Friday, March 2, 2012

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.

Sarabjit sir, could you please write down the operative part of the SC judgement for us to know how the SC allows the  CIC/ICs to do whatever they want to do can do. thanks. beniwal

--- On Sat, 3/3/12, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.
To: "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
Date: Saturday, 3 March, 2012, 7:26 AM

Dear Sandeep

When IC(SS) ... and all other ICs .. have a SC judgment allowing them
to do what they are doing, what purpose will it solve to file a
Petition to the President of India ?

Sarbajit


On Mar 3, 4:49 am, Sandeep gupta <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wish to inform as to how pendency is cleared by SS. She has not
> heard any complaint case. she asks all complainants to first use
> option of first appeal. if there is disattisfaction with order of FAA
> file fresh second appeal.
> in some cases, there is no response from FAA and the appellant
> approaches CIC, then she asks the FAA to give decision. appellant is
> asked to approach commission again after decision of FAA.
> by this blatant violation of provisions of RTI act, these so called
> highly talented ICs clear the pendency of the cases.
> I am contemplating filing a petition to president of india to seek
> removal of such commissioners.
> please give your feedback/comments
>
> On 3/2/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Dear Nidhi (and group)
>
> > After my email post to the HJ list specifying that IC(AD) was #2
> > defaulter,  the CIC has been stung into action. IC(AD)'s registry has
> > published their pending cases on CIC's website. She claims to have
> > only 220 Appeals and 150 Complaints pending (ie. about half of what
> > .IC(SG)'s outstanding is).
>
> > So it is quite obvious that of the known pendency of the CIC (and
> > which we must assume to be true), IC-SG is the worst offender in terms
> > of pendency at around 850 cases, and even assuming that teh remaining
> > 5 ICs had an average of 400 cases each (avg. of CIC + AD) then this
> > works out to 2,000 cases which is almost exactly equal to the info
> > given to me of "around 2,700" pending cases only.
>
> > Satyanand's Mishra's own figures damn him. WHY THEN DO WE NEED THESE 3
> > EXTRA ICs ? Is it because of all those paid holidays they now get for
> > study tours / junkets to New Zealand and Scandanavia where a certain
> > MNC financed NGO is hosting them. ??
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > On 2/27/12, Nidhi Sharma <nidhi2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Dear Sarbajit
>
> >> I met Mr Satyanand Mishra last week. He stands by the 20,000+ figure. He
> >> says that is the real pendency with CIC. He has now asked all registries
> >> (ICs) to manually count every case pending with them and file a return by
> >> the end of this week so that he can actually react to the media reports.
>
> >> nidhi
>
> --
> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
> 1778, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA
> Phone: 91-99929-31181

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.