाँध बना,
उपर ही उपर,
गटक जाते विकास,
सत्ता में बैठे लोग,
एक सरकार है ऐसी जो,
नीचे तक पहुँचाती,
विकास का पानी।…

किसी के आकड़ों की,
बाजीगरी में दिखता,
विकास का बढ़ता ग्राफ,
पर एक सरकार ऐसी,
धरातल पर जिसने लिखी,
विकास की कहानी। …
एक सरकार है ऐसी जो,
नीचे तक पहुँचाती,
विकास का पानी।

पूँजीवादी विकास में,
बढ़ा बेरोजगारी, गरीबी
और कुपोषण,
कमजोर नागरिकों पर,
जुल्म और शोषण,
एक सरकार की,
सर्वांगिण विकास की चर्चा,
हर नागरिक की ज़ुबानी…
एक सरकार है ऐसी जो,
नीचे तक पहुँचाती,
विकास का पानी।

( दिसंबर तक दिल्ली सरकार हर घर को पानी का कनेक्शन देने का काम पूरा
करने वाली है। दिल्ली के आम नागरिक सौभाग्यशाली हैं। वहाँ के नागरिक और
वहाँ की आम आदमी पार्टी सरकार दोनों विकास की इस उपलब्धि के लिए बधाई के
पात्र है । )
#Kaam_Ki_Baat
#काम_की_बात
Õm - Õnkār - Allāh .God…..
ॐ.ੴ.الله .† …….
Jai Hind ! Jai Jagat (Universe)!
- ग़ुलाम कुन्दनम्
22/10/2016.
FB Link :-
https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1312291208815557&id=100001040727520&set=a.1150730191638327&_rdr#1312341492143862

[IAC#RG] Fwd: PRESS RELEASE: Yet another US inspired party from house of Bhushans ?

Political circles in Uttar Pradesh were abuzz with 2 developments today

1. Trouble in the SP-Yadav family arising between the 2 wives of Netaji and mobilization of rival Yadav armies for the next Yadava Mahabharat. (even a half-Yadav flop actor like Anna Hazare has been booked up by Amar Singh+BJP to play his part)

2. Indicators that Yoginder Yadava's's scripted & directed Swarajya India party is a CIA tainted production from the house of Bhushans; to the extent that even the new party's official contact address are their New York and Washington offices in USA (as exposedi in their official website which is themed in USA).

https://www.swarajindia.org/contactus.html

3. Since they will quickly delete the incriminating evidence even faster than #Kejriwal does, here is the pictorial evidence of it.

SWARAJ ABHIYAN (2009)







Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

Dear Munish

I am proud that India is the most secular country in the world. I believe that all of us should strive to keep it that way and allow each religion (and their adherents) to practice, profess and propagate their religion and conscience (subject to morality, health and public order)

So if anybody objects to polygamy or triple talaq, they should either amend the Constitution or establish that these practices are immoral or unhealthy or opposed to public order. In 66 years of the Republic, AFAIK nobody has been able to do so - because official census data (and as a paedri MD you must know this) shows that Indian Muslims have much lower child mortality rates than Hindus, have longer life-spans than Hindus and the sex-ratio for Muslims is far better than for Hindus.

I don't know which party you are with presently, ie. after AAP,  so I can't comment on "some other parties becoming dominant", but if you are implying that Muslims are changing the demographics through polygamy and triple-talaq the ground-reality is different.

NB : IAC is, and shall always be, "bold" :-)

Sarbajit
.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Dr. Munish Raizada <pedia333@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sarabjit ji:
Your several points are well taken regarding Hindutva and Akhand Hindustan vis a vis objectives of IAC. This is a bold statement. 
However, criticizing RSS will only create diversion. 
Also, opposing UCC at this juncture will harm the nation in long run. In decades, we have an opportunity to bring in UCC. It is unimaginable if some other parties become dominant.




Munish K Raizada, MD, FAAP
Board Certified Neonatologist
Chicago, USA
Phone: USA: +1- 217 720 9331 ; India: +91 98737- 03054
Skype: munish.raizada
Editor-in-Chief:  http://www.newsgram.com/

Follow me at:

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Dr. Elangbam

I thank you for your spirited email asking for UCC which I had forwarded to my seniors. Please see the bolded words below in context.

Since my movement is inclined to oppose UCC I am sharing some inputs for you.

1) My movement is historically (for over 200 years) and publicly in favour of propagation of "HINDUTVA" in India and the world.

2) My movement is historically (for over 200 years) and publicly in favour of Unified India, ie. AKHAND HINDUSTAN stretching from Burma to Afghanistan and from whole of Indian Ocean to Sri Lanka, Tibet and beyond Arunachal Pradesh as a living space for Hindus and Hindu cuture.

3) That we do not support the RSS (Rashtriya Swayam Sewak Sangh) who no doubt posture as defenders of Hinduism, but had sold out their movement to USA sometime in the late 1930s after Dr. Hedgewar's ill heath. The RSS does not at all represent Hindus today but only a tiny section of Hindus called "banias" who are corrupting the nation in name of Hindutva for their personal profit/ gain.

4) That my movement has studied foreign / alien religions for many centuries and know well their devilish ways and tricks to render Hindus impotent.

5) My movement especially views the UCC as a fiendish foreign device (trick) to convert India into a nation of sheep and make us into impotent "peaceniks" ever content to stay confined within some arbitrary drawn territorial borders no Hindu patriot would accept. Islam and Hinduism both had clearly understood why polygamy is an option to be retained in any martial society.

6) That silent majority of Hindus are as equally against UCC being imposed on them as Muslims are.

Sincerely

Sarbajit Roy


On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:11 PM, kameswar elangbam <dreksingh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,

We must support UCC and give reasons in absolute terms.
This country will go to dogs, ungovernable in future and the very existence will be at stake.
May we may antagonize a sizable section of the population, never mind,  even amongst them there are a great silent majority, who wish to express their mind and raise their voice but just because of the same fear of the fundamentalist, they are forced to be quite.
Let us rise above politics and all other issues for the sake of the nation; we should submit an unanimous view of approval to establish UCC.

Dr K S Elangbam

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Amitava Sanyal <saamit1@hotmail.com> wrote:
5. Not optional

6. Regulated



Sent from my Samsung device


-------- Original message --------
From: Dharmesh Dutta <duttadharmesh@gmail.com>
Date: 10-13-2016 12:11 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

5. No

6. Regulated

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To get a sense of the mood of our subscribers, we are seeking inputs on 2 queries which the Law Commission has posed

http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

5. Should the Uniform Civil Code be optional ?
a) Yes
b) No

6. Should the following practices be banned / regulated ?
a) Polygamy
b) Polyandry
c) Maitri-karar (friendship deed) and similar customary practices

Subscribers may post their views

Sarbajit


On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
If our members wish we can discuss the Law Commission's UCC questionnaire which is accessible here
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

Sarbajit



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Friday, October 21, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] Alarming pollution levels at R.K.Puram

2010/2016


I have been saying  it from the beginning that it was a political move of AAP to win browny points without any proper study

 Besides how can the judiciary become so active and involved without caring to know what is happening in other mega metropolitan cities. If you make a law make it for all Indian cities not just a tiny State just because it is the seat of power and the political,judicial power resides there. Now they are asking all adjoining states all kinds of information. Are those States not authorised to ask simimilar information about Delhi vehicular traffic visiting those States. CNG auto rikshaws by Judiciary was a sensible move. But today are the auto rikshaws running on meters. My experience is no. Besides it is much easier and economical to hire an ola air coditioned cab than a riksha or taxi. Let me give you an Example.   During a recent visit hiring a prepaid taxi  with no luggage from Airport to a locality in West Delhi by prepaid taxi rickety,no AC  cost me 325. On my way back Ola taxi same distance cost me Rs.180/ Is Kejriwal not aware what is happening in Delhi r is he protecting his vote bank or some vested interests through such hair b rained schemes ? 

S. Roy is fully aware of Delhi pollution and the causes. Panel only reinforces the same. Regds 




From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Prodipto Roy <prodipto.r@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 2:29 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Alarming pollution levels at R.K.Puram
 

Please remember that in the second round of odd-even someone set fire to the huge land fill mountain beyond Okhla. And villagers standardly burn biomass this season. By the time the second round started, commuters/commercial operators wisened up and bought odd-even no. New cars.

It was just an experiment, there's no need to condemn the person who instituted it but there IS a need to critically examine all the data(including such diverse things as international specs on different types of fuel and Indian fuels, diesel car models, prevailing wind patterns at that period, emissions from STPs, incinerators, generators, gases from covered drainage, wood burning by homeless people, pollution from incoming trucks, etc. )and their sources that is with the NGT and the CPCB, CSE, whoever. I.e., it needs an independent long-term scientific study without political agendas.

Joya Roy

On 19 Oct 2016 22:26, "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To
IAC-ians


We are pleased to report to our members that the Central Pollution Control Board has confirmed what IAC has been saying all along that Aam Aadmi Party's "Odd-Even" scheme did not cut pollution.

"Odd-even in Delhi had no impact, says Central Pollution Control Board"

Since yesterday the pollution in South Delhi was 7 times the prescribed limit, IAC has demanded that Secretary Environment GNCTD be charge-sheeted. Accordingly, the L-G has summoned the Secretary Environment today to LG House to explain these readings and CPCB findings.

It may be noted that the sensor data we are relying on is from  DPCC's most modern setup located at R.K.Puram using radio-active technology and is situated inside a Kendriya Vidyalaya school in midst of greenery and open spaces, so readings are much lower than actual levels faced in crowded streets and markets.

As a short term measure, IAC has demanded that igniting and bursting of firecrackers be banned during Diwali to drive home AAP sarkar's inability to control pollution in Delhi.

Sarbajit


On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Chief Minister of Delhi

Dear Chief Minister

Please find attached the PDF file (printed from DPCC air monitoring website) showing that 10 um SPM pollution levels at 700 are 7 times the permissible limits of 100. The readings are for 19th Oct 2016.

Since it is the Aam Aadmi Party govt which is responsible for this alarming situation, kindly immediately initiate disciplinary action against the Chairperson DPCC and Member Secretary DPCC for their gross corruption and failure to control the air pollution despite having the adequate real-time instrumentation which is recording these alarming pollution levels.

As a short term measure I strongly urge you to BAN the bursting and igniting of all firecrackers during this Diwali and prosecute offenders vigorously so that people of Delhi properly understand the pollution demon which is killing them.

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy
B/59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : +91-8010205897


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] STRICTLY PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL

For common ppl like us this group is an information portal as to the goings on in politics.
As Indians, we naturally put our politicians on a pedestal.
So a shakeup on this is disturbing we understand.
To be informed is better than ignorance.And upto us to decide.
Regards to all.


On 21 Oct 2016 10:48, "kameswar elangbam" <dreksingh@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sarbajit Roy,

I have been under under the impression that IAC is a non partisan, apolitical, powerful, courageous and highly patriotic group of Indians whose primary aim is nation state and country first without being hypocritical and double standard. I am extremely disappointed by the very fact of you and few others decided against UCC.
1) Let me ask you is there any country which practice laws against the constitution in the name of religious freedom.
2) Any law which permits gender discrimination.
3) Will the IAC experts suggest imposition of Sharia law for harshest punishment for rape, murder, thief, etc by instant justice to the accused by amputation, stoning, public hanging, public lashing etc to those whose freedom of religion is at stake.
4) Will you not comment about the anti national forces who enjoys the benefits of our country, eats shamelessly the taxpayers money, yet claims they are not Indians.
5) Should we not up stand against those forces which are feared by the majority and so the consequences of India today and allow to continue in perpetuity.

You need to be strong impartial and strife for removing these injustices prevailing for decades by the sheer stupidity of our past leaders and some present day vote bank politicians who may mortgage the country for power. If we consider ourselves unique speak out against past wrong doings regardless of being politically incorrect be so, in the larger interest of the country.

I am terribly disappointed I thought this is one such platform to do something for all countrymen irrespective of caste, religion and despite huge diversity.

Dr K S Elangbam


On 18 Oct 2016 22:43, "Swaraj Abhiyan" <theswarajabhiyan@gmail.com> wrote:
Here you are Pandeyji

http://archive.is/Jk5FD

SWARAJ ABHIYAN (2009)


On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Onkar <editoronkar@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Roy,

The Link of the Page you have mentioned in your Letter to Mr. kejriwal is not there. Perhaps it has been removed. 

"We have noted that you have not replied to our earlier email dt. Oct.9 2016 and also that the misogynist abuser Mr. Ashutosh continues as National Spoksperson for the Aam Aadmi party.  Now, since you have not denied the contents of Mr. Kapil Bajaj's piece (which we reported to you) alleging your own past liason/s and/or "bedroom farce" with Ms. Maliwal (@Shilpa), and since NEWSGRAM.COM (a news website in USA) has published some rather disturbing facts about Ms. Swati Maliwal and her keen interest in prostitution rackets in Delhi, the India Against Corruption ("IAC") is caused to publicly question you and/or your Government as follows:-"



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

Dear Sarabjit ji:
Your several points are well taken regarding Hindutva and Akhand Hindustan vis a vis objectives of IAC. This is a bold statement. 
However, criticizing RSS will only create diversion. 
Also, opposing UCC at this juncture will harm the nation in long run. In decades, we have an opportunity to bring in UCC. It is unimaginable if some other parties become dominant.




Munish K Raizada, MD, FAAP
Board Certified Neonatologist
Chicago, USA
Phone: USA: +1- 217 720 9331 ; India: +91 98737- 03054
Skype: munish.raizada
Editor-in-Chief:  http://www.newsgram.com/

Follow me at:

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Dr. Elangbam

I thank you for your spirited email asking for UCC which I had forwarded to my seniors. Please see the bolded words below in context.

Since my movement is inclined to oppose UCC I am sharing some inputs for you.

1) My movement is historically (for over 200 years) and publicly in favour of propagation of "HINDUTVA" in India and the world.

2) My movement is historically (for over 200 years) and publicly in favour of Unified India, ie. AKHAND HINDUSTAN stretching from Burma to Afghanistan and from whole of Indian Ocean to Sri Lanka, Tibet and beyond Arunachal Pradesh as a living space for Hindus and Hindu cuture.

3) That we do not support the RSS (Rashtriya Swayam Sewak Sangh) who no doubt posture as defenders of Hinduism, but had sold out their movement to USA sometime in the late 1930s after Dr. Hedgewar's ill heath. The RSS does not at all represent Hindus today but only a tiny section of Hindus called "banias" who are corrupting the nation in name of Hindutva for their personal profit/ gain.

4) That my movement has studied foreign / alien religions for many centuries and know well their devilish ways and tricks to render Hindus impotent.

5) My movement especially views the UCC as a fiendish foreign device (trick) to convert India into a nation of sheep and make us into impotent "peaceniks" ever content to stay confined within some arbitrary drawn territorial borders no Hindu patriot would accept. Islam and Hinduism both had clearly understood why polygamy is an option to be retained in any martial society.

6) That silent majority of Hindus are as equally against UCC being imposed on them as Muslims are.

Sincerely

Sarbajit Roy


On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:11 PM, kameswar elangbam <dreksingh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,

We must support UCC and give reasons in absolute terms.
This country will go to dogs, ungovernable in future and the very existence will be at stake.
May we may antagonize a sizable section of the population, never mind,  even amongst them there are a great silent majority, who wish to express their mind and raise their voice but just because of the same fear of the fundamentalist, they are forced to be quite.
Let us rise above politics and all other issues for the sake of the nation; we should submit an unanimous view of approval to establish UCC.

Dr K S Elangbam

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Amitava Sanyal <saamit1@hotmail.com> wrote:
5. Not optional

6. Regulated



Sent from my Samsung device


-------- Original message --------
From: Dharmesh Dutta <duttadharmesh@gmail.com>
Date: 10-13-2016 12:11 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

5. No

6. Regulated

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To get a sense of the mood of our subscribers, we are seeking inputs on 2 queries which the Law Commission has posed

http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

5. Should the Uniform Civil Code be optional ?
a) Yes
b) No

6. Should the following practices be banned / regulated ?
a) Polygamy
b) Polyandry
c) Maitri-karar (friendship deed) and similar customary practices

Subscribers may post their views

Sarbajit


On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
If our members wish we can discuss the Law Commission's UCC questionnaire which is accessible here
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

Sarbajit



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

Dear Dr Kameswar Elangbam

I am gladdened that you had recognised that IAC is a non partisan, apolitical, powerful, courageous and highly patriotic group of Indians whose primary aim is nation state and country first without being hypocritical and double standard

I am touched that a person of your eminence has set the ball rolling and decided to make the arguments for UCC and please rest assured this matter will be debated thoroughly and publicly before IAC makes its submission. IAC has not decided its stand on UCC

If you still have any doubts that IAC does not listen to voice of
members, you may kindly revisit IAC's last such debate on "homosexuality"
http://www.iacwiki.in/index.php?n=Main.Homosexuality

However, simply posing rhetorical questions will get us nowhere.

The facts are that the present Central Govt is going into assembly elections in states where there are significant vote blocks of minority community. It suits some persons to polarise the votes and prop up many small parties to further split the vote. Therefore those parties with strong vote banks and dedicated cadres derive an advantage and get "waves" despite getting only about 25% to 30% of the vote.

Nonetheless, I will briefly answer your questions:

Q1) Let me ask you is there any country which practice laws against the constitution in the name of religious freedom.

A) This is irrelevant because the Constitution of India recognises that there is unity in our dIversity and it is India's Strength (not weakness) that we allow multiple religions to flourish as the Fundamental Right of every Citizen to practice and propagate his/her own religion. This unique feature of India is what distinguishes us from our neighbours like Pakistan .

My counter-query, do you want to make India into Pakistan by a UCC ?

Q2)  Any law which permits gender discrimination.

A2) UCC is already there in our country for every citizen who wants to avail it. However, these UCC laws are highly gender discriminatory and discriminate against men. Most of these UCC laws have been drafted by so-called feminist lawyers whose NGOs are funded by foreign Christian missionary organisations. So it is not clear to IAC why you are proposing that such gender discriminatory laws are retained and imposed on secular Indians. The Indian Penal Code is touted as a UCC law, then why do you have the obnoxious section 498A and UCC laws like Domestic Violence Act ?

Q3) Will the IAC experts suggest imposition of Sharia law for harshest punishment for rape, murder, thief, etc by instant justice to the accused by amputation, stoning, public hanging, public lashing etc to those whose freedom of religion is at stake.

A3) Such queries betray gross ignorance of the underlying arguments. IAC neither asks for Sharia law nor Chanakya niti (which is equally reprehensible) to be universally imposed on Indian citizens. IAC has repeatedly denounced all sants, babas, swamis, priests, maulvis, qazis and other self-appointed repositories of religion and strongly suggested they be strung up from the nearest lamp-post. Furthermore, IAC says that no religious book is a source of authority - whether it be the Veds or the Gita or the Koran or the Bible or the Talmud etc..

Q4)  Will you not comment about the anti national forces who enjoys the benefits of our country, eats shamelessly the taxpayers money, yet claims they are not Indians.

A4) Since the question is directed to me personally, I shall reply in my capacity as an "Acharya" of a major Indian religion with about 10 million adherents. a) If there is any controversy about my religion over my nation, I shall choose my religion without hesitation as my forefathers did before me b) The real controversy is between those who worship man-made idols and those who refuse to worship man-made idols. So on one side we have Brahmins, Sikhs, Muslims, atheists, non-caste "Hindus" and indigenous tribals (63% of India's population) versus lower-caste Hindus (especially the RSS 'banias') and Christians.

This is not a new debate I am raising since it goes to the very heart of "who is a Hindu ?"

So my counter-query to you - Do you worship idols ?

Q5)  Should we not up stand against those forces which are feared by the majority and so the consequences of India today and allow to continue in perpetuity.

A5) Sir, if you are referring to perpetuation of so-called "Sanatam Dharam", my personal answer is NO. We should embrace the essential good from all religions and reject what is divisive and false. We believe that every human has the capacity to distinguish right from wrong and to act accordingly (ie. Dharma / Righteousness). We do not accept that the State can snatch this precious "righteousness" away from us and arrogate it to itself, through laws or otherwise. Should it reach that stage, the 63% will reject the Constitution of India and there will be civil war and anarchy.
 
Respectfully

Sarbajit Roy


On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:49 AM, kameswar elangbam <dreksingh@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sarbajit Roy,

I have been under under the impression that IAC is a non partisan, apolitical, powerful, courageous and highly patriotic group of Indians whose primary aim is nation state and country first without being hypocritical and double standard. I am extremely disappointed by the very fact of you and few others decided against UCC.
1) Let me ask you is there any country which practice laws against the constitution in the name of religious freedom.
2) Any law which permits gender discrimination.
3) Will the IAC experts suggest imposition of Sharia law for harshest punishment for rape, murder, thief, etc by instant justice to the accused by amputation, stoning, public hanging, public lashing etc to those whose freedom of religion is at stake.
4) Will you not comment about the anti national forces who enjoys the benefits of our country, eats shamelessly the taxpayers money, yet claims they are not Indians.
5) Should we not up stand against those forces which are feared by the majority and so the consequences of India today and allow to continue in perpetuity.

You need to be strong impartial and strife for removing these injustices prevailing for decades by the sheer stupidity of our past leaders and some present day vote bank politicians who may mortgage the country for power. If we consider ourselves unique speak out against past wrong doings regardless of being politically incorrect be so, in the larger interest of the country.

I am terribly disappointed I thought this is one such platform to do something for all countrymen irrespective of caste, religion and despite huge diversity.

Dr K S Elangbam




Re: [IAC#RG] STRICTLY PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL

Dear Sarbajit Roy,

I have been under under the impression that IAC is a non partisan, apolitical, powerful, courageous and highly patriotic group of Indians whose primary aim is nation state and country first without being hypocritical and double standard. I am extremely disappointed by the very fact of you and few others decided against UCC.
1) Let me ask you is there any country which practice laws against the constitution in the name of religious freedom.
2) Any law which permits gender discrimination.
3) Will the IAC experts suggest imposition of Sharia law for harshest punishment for rape, murder, thief, etc by instant justice to the accused by amputation, stoning, public hanging, public lashing etc to those whose freedom of religion is at stake.
4) Will you not comment about the anti national forces who enjoys the benefits of our country, eats shamelessly the taxpayers money, yet claims they are not Indians.
5) Should we not up stand against those forces which are feared by the majority and so the consequences of India today and allow to continue in perpetuity.

You need to be strong impartial and strife for removing these injustices prevailing for decades by the sheer stupidity of our past leaders and some present day vote bank politicians who may mortgage the country for power. If we consider ourselves unique speak out against past wrong doings regardless of being politically incorrect be so, in the larger interest of the country.

I am terribly disappointed I thought this is one such platform to do something for all countrymen irrespective of caste, religion and despite huge diversity.

Dr K S Elangbam


On 18 Oct 2016 22:43, "Swaraj Abhiyan" <theswarajabhiyan@gmail.com> wrote:
Here you are Pandeyji

http://archive.is/Jk5FD

SWARAJ ABHIYAN (2009)


On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Onkar <editoronkar@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Roy,

The Link of the Page you have mentioned in your Letter to Mr. kejriwal is not there. Perhaps it has been removed. 

"We have noted that you have not replied to our earlier email dt. Oct.9 2016 and also that the misogynist abuser Mr. Ashutosh continues as National Spoksperson for the Aam Aadmi party.  Now, since you have not denied the contents of Mr. Kapil Bajaj's piece (which we reported to you) alleging your own past liason/s and/or "bedroom farce" with Ms. Maliwal (@Shilpa), and since NEWSGRAM.COM (a news website in USA) has published some rather disturbing facts about Ms. Swati Maliwal and her keen interest in prostitution rackets in Delhi, the India Against Corruption ("IAC") is caused to publicly question you and/or your Government as follows:-"



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Alarming pollution levels at R.K.Puram

Well in this case I think the causes are very well known and you should not fall into the trap of using data and reports by self serving NGOs like CSE or TERI or corrupted ones like IIT which have been subverted by their compromises with their commercial sponsors.

For eg, Landfills in Delhi are ALWAYS on fire. They are ALWAYS on fire because of the illegal SLUMS of Delhi which are the votebanks for politicians. No existing party will dare to call for these slums to be bulldozed and the residents externed out of Delhi.

Action points

1) Ban all major construction work in Delhi. This is a major cause of dust and PM. DMRC is a major contributant and also blocks numerous important road stretches like Ring Road.

2) Ban Ola and Uber cabs. Ban all 2 wheelers and 3 wheelers.

3) Ban all pottery works in Delhi, these illegal units only start up after sunset and are notorious for burning PVC scrap like old electrical wires to recover copper/aluminium. for instance let us see if Kejriwal has the guts to stop the notoriously polluting "Kumhar Colony" in Uttam Nagar. But how can he ?

4) Prohibit DMRC from expelling / venting gases. This single step would probably reduce pollution by 10%

5) Seal all 5-star hotels and malls.

6) Prohibit use of air conditioners. This new trend of closely packed tall vertical glass structures requiring air-conditioning is responsible for at least 20% of the mess.

and so on.

Private car owners are not really responsible for the pollution mess, the problem is that AAP and Kejriwal are in the pockets of the polluters and are very well funded by them. Private car owners were thought to be a soft target, but the worm has turned.


On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Prodipto Roy <prodipto.r@gmail.com> wrote:

Please remember that in the second round of odd-even someone set fire to the huge land fill mountain beyond Okhla. And villagers standardly burn biomass this season. By the time the second round started, commuters/commercial operators wisened up and bought odd-even no. New cars.

It was just an experiment, there's no need to condemn the person who instituted it but there IS a need to critically examine all the data(including such diverse things as international specs on different types of fuel and Indian fuels, diesel car models, prevailing wind patterns at that period, emissions from STPs, incinerators, generators, gases from covered drainage, wood burning by homeless people, pollution from incoming trucks, etc. )and their sources that is with the NGT and the CPCB, CSE, whoever. I.e., it needs an independent long-term scientific study without political agendas.

Joya Roy

On 19 Oct 2016 22:26, "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To
IAC-ians


We are pleased to report to our members that the Central Pollution Control Board has confirmed what IAC has been saying all along that Aam Aadmi Party's "Odd-Even" scheme did not cut pollution.

"Odd-even in Delhi had no impact, says Central Pollution Control Board"

Since yesterday the pollution in South Delhi was 7 times the prescribed limit, IAC has demanded that Secretary Environment GNCTD be charge-sheeted. Accordingly, the L-G has summoned the Secretary Environment today to LG House to explain these readings and CPCB findings.

It may be noted that the sensor data we are relying on is from  DPCC's most modern setup located at R.K.Puram using radio-active technology and is situated inside a Kendriya Vidyalaya school in midst of greenery and open spaces, so readings are much lower than actual levels faced in crowded streets and markets.

As a short term measure, IAC has demanded that igniting and bursting of firecrackers be banned during Diwali to drive home AAP sarkar's inability to control pollution in Delhi.

Sarbajit


On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Chief Minister of Delhi

Dear Chief Minister

Please find attached the PDF file (printed from DPCC air monitoring website) showing that 10 um SPM pollution levels at 700 are 7 times the permissible limits of 100. The readings are for 19th Oct 2016.

Since it is the Aam Aadmi Party govt which is responsible for this alarming situation, kindly immediately initiate disciplinary action against the Chairperson DPCC and Member Secretary DPCC for their gross corruption and failure to control the air pollution despite having the adequate real-time instrumentation which is recording these alarming pollution levels.

As a short term measure I strongly urge you to BAN the bursting and igniting of all firecrackers during this Diwali and prosecute offenders vigorously so that people of Delhi properly understand the pollution demon which is killing them.

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy
B/59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : +91-8010205897


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] STRICTLY PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL

Dear Mr. Kapil Bajaj,

I confirm that we don't know each other or have met each other, but I do hope you recall the email with ID <CABOr3ZWxr7F+doP-98NS8=JRL=KM8SUKVsqFV-P10UboV70_bg@mail.gmail.com> you sent me on 8 Oct 2016 at 12:34 PM (Delivered after 1 seconds) containing, inter-alia, the following text regarding your piece titled "My Stint with Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and 'Social Activism'".

"Thanks. Do forward it to whoever you think might be interested.

And let people know that the name-changed person in the article is the current chair of DCW, as you might have guessed."

and thereafter

".. because quid pro quo relationship continues to pan out at the expense of public trust, norms that flow from public office and law, as well as public funds.

All AK's appointments are 'apna aadmi' appointments rather than 'aam aadmi' ones and the appointees are getting fat salaries and fringe benefits.

And the appointees themselves -- like the lady in question -- are making further 'apna aadmi' appointments.
This lady is now under ACB investigation for making more than 80 such appointments.

That's not all. The lady is acting as the hatchet woman on AK's behalf.."

and thereafter

"PS. By the way the pic attached has yours truly with the name-changed person. November 2008. Travelling from Coimbatore to Palakkad."

Since equally I have never met either Ms. Barkha Singh or Ms. Swati Maliwal or Ms."Shilpa", but I am deeply concerned about the allegations of nepotism you conveyed to me about "apna aadmi" appointments, I have every right as a citizen of India and voter of Delhi to directly enquire from the Chief Minister of Delhi as follows:-

a) Who the "present DCW chair" is ?

b) If there is/was any quid-pro-quo involved in Govt of Delhi's nomination of Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind as DCW chair, ie if at all Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind is indeed the present DCW chair ?.

c) On what basis Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind was nominated as DCW chair out of all the women in Delhi ?

Equally, It is open to the Chief Minister not to reply to me.

And finally Kapil, let me question you under the common law of India, existing since British times, since you have publicly alleged that your employer (then a married Govt servant) in 2008 indulged in liasons and bedroom farces (also known as "illicit connections" in family law) in State government guest house rooms with another employee (female), you must first explain how your purported employer came to employ both of you in the first place considering that he was a public servant at the time.

PS: If you read carefully, my usage of the term "sexual affair" was attributed to NEWSGRAM.COM's linked article and its headline "Who is Shilpa: Her Sexual affair with Arvind Kejriwal : Former journalist Colleague Kapil Bajaj raises question".

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy

> Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Kapil Bajaj <bajajk74@gmail.com> wrote:
To whoever is the recepient of Sarbajit Roy's mail.

Neither have I taken any names of women that Sarbajit Roy has used in
his email nor have I used words like "sexual affair" and "allegations"
in any email exchange with him.

I don't think I know Sarbajit Roy personally or have ever met him in my life.

Regards,
kapil bajaj



On 20/10/2016, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Chief Minister GNCTD
>
> Kind attn: Shri Rajeev Gupta, OSD to CM
>
> Dear Rajeev
>
> *ji*
> I had received an email from Shri Kapil Bajaj, a journalist who is well
> known to Shri Arvind Kejriwal*,* regarding the liasons" / "bedroom farce"
> Shri Arvind Kejriwal allegedly had in 2008 with "*the present chair of
> DCW*",
> and which Shri Bajaj claims to have personally witnessed, and which, as per
> Mr. Bajaj, culminated in "*apna aadmi*" appointment of the said person as
> .Chairperson of Delhi Womens Commission.
>
> Mr. Bajaj's allegations are also in the media, eg. NEWGRAM.COM run by a
> former Aam Aadmi Party volunteer Dr. Munish Raizada
>
> http://www.newsgram.com/who-is-shilpa-her-sexual-affair-with-arvind-kejriwal-former-journalist-colleague-kapil-bajaj-raises-question/
>
> Since Shri Bajaj has not named the individual in this alleged "*sexual
> affair*" with Mr. Kejriwal, but has only written to me (through his email)
> that it is the *present chair of DCW*, I am in a quandary considering that
> the statutory RTI disclosure of Delhi Govt mentions that Smt. Barkha Singh
> is Chairperson of DCW, the copy of which was emailed by me to CM Delhi's
> email ID earlier but no reply was received.
>
> In the meantime, a lady one Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind is claiming in public
> to be the Chairperson of Delhi Women's Commission and has leveled serious
> allegations by innuendo seemingly against Dr. Harsh Vardhan, Union Minister
> of Science and Technology, who is *inter-alia *the BJP's Member of
> Parliament for the constituency where GB Road brothels are situated.
>
> In these circumstances, I would be highly obliged if Delhi Govt locates and
> provides me by *close of work today* the gazette notifications or orders
> related to the appointment of present Chairperson and members of the Delhi
> Women's Commission. In the absence of such notification from GNCTD I shall
> presume that Smt. Barkha Singh is the present DCW chair and I shall be
> contacting her directly concerning Mr. Bajaj's allegations.
>
> Alternatively, Hon'ble Chief Minister may kindly direct whoever is the
> Chairperson of Delhi Women's Commission to publicly name the *"Union
> Minister and important Delhi-based leader of a national party*" who is
> allegedly the patron of the GB Road prostitution brothels as was alleged at
> a widely reported press conference held by Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind on or
> about 22.Sept.2016, again widely reported.
>
> http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/dcw-chief-swati-maliwal-sex-racket-gb-road-union-minister/
>
> I have reason to believe and am aggrieved that these allegations by
> innuendo directed seemingly at Dr. Harsh Vardhan are at the instance
> (so-called "credible lead") of one Shri Ashutosh Gupta, National
> spokesperson of Aam Aadmi Party, who lost to Shri Harsh Vardhan in the last
> Lok Sabha elections.and who bears a grudge against Dr. Harsh Vardhan. Mr.
> Ashutosh is the same lunatic person who publicly alleged that my deceased
> relative was in a sexual affair with Mr. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and I
> say that Mr. Ashtosh Gupta has no credibility whatsoever.
>
> sincerely
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Mr. Kapil Bajaj
>>
>> Thanks for your prompt reply.
>>
>> 1) The only other recipient of my email is Arvind Kejriwal <cmdelhi@...>,
>> I would therefore be obliged if my communication is not circulated.
>>
>> 2) I conveyed the "imputations" as I understood it. beginning with " ..
>> *recounts
>> an incident in Kejriwal's liaison with a young woman who now chairs a
>> statutory body of his government.*".
>>
>> 3) Since Arvind, and apparently everybody who has worked for him,
>> habitually believes in writing fiction and passing off fiction as fact
>> <see
>> annexure-1), I am highly aggrieved that Ashutosh chose to make scandalous
>> imputations concerning my relative and he was not immediately dismissed
>> from Arvind's party. It is no defence that Ashutosh, being a professional
>> journalist like you, slightly altered the name of the fermale through
>> years
>> of professional experience.
>>
>> 4) As per you, the "relationship" was "informal" and involved an episode
>> you witnessed "Behind closed door" and described *inter-alia* in the
>> following language "*It was an extraordinary sight. .. The Ramon
>> Magsaysay award winning 'social activist,' whom I had witnessed being
>> feted
>> in Kochi the other day for promoting transparency, was engaged in some
>> kind
>> of secret bedroom farce with his own young colleague. *"
>>
>> 5) Arvind Kejriwal is a public figure who voluntarily joined politics and
>> fought elections. If the result of those elections permits him to appoint
>> meritless people only because they are "related" to him, then I (as a
>> citizen of India and elector of Delhi) have every right to question him
>> directly, and I shall do so. Arvind is equally free to choose not to
>> reply
>> and I look forward to seeing which officer his efficient OSD will forward
>> my email/s to this time.
>>
>> sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy
>> Mob : +91-8010205897
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Kapil Bajaj <bajajk74@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Whoever is the recipient of Sarbajit Roy's mail,
>>>
>>> 1. My article, 'My Stint with Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and
>>> 'Social Activism,' does not use the phrases "sexual relationship,"
>>> "at night," or name "Swati Maliwal," nor did I use these phrases and
>>> the name in any interaction with Sarbjit Roy.
>>>
>>> 2. I never told Sarbjit Roy that I am "saddened by the way politics
>>> seems to have affected you".
>>>
>>> 3. I never "asked" Sarbjit Roy to contact "you" directly concerning my
>>> "piece".
>>>
>>> kapil
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/10/2016, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > *To*:
>>> > Shri Arvind Kejriwal
>>> > Chief Minister of Delhi
>>> >
>>> > *PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL*
>>> >
>>> > Dear Arvind
>>> >
>>> > I am receiving reports from various places that one of your close
>>> > associates in PCRF has very recently imputed in public domain that you
>>> are
>>> > / were in a sexual relationship with Swati Maliwal. Incidentally Swati
>>> > Maliwal is now the Chairperson of the Delhi Commission for Women after
>>> you
>>> > recommended her for the post and you publicly denied she was related
>>> > to
>>> > you.
>>> >
>>> > Accordingly, I have contacted the author of the piece (*My Stint with
>>> > Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and 'Social Activism'*), and he
>>> > reiterates his allegations that in November 2008 he observed you in a
>>> close
>>> > position and sharing a bed with Ms. Maliwal behind locked doors in a
>>> guest
>>> > house at night, despite that.all of you had separate rooms. The author
>>> has
>>> > also written in the same piece that he observed you giving Ms. Maliwal
>>> > large denomination notes (currency) when she requested it.
>>> >
>>> > I am sure that you would be aware of what I am alluding to, however, I
>>> can
>>> > supply a copy of the piece if you need it.
>>> >
>>> > I would hope/expect that you swiftly rebut / nip these claims made by
>>> your
>>> > associate. To me at least, and you know that I am highly sceptical of
>>> > people who make such allegations with thin or no evidence, there
>>> appears to
>>> > be some prima-facie veracity in the detailed circumstances and motives
>>> > narrated by this 'public spirited' author who, like me, is saddened by
>>> the
>>> > way politics seems to have affected you.
>>> >
>>> > *NB*: I am highly offended that Ashutosh contines as National
>>> Spokesperson
>>> > for your party after he publicly insulted my ancestor Ms. Sarlaa
>>> > (Debi)
>>> > Chaudhurani by baselessly alleging she was in a sexual relationship
>>> > with
>>> > Gandhi. I am again requesting you to throw him out.
>>> >
>>> > I look forward to some action with 48-72 hours, ie. till Dusshera.
>>> >
>>> > *PS*: I am bcc'ing a copy of this email to the author of the piece,
>>> since
>>> > he has asked me to contact you directly concerning his piece.
>>> >
>>> > sincerely / warmly,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Sarbajit Roy
>>> > B-59 Defence Colony
>>> > New Delhi 110024
>>> > Mob: +91-8010205897
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://kbforyou.blogspot.in/
>>>
>>
>>
>


--
http://kbforyou.blogspot.in/

Re: [IAC#RG] PM MODI /MODI & MODI

Yesterday discussion on sum hospital is totally wrong. Sum hospital is substitute for government hospital not any corporate hospitals like aditya care,appllo etc

Plz don't comment any unnecessary things this hospital is lifeline for poor sections of odisha

And another thing just 2 months before fire broke out Cuttack govt scb hospital but chief minister was not arrested neither chief medical officer

We should favor somebody's effort he is not like mallya or any black corporate person

Regards


On Oct 20, 2016 1:29 PM, "R. Dua" <r.dua1234@gmail.com> wrote:

Security cover to Sh Arnab ji is a necessity.
Don't know about any other reason but the way he questions Pakistan generals and takes the questions right to the culprit's throat..
Yesterday on News Hour he insisted on knowing whereabouts of SUM hospital owner, some Nayar who runs Medical Colleges, Engg institutes and wat not in Orrisa.
These country straps have BIG money involved and can go to any length to silence ppl.
No other news channel does this so good and corners the culprit.
Hence security cover can be put to higher cat too..Well Worth.
With Regards to all.


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in