Hum Janenge

Monday, January 16, 2017

Re: [IAC#RG] Impleadment in matter of Shri Ashutosh Gupta's outrageous blog on NDTV.com

17/1/16

Swati Maliwal did not name the minister.

Never heard of brothels in Chandni Chowk. GB road is the known area for brothels and way beyond Chandni Chowk.

There is another Uninion Minister from this area as well. So Dr. Harsh Vardhan name could be a conjucture.

The matter is still worth pursuing-either to prove Maliwal is malicious in making the allegation or to expose the concerned minister. The racket is certainly thriving through police/political protection either at State or Centre level.

Regds

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 11:09 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Impleadment in matter of Shri Ashutosh Gupta's outrageous blog on NDTV.com

Lalita K claims to now not even be a primary member of BJP after being
nominated as Chairperson NCW. The latest simlar show cause / summons
NCW issued is to the Congress Home Minister in Karnataka over the
Bangalore gropings.

It is for Arvind Kejriwal and his party to disclose their evidence
against Dr. Harsh Vardhan considering that it was Swati Maliwal who
stated at her press conference that a Union Minister and prominent
Delhi politician (making Harsh Vardhan the only suspect) is the patron
of these GB Road brothels. Of course it is very convenient that AAP's
Ashutosh lost out to Dr. Harsh Vardhan from Chandni Chowk where these
brothels are situated.

On 1/16/17, Prodipto Roy <prodipto.r@gmail.com> wrote:
> All appointments of heads of important institutions are made on political
> considerations not on the basis of competence or merit. Lalitha K. is a
> member of BJP's National Executive so would never expose wrongdoing by her
> party members.
>
> What is the source of your evidence on Harsh V's GB Road connections?
>
> J. Roy

[IAC#RG] Our extremely informative newsterment Tv channels

Till about two months ago I had a subscription to about 8 Tv news channels, excluding BBC & CNN. The reason for subscribing to so many "news" channels was the great frequency and duration of advertisements that interrupted / diluted the news experience. Hence, I needed many channels to surf out of the advertisements. (Just for information, out of the 8 odd news channels, typically about 5 would be broadcasting advertisements ..... which would imply that advertisements accounted for maybe 60% of airtime, and news less than half the airtime.) The other reason was that I was fed up with the shrill and highly opinionated / deeply biased, often dishonest and immature views of several of the anchors. And finally, the "debates" got me.

Then accidentally, I stumbled upon the government run LS and RS Tv news channels. My first thought was that they would be even more biased and useless than the private channels. However, these channels turned out to be outstanding: the anchors are well versed in the subject matter, they are sober without being boring, they conduct discussions rather than noisy "debates", the advertisement breaks are reasonable, and they have a wide repertoire. In short , I was happy to get rid of 4 of the private "news channels", and I am very happy with my decision.

Learned members may wish to try for themselves.

Regards

Sunday, January 15, 2017

Re: [IAC#RG] Impleadment in matter of Shri Ashutosh Gupta's outrageous blog on NDTV.com

Re: [IAC#RG] DEFIANCE OF JUDICIARY WILL LEAD TO ANARCHY

Dear Mr Venkatraman

While your concerns are genuine the fact remains that our judiciary is the real threat to rule of law in this country. Apart from the reasons listed by Sarbajit Roy, here are some more:

1. From the first principle of jurisprudence, that justice delayed is justice denied, our judiciary is an obvious and abysmal failure.

2. Worse, even after preposterous delays, our judiciary cannot be seen delivering justice in the manner 'justice should not only be done but seen to be done'. In fact I can list many cases where the judiciary has pronounced preposterous judgements and even fooled the masses. To take two recent judgements, you may recollect the apex court orders on the national judicial appointments commission and its claim of the law being against the constitutional principle of judicial independence. Anyone familiar with how the collegium system was imposed on us should know that this judgement and the presumption on which it is based are frauds of the highest order. There is a more recent one on compensating the victims of endosulphan in kasargode, kerala. The judgement says that the money has to be recovered from the pesticide companies and the state govt may also approach the centre! Those who know the facts cannot but call it another fraud decision. Here are the facts: one, the pesticide cos are not responsible as the pesticide had not been banned then; two, the culprits are the officials of the Plantation Corporation of India who irresponsibly sprayed the pesticide over their plantations using aircraft; and thirdly, there has been no action taken against the guilty officials nor has the apex court directed any such action!

3. In fact the preposterous delays of our judiciary has led to even the executive to perpetrate crimes on the citizens with impunity by driving citizens to the courts and making them wait for generations for a verdict!

4. After coming to the conclusion that all three organs of the constitution have let down the citizens most unabashedly, horribly, preposterously and with impunity I just applied firs principles to analyse which is the worst organ and here is my finding:

Amoung the three organs of our Constitution the law-makers are controlled by the people, bureaucracy (yes, bureaucracy, because without the active support of the bureaucracy no politician can do any wrong!) and finally the judiciary; the law-enforcers are also controlled by the law-makers and the judiciary. And then there are the ears and eyes of the people- the media waiting to sensationalise every news involving the misdemeanour of these authorities. Inspite of such strict supervision and control all that we can hear these days are about politician-bureaucrat-underworld nexus even though the fact remains that none, worth the name, from this unholy nexus have ever been punished by the holier-than-thou judiciary.

So now think how bad a system can be which is not only NOT subject to supervision but also kept beyond critical observation. Well isn't our judiciary is just that? And do I need to recapitulate that quip: power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely?

regards n bw

ravi

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:

To

India Against Corruption

DEFIANCE OF JUDICIARY WILL LEAD TO ANARCHY

Supreme court ordered Karnataka government to release certain quantity of Cauvery water to Tamil Nadu, which was defied by Karnataka government. Supreme court has earlier ordered that Jallikattu should not be conducted in Tamil Nadu and the case to review the order is still pending. However, in several places in Tamil Nadu , Jallikattu has been conducted defying the supreme Court order.

There have also been similar other instances of defiance of supreme Court order in the past in variety of ways.

Possibly, the main reason for such defiance of judiciary is that it does not anymore command the type of respect that it did earlier.

With supreme court judges refusing to have transparency in the appointment of judges , quite a number of judges having been caught on corruption charges or accused of being corrupt, some former judges like Katju questioning the Supreme Court orders, some of the controversial observations of the judges inside and outside the court premises, some judges sharing platform with those facing corruption and criminal charges , judiciary seems to be rapidly losing it's pivotal position and lofty image that it once enjoyed.

In such circumstances, perspective seem to be developing among section of people that the order of judiciary need not be considered sacroscent and can be defied if mass protest can be organized against the order.

So far, those who defy the court orders by threatening to disrupt law and order have got away and courts give an appearance of being helpless in tackling such defiance.

This is a very unhealthy situation and can lead to anarchy.

With the credibility of the politicians and bureaucrats being so low, people seem to think that in the present conditions, judiciary should rise up to the occasion and punish the culprits and ensure fair play. It is increasingly becoming doubtful whether judiciary is now cut out to play such role of remaining as a watch dog and conscience keeper of society.

In any case, even if some damage has been done to the reputation of judiciary in recent times, the judiciary's verdict should be accepted unquestioningly by everyone to prevent a scenario of free for all.

N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice For The Deprived
nandinivoice.com

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Veteran Major P M Ravindran

http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com

Re: [IAC#RG] Impleadment in matter of Shri Ashutosh Gupta's outrageous blog on NDTV.com

All appointments of heads of important institutions are made on political considerations not on the basis of competence or merit. Lalitha K. is a member of BJP's National Executive so would never expose wrongdoing by her party members.

What is the source of your evidence on Harsh V's GB Road connections?

J. Roy

On 15 Jan 2017 22:18, "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To:
Ms. Lalita Kumaramangalam
Hon'ble Chairperson
National Commission for Women

cc: Chief Minister of Delhi.

BY EMAIL

Dear Ms. Kumaramangalam,

Sub: Case / File no : 8/C160014050/2016/NCW/RS/NEE

Kindly refer to my appended email of 9.Oct.2016.

I am constrained to observe that it is well over 4 months now since the last hearing in the subject complaint and yet there is no order of the Hon'ble Commission in this matter for a complaint / counter-complaint alleging inter-alia sexual harassment by the present Prime Minister of India and the present President of the BJP Mr. Amit Shah made by Shri Ashutosh of Aam Aadmi Party.

To refresh your memory of this matter, (I am not giving the exact dates since these are on your file/s) you had summoned Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, National Spokesperson of Aam Aadmi Party, under NCW's statutory powers and which you announced on national television (Times Now) was based on my complaint against Ashutosh's outrageous and misogynistic article published by the "prestigious" news portal NDTV.COM.

Accordingly, Mr. Ashutosh Gupta dutifully appeared before you, refsued to answer queries about his writings and and instead counter-complained about sexual harassments allegedly committed by Shri Narendra Modi and Shri Amit Shah, which allegations he tendered in writing along with certain electronic evidences.

Very shortly thereafter this hearing Shri Ashutosh gave a public statement outside NCW's office to the media saying that you had personally assured him that you would conduct an independent and fair inquiry into his complaint and would also summon Mr. Modi in the same way Ashutosh was summoned. A video of this statement broadcast live by NEWSX is at URL

Ashutosh rakes up harassement charges on PM Narendra Modi, cites snooping charges on Amit Shah

Thereupon another NEWX reporter interviewed you on Mr.Ashutosh's statement in your office. I was also present during this interview and I have have my recording where you confirmed that Mr. Ashutosh's "complaint" against Mr. Modi / Mr. Shah would also be registered and sent to the NCW's Complaint and Investigation unit. A video of your statement broadcast live by NEWSX is at URL

NCW vs Ashutosh: NCW chief Lalitha Kumaramangalam speaks to NewsX exclusively

Thereafter when no order on my complaint was forthcoming, I sent you my reminder dt. 9.Oct.2016 and followed it up with an RTI request dated 25.Oct.2016 since I believed Mr. Ashutosh had committed criminal Contempt of the Supreme Court in your chambers. You had with great foresight officially videographed the proceedings. My RTI request is registered as no. MOWCD/R/2016/50635 dated 25.Oct.2016 and forwarded to your Commission by Shri V.S. Yadav (CPIO/MoWCD) very promptly. It is still not replied to.

In these circumstances wherein Institutions like the NCW and the DCW (Delhi Womens Commission) seem to be highly politicised paper tigers in the sense that NCW seemingly targets non-BJP politicians and the DCW Chairperson gets away with publicly imputing that one Dr. Harsh Vardhan (a BJP Union Minister) is running brothels on Delhi's GB Road, the complainants before you are fd up and constrained to give you final and clear warning to pass orders forthwith and dispose of the pending complaints against/by Mr. Ashutosh Gupta of Aam Aadmi Party.

In the alternative, I and the the INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION jan andolan (to whom this email is being circulated) shall presume that no contempt has been committed by Mr. Ashutosh and that his allegations (NCW had summoned him in his capacity as Spokesperson Aam Aadmi Party) against Mr. Narendra Modi and Mr. Amit Shah in the "Snoopgate scandal" have been ascertained by NCW as being true and correct.

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION, jan andolan
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

Tel :+ 91-8010205897

On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Ms. Lalita Kumaramangalam
Hon'ble Chairperson
National Commission for Women

Dear Ms. Kumaramangalam,

Sub: Case / File no : 8/C160014050/2016/NCW/RS/NEE

I am constrained to observe that it is well over a month now since the last hearing in the subject complaint and yet there is no order of the Hon'ble Commission.

Since, I am given to understand that Mr Ashutosh had apparently submitted / deposed on 08.Sept.2016 that Mr.Modi and Mr. Amit Shah are as equally culpable of derogatory offences against women as he is, I am of the view that your Hon'ble Commission should pass an order in Mr. Ashutosh's matter as expeditiously as possible.

sincerely

Er. Sarbajit Roy
COMPLAINANT
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : +91-8010205897

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Hon'ble Chairperson
National Commission for Women

BY EMAIL

Dear Madam Chairperson,

1) I would be obliged if you would kindly also include / implead me in the subject matter as a complainant against Shri Ashutosh Gupta (alias Ashutosh). I also pray that M/s NDTV.com be impleaded as an offender.

2) My grievance is that Ashutosh and NDTV.com has published offensive, inaccurate, misleading, abusive, pedophilic, hateful, ethically objectionable, disparaging, or otherwise inappropriate material in the article accessible at
"http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/the-sex-was-consensual-private-act-why-aap-punished-its-man-1453374"
where Ashutosh has written inter-alia

"Indian history is full of examples of our leaders and heroes who had lived with their desires beyond social boundaries. Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru's reported affairs with many female colleagues were juicy gossip but it didn't spoil his political career. His relationship with Edwina Mountbatten is widely discussed. The entire world knew about it. Their affections continued till Pt. Nehru's last breath. Was it a sin? History is also witness to the fact that top leaders of the Congress in 1910s were worried about Gandhiji's relationship with Sarla Chaudhary, who was distantly related to Rabindra Nath Tagore. Gandhi Ji had confessed that Sarla was his spiritual wife. Kasturba Gandhi was very disturbed. C Rajagopalchari and other senior leaders of the party had to intervene. They persuaded, pressured, cajoled Gandhi-ji to leave Sarla. Gandhiji in his later days slept naked with his two nieces to experiment with celibacy. Pandit Nehru had told him not to do so as the country would rise against him but Gandhi-ji did not budge."

3) That although there was no such person as "Sarla Chaudhary" as described (which is probably a patently deliberate device devised by Ashutosh to claim she is a fictional character) it is obvious he is alluding to my deceased great-grand-aunt Sarala Debi Chaudhurani (who unfortunately has left behind no direct descendants to counter Ashutosh's calumny) using the despicable device of innuendo employed by gutter columnists.

4) I and my family are upset that NDTV.com website has published Ashutosh's distortions linking Mohandas Gandhi's sexual (masturbatory) fantasies to my deceased family members names to besmirch their iconic places in history. It is relevant to mention that Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani is the pre-eminent feminist icon of India, prominent in nationalist and Congress circles and had written the musical score for both India's National Antem (ie. Jana Gana Mana) as well as the National song (ie. Bande Mataram). In fact these nation binding anthems were greatly popularised in Upper India by Smt. Sarala Debi of the highly nationalistic Adi Brahmo Samaj (a religious minority) of which I am an 'acharya' and an attack on Smt. Sarala Debi or Gurudev Rabindra Nath Tagore simply to defend a misogynistic sex-crazed rapist Minister is also an attack on our minority religion.

5) For your Eminence's information, Gandhi was never in India in 1910 (or even 1911, 1912, 1913....) whereas Pulitzer-Prize winning reporter Joseph Lelyveld writes that Gandhi was then (ie. since 1908) in a homo-erotic relationship with Hermann Kaltenbach in South Africa. Please see the ABC TC (US) url
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/gandhi-book-claims-indian-leader-bisexual-racist/story?id=13255847

Accordingly, I say that if at all the Congress Party or Ms. Kasturba Gandhi ('Ba') was very disturbed with Mr. Gandhi in 1910s, it was because of Mr. Gandhi's homo-erotic activities and homosexual / pedophilic proclivities rather than any alleged relationship (sexual or otherwise) with Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani.

6) Accordingly, I sincerely hope that Hon'ble Commission impleads me as a complainant and strongly indicts Shri Ashutosh Gupta and NDTV.com. I also seek permission to submit my evidence during proceedings as and when directed by your honor.

PS : I am a non-political person and am filing this in my personal capacity as a relative of Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani (deceased) to defend her honour.

Sincerely,

Sarbajit Roy

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

Tel : 8010205897

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Impleadment in matter of Shri Ashutosh Gupta's outrageous blog on NDTV.com

To:

Ms. Lalita Kumaramangalam

Hon'ble Chairperson

National Commission for Women

cc: Chief Minister of Delhi.

BY EMAIL

Dear Ms. Kumaramangalam,

Sub: Case / File no : 8/C160014050/2016/NCW/RS/NEE

Kindly refer to my appended email of 9.Oct.2016.

I am constrained to observe that it is well over 4 months now since the last hearing in the subject complaint and yet there is no order of the Hon'ble Commission in this matter for a complaint / counter-complaint alleging inter-alia sexual harassment by the present Prime Minister of India and the present President of the BJP Mr. Amit Shah made by Shri Ashutosh of Aam Aadmi Party.

To refresh your memory of this matter, (I am not giving the exact dates since these are on your file/s) you had summoned Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, National Spokesperson of Aam Aadmi Party, under NCW's statutory powers and which you announced on national television (Times Now) was based on my complaint against Ashutosh's outrageous and misogynistic article published by the "prestigious" news portal NDTV.COM.

Accordingly, Mr. Ashutosh Gupta dutifully appeared before you, refsued to answer queries about his writings and and instead counter-complained about sexual harassments allegedly committed by Shri Narendra Modi and Shri Amit Shah, which allegations he tendered in writing along with certain electronic evidences.

Very shortly thereafter this hearing Shri Ashutosh gave a public statement outside NCW's office to the media saying that you had personally assured him that you would conduct an independent and fair inquiry into his complaint and would also summon Mr. Modi in the same way Ashutosh was summoned. A video of this statement broadcast live by NEWSX is at URL

Ashutosh rakes up harassement charges on PM Narendra Modi, cites snooping charges on Amit Shah

Thereupon another NEWX reporter interviewed you on Mr.Ashutosh's statement in your office. I was also present during this interview and I have have my recording where you confirmed that Mr. Ashutosh's "complaint" against Mr. Modi / Mr. Shah would also be registered and sent to the NCW's Complaint and Investigation unit. A video of your statement broadcast live by NEWSX is at URL

NCW vs Ashutosh: NCW chief Lalitha Kumaramangalam speaks to NewsX exclusively

Thereafter when no order on my complaint was forthcoming, I sent you my reminder dt. 9.Oct.2016 and followed it up with an RTI request dated 25.Oct.2016 since I believed Mr. Ashutosh had committed criminal Contempt of the Supreme Court in your chambers. You had with great foresight officially videographed the proceedings. My RTI request is registered as no. MOWCD/R/2016/50635 dated 25.Oct.2016 and forwarded to your Commission by Shri V.S. Yadav (CPIO/MoWCD) very promptly. It is still not replied to.

In these circumstances wherein Institutions like the NCW and the DCW (Delhi Womens Commission) seem to be highly politicised paper tigers in the sense that NCW seemingly targets non-BJP politicians and the DCW Chairperson gets away with publicly imputing that one Dr. Harsh Vardhan (a BJP Union Minister) is running brothels on Delhi's GB Road, the complainants before you are fd up and constrained to give you final and clear warning to pass orders forthwith and dispose of the pending complaints against/by Mr. Ashutosh Gupta of Aam Aadmi Party.

In the alternative, I and the the INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION jan andolan (to whom this email is being circulated) shall presume that no contempt has been committed by Mr. Ashutosh and that his allegations (NCW had summoned him in his capacity as Spokesperson Aam Aadmi Party) against Mr. Narendra Modi and Mr. Amit Shah in the "Snoopgate scandal" have been ascertained by NCW as being true and correct.

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor

INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony

New Delhi 110024

Tel :+ 91-8010205897

On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To:
Ms. Lalita Kumaramangalam
Hon'ble Chairperson
National Commission for Women

Dear Ms. Kumaramangalam,

Sub: Case / File no : 8/C160014050/2016/NCW/RS/NEE

I am constrained to observe that it is well over a month now since the last hearing in the subject complaint and yet there is no order of the Hon'ble Commission.

Since, I am given to understand that Mr Ashutosh had apparently submitted / deposed on 08.Sept.2016 that Mr.Modi and Mr. Amit Shah are as equally culpable of derogatory offences against women as he is, I am of the view that your Hon'ble Commission should pass an order in Mr. Ashutosh's matter as expeditiously as possible.

sincerely

Er. Sarbajit Roy
COMPLAINANT
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : +91-8010205897

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Hon'ble Chairperson
National Commission for Women

BY EMAIL

Dear Madam Chairperson,

1) I would be obliged if you would kindly also include / implead me in the subject matter as a complainant against Shri Ashutosh Gupta (alias Ashutosh). I also pray that M/s NDTV.com be impleaded as an offender.

2) My grievance is that Ashutosh and NDTV.com has published offensive, inaccurate, misleading, abusive, pedophilic, hateful, ethically objectionable, disparaging, or otherwise inappropriate material in the article accessible at
"http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/the-sex-was-consensual-private-act-why-aap-punished-its-man-1453374"
where Ashutosh has written inter-alia

"Indian history is full of examples of our leaders and heroes who had lived with their desires beyond social boundaries. Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru's reported affairs with many female colleagues were juicy gossip but it didn't spoil his political career. His relationship with Edwina Mountbatten is widely discussed. The entire world knew about it. Their affections continued till Pt. Nehru's last breath. Was it a sin? History is also witness to the fact that top leaders of the Congress in 1910s were worried about Gandhiji's relationship with Sarla Chaudhary, who was distantly related to Rabindra Nath Tagore. Gandhi Ji had confessed that Sarla was his spiritual wife. Kasturba Gandhi was very disturbed. C Rajagopalchari and other senior leaders of the party had to intervene. They persuaded, pressured, cajoled Gandhi-ji to leave Sarla. Gandhiji in his later days slept naked with his two nieces to experiment with celibacy. Pandit Nehru had told him not to do so as the country would rise against him but Gandhi-ji did not budge."

3) That although there was no such person as "Sarla Chaudhary" as described (which is probably a patently deliberate device devised by Ashutosh to claim she is a fictional character) it is obvious he is alluding to my deceased great-grand-aunt Sarala Debi Chaudhurani (who unfortunately has left behind no direct descendants to counter Ashutosh's calumny) using the despicable device of innuendo employed by gutter columnists.

4) I and my family are upset that NDTV.com website has published Ashutosh's distortions linking Mohandas Gandhi's sexual (masturbatory) fantasies to my deceased family members names to besmirch their iconic places in history. It is relevant to mention that Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani is the pre-eminent feminist icon of India, prominent in nationalist and Congress circles and had written the musical score for both India's National Antem (ie. Jana Gana Mana) as well as the National song (ie. Bande Mataram). In fact these nation binding anthems were greatly popularised in Upper India by Smt. Sarala Debi of the highly nationalistic Adi Brahmo Samaj (a religious minority) of which I am an 'acharya' and an attack on Smt. Sarala Debi or Gurudev Rabindra Nath Tagore simply to defend a misogynistic sex-crazed rapist Minister is also an attack on our minority religion.

5) For your Eminence's information, Gandhi was never in India in 1910 (or even 1911, 1912, 1913....) whereas Pulitzer-Prize winning reporter Joseph Lelyveld writes that Gandhi was then (ie. since 1908) in a homo-erotic relationship with Hermann Kaltenbach in South Africa. Please see the ABC TC (US) url
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/gandhi-book-claims-indian-leader-bisexual-racist/story?id=13255847

Accordingly, I say that if at all the Congress Party or Ms. Kasturba Gandhi ('Ba') was very disturbed with Mr. Gandhi in 1910s, it was because of Mr. Gandhi's homo-erotic activities and homosexual / pedophilic proclivities rather than any alleged relationship (sexual or otherwise) with Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani.

6) Accordingly, I sincerely hope that Hon'ble Commission impleads me as a complainant and strongly indicts Shri Ashutosh Gupta and NDTV.com. I also seek permission to submit my evidence during proceedings as and when directed by your honor.

PS : I am a non-political person and am filing this in my personal capacity as a relative of Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani (deceased) to defend her honour.

Sincerely,

Sarbajit Roy

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

Tel : 8010205897

Re: [IAC#RG] HAPPY PONGAL -- 2017 !

Hi Devinnder, HAPPY PONGAL TO YOU AND FAMLY

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:29 PM, N.Sudhaharan <pavicss@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Devinder Chopraji
Wish you happy and prosperous pongal

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Devinder Chopra <ddchop47@gmail.com> wrote:
Happy Pongal to all!
We thank sun for burning himself to save us.
We thank plants sacrificing their life for us.
And we thank all the creatures helping us to live in this world for some time.May this auspicious festival bring youOverflowing happiness, joy and prosperity
Wishing you a Blessed and a Happy Pongal!

devinder das chopra in gurugram "not happy" to be ruled, sooner than later, by ORDINANCES that will fling the powers of the GMDA as democratic processes are difficult for the Turncoats among us ! That may now get slung after the so-called christening of our Rupee thru' demonetization. Neither the Parliament nor the Councillors of MCG could function....in the previous year of the Lord -- 2016 !
***

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

--
With Warm Regards,
N.Sudhaharan
Sr Consultant
9821377285
NewDelhi

Please don't print this Email unless you really need to - this will preserve trees on planet earth.

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in