Re:: [HumJanenge] RTI First Appeal u/s 19 of RTI Act

On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:22 IST Sarbajit Roy wrote:

>To:
>The Appellate Authority, PMO
>
>Date: 09.Nov.2011
>
>Sir:
>
>Sub: First Appeal against RTI reply no. RTI/3832/2011-PMR dated 19.Oct.2011.
>
>Kindly decide my appeal against the above mentioned RTI reply issued by
>Sanjukta Ray made on the following distinct grounds set out below without
>prejudice to each other.
>
>1) FOR the Ld. CPIO has failed to issue me a "third party" notice u/s 11 of
>RTI Act, for which he/she deserves to be penalised for providing the
>information to the aplicant without due notice to me.
>
>2) FOR the Ld. CPIO has corruptly provided 1 page of information free of
>charge to the applicant (a habitual RTI misuser) and thereby deprived the
>State of prescribed revenue and for which the CPIO deserves to penalised.
>
>3) FOR the Ld. CPIO has failed to initate prosecution under the Official
>Secrets Act against the applicant for publishing information obtained under
>RTI process over the media and internet and thereby disclosing state
>secrets to foreigners and other persons inimincal to the Indian State, and
>for which the CPIO deserves to be prosecuted.
>
>Prayer:
>
>A) That suitable directions be issued on my Appeal after hearing me in
>person on adeqaute notice to attend.
>
>And for which kindness the appellant shall be ever grateful as duty bound.
>
>Er. Sarbajit Roy
>(Appellant)
>
>Address: B-59 Defence Colony, New Delhi 110024.
>Tel: 011-24334262
LOL, you are putting wool over peoples eyes. Maybe the FAA of PMO will be able to see through the appeal, but the same cannot be said of this list members, haramis included.

:-)

Manoj