Friday, March 2, 2012

Re: [HumJanenge] No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.

Dear Nidhi (and group)

After my email post to the HJ list specifying that IC(AD) was #2
defaulter, the CIC has been stung into action. IC(AD)'s registry has
published their pending cases on CIC's website. She claims to have
only 220 Appeals and 150 Complaints pending (ie. about half of what
.IC(SG)'s outstanding is).

So it is quite obvious that of the known pendency of the CIC (and
which we must assume to be true), IC-SG is the worst offender in terms
of pendency at around 850 cases, and even assuming that teh remaining
5 ICs had an average of 400 cases each (avg. of CIC + AD) then this
works out to 2,000 cases which is almost exactly equal to the info
given to me of "around 2,700" pending cases only.

Satyanand's Mishra's own figures damn him. WHY THEN DO WE NEED THESE 3
EXTRA ICs ? Is it because of all those paid holidays they now get for
study tours / junkets to New Zealand and Scandanavia where a certain
MNC financed NGO is hosting them. ??

Sarbajit

Sarbajit


On 2/27/12, Nidhi Sharma <nidhi2479@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sarbajit
>
> I met Mr Satyanand Mishra last week. He stands by the 20,000+ figure. He
> says that is the real pendency with CIC. He has now asked all registries
> (ICs) to manually count every case pending with them and file a return by
> the end of this week so that he can actually react to the media reports.
>
> nidhi
>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.