Hum Janenge

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] STRICTLY PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL

Worthless, scandalous, personal writings only seem now be originating in this forum. My e mail may please be deleted from the mailing list.

R.N.Malhotra
Former Chairman Railway Board

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: cmdelhi <cmdelhi@nic.in>; kapil bajaj <bajajk74@gmail.com>; indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] STRICTLY PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL

To:

Chief Minister GNCTD

Kind attn: Shri Rajeev Gupta, OSD to CM

Dear Rajeev ji

I had received an email from Shri Kapil Bajaj, a journalist who is well known to Shri Arvind Kejriwal, regarding the liasons" / "bedroom farce" Shri Arvind Kejriwal allegedly had in 2008 with "the present chair of DCW", and which Shri Bajaj claims to have personally witnessed, and which, as per Mr. Bajaj, culminated in "apna aadmi" appointment of the said person as .Chairperson of Delhi Womens Commission.

Mr. Bajaj's allegations are also in the media, eg. NEWGRAM.COM run by a former Aam Aadmi Party volunteer Dr. Munish Raizada

http://www.newsgram.com/who-is-shilpa-her-sexual-affair-with-arvind-kejriwal-former-journalist-colleague-kapil-bajaj-raises-question/

Since Shri Bajaj has not named the individual in this alleged "sexual affair" with Mr. Kejriwal, but has only written to me (through his email) that it is the present chair of DCW, I am in a quandary considering that the statutory RTI disclosure of Delhi Govt mentions that Smt. Barkha Singh is Chairperson of DCW, the copy of which was emailed by me to CM Delhi's email ID earlier but no reply was received.

In the meantime, a lady one Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind is claiming in public to be the Chairperson of Delhi Women's Commission and has leveled serious allegations by innuendo seemingly against Dr. Harsh Vardhan, Union Minister of Science and Technology, who is inter-alia the BJP's Member of Parliament for the constituency where GB Road brothels are situated.

In these circumstances, I would be highly obliged if Delhi Govt locates and provides me by close of work today the gazette notifications or orders related to the appointment of present Chairperson and members of the Delhi Women's Commission. In the absence of such notification from GNCTD I shall presume that Smt. Barkha Singh is the present DCW chair and I shall be contacting her directly concerning Mr. Bajaj's allegations.

Alternatively, Hon'ble Chief Minister may kindly direct whoever is the Chairperson of Delhi Women's Commission to publicly name the "Union Minister and important Delhi-based leader of a national party" who is allegedly the patron of the GB Road prostitution brothels as was alleged at a widely reported press conference held by Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind on or about 22.Sept.2016, again widely reported.

http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/dcw-chief-swati-maliwal-sex-racket-gb-road-union-minister/

I have reason to believe and am aggrieved that these allegations by innuendo directed seemingly at Dr. Harsh Vardhan are at the instance (so-called "credible lead") of one Shri Ashutosh Gupta, National spokesperson of Aam Aadmi Party, who lost to Shri Harsh Vardhan in the last Lok Sabha elections.and who bears a grudge against Dr. Harsh Vardhan. Mr. Ashutosh is the same lunatic person who publicly alleged that my deceased relative was in a sexual affair with Mr. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and I say that Mr. Ashtosh Gupta has no credibility whatsoever.

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor

India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony

New Delhi 110024

On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Kapil Bajaj

Thanks for your prompt reply.

1) The only other recipient of my email is Arvind Kejriwal <cmdelhi@...>, I would therefore be obliged if my communication is not circulated.

2) I conveyed the "imputations" as I understood it. beginning with " .. recounts an incident in Kejriwal's liaison with a young woman who now chairs a statutory body of his government.".

3) Since Arvind, and apparently everybody who has worked for him, habitually believes in writing fiction and passing off fiction as fact <see annexure-1), I am highly aggrieved that Ashutosh chose to make scandalous imputations concerning my relative and he was not immediately dismissed from Arvind's party. It is no defence that Ashutosh, being a professional journalist like you, slightly altered the name of the fermale through years of professional experience.

4) As per you, the "relationship" was "informal" and involved an episode you witnessed "Behind closed door" and described inter-alia in the following language "It was an extraordinary sight. .. The Ramon Magsaysay award winning 'social activist,' whom I had witnessed being feted in Kochi the other day for promoting transparency, was engaged in some kind of secret bedroom farce with his own young colleague. "

5) Arvind Kejriwal is a public figure who voluntarily joined politics and fought elections. If the result of those elections permits him to appoint meritless people only because they are "related" to him, then I (as a citizen of India and elector of Delhi) have every right to question him directly, and I shall do so. Arvind is equally free to choose not to reply and I look forward to seeing which officer his efficient OSD will forward my email/s to this time.

sincerely,

Sarbajit Roy
Mob : +91-8010205897

On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Kapil Bajaj <bajajk74@gmail.com> wrote:
Whoever is the recipient of Sarbajit Roy's mail,

1. My article, 'My Stint with Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and
'Social Activism,' does not use the phrases "sexual relationship,"
"at night," or name "Swati Maliwal," nor did I use these phrases and
the name in any interaction with Sarbjit Roy.

2. I never told Sarbjit Roy that I am "saddened by the way politics
seems to have affected you".

3. I never "asked" Sarbjit Roy to contact "you" directly concerning my "piece".

kapil

On 09/10/2016, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> *To*:
> Shri Arvind Kejriwal
> Chief Minister of Delhi
>
> *PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL*
>
> Dear Arvind
>
> I am receiving reports from various places that one of your close
> associates in PCRF has very recently imputed in public domain that you are
> / were in a sexual relationship with Swati Maliwal. Incidentally Swati
> Maliwal is now the Chairperson of the Delhi Commission for Women after you
> recommended her for the post and you publicly denied she was related to
> you.
>
> Accordingly, I have contacted the author of the piece (*My Stint with
> Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and 'Social Activism'*), and he
> reiterates his allegations that in November 2008 he observed you in a close
> position and sharing a bed with Ms. Maliwal behind locked doors in a guest
> house at night, despite that.all of you had separate rooms. The author has
> also written in the same piece that he observed you giving Ms. Maliwal
> large denomination notes (currency) when she requested it.
>
> I am sure that you would be aware of what I am alluding to, however, I can
> supply a copy of the piece if you need it.
>
> I would hope/expect that you swiftly rebut / nip these claims made by your
> associate. To me at least, and you know that I am highly sceptical of
> people who make such allegations with thin or no evidence, there appears to
> be some prima-facie veracity in the detailed circumstances and motives
> narrated by this 'public spirited' author who, like me, is saddened by the
> way politics seems to have affected you.
>
> *NB*: I am highly offended that Ashutosh contines as National Spokesperson
> for your party after he publicly insulted my ancestor Ms. Sarlaa (Debi)
> Chaudhurani by baselessly alleging she was in a sexual relationship with
> Gandhi. I am again requesting you to throw him out.
>
> I look forward to some action with 48-72 hours, ie. till Dusshera.
>
> *PS*: I am bcc'ing a copy of this email to the author of the piece, since

> he has asked me to contact you directly concerning his piece.
>
> sincerely / warmly,
>
>
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Mob: +91-8010205897
>

--
http://kbforyou.blogspot.in/

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Alarming pollution levels at R.K.Puram

Please remember that in the second round of odd-even someone set fire to the huge land fill mountain beyond Okhla. And villagers standardly burn biomass this season. By the time the second round started, commuters/commercial operators wisened up and bought odd-even no. New cars.

It was just an experiment, there's no need to condemn the person who instituted it but there IS a need to critically examine all the data(including such diverse things as international specs on different types of fuel and Indian fuels, diesel car models, prevailing wind patterns at that period, emissions from STPs, incinerators, generators, gases from covered drainage, wood burning by homeless people, pollution from incoming trucks, etc. )and their sources that is with the NGT and the CPCB, CSE, whoever. I.e., it needs an independent long-term scientific study without political agendas.

Joya Roy

On 19 Oct 2016 22:26, "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To
IAC-ians

We are pleased to report to our members that the Central Pollution Control Board has confirmed what IAC has been saying all along that Aam Aadmi Party's "Odd-Even" scheme did not cut pollution.

"Odd-even in Delhi had no impact, says Central Pollution Control Board"

Since yesterday the pollution in South Delhi was 7 times the prescribed limit, IAC has demanded that Secretary Environment GNCTD be charge-sheeted. Accordingly, the L-G has summoned the Secretary Environment today to LG House to explain these readings and CPCB findings.

It may be noted that the sensor data we are relying on is from DPCC's most modern setup located at R.K.Puram using radio-active technology and is situated inside a Kendriya Vidyalaya school in midst of greenery and open spaces, so readings are much lower than actual levels faced in crowded streets and markets.

As a short term measure, IAC has demanded that igniting and bursting of firecrackers be banned during Diwali to drive home AAP sarkar's inability to control pollution in Delhi.

Sarbajit

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Chief Minister of Delhi

Dear Chief Minister

Please find attached the PDF file (printed from DPCC air monitoring website) showing that 10 um SPM pollution levels at 700 are 7 times the permissible limits of 100. The readings are for 19th Oct 2016.

Since it is the Aam Aadmi Party govt which is responsible for this alarming situation, kindly immediately initiate disciplinary action against the Chairperson DPCC and Member Secretary DPCC for their gross corruption and failure to control the air pollution despite having the adequate real-time instrumentation which is recording these alarming pollution levels.

As a short term measure I strongly urge you to BAN the bursting and igniting of all firecrackers during this Diwali and prosecute offenders vigorously so that people of Delhi properly understand the pollution demon which is killing them.

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy
B/59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : +91-8010205897

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] STRICTLY PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL

To:

Chief Minister GNCTD

Kind attn: Shri Rajeev Gupta, OSD to CM

Dear Rajeev ji

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor

India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony

New Delhi 110024

On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Kapil Bajaj

Thanks for your prompt reply.

1) The only other recipient of my email is Arvind Kejriwal <cmdelhi@...>, I would therefore be obliged if my communication is not circulated.

2) I conveyed the "imputations" as I understood it. beginning with " .. recounts an incident in Kejriwal's liaison with a young woman who now chairs a statutory body of his government.".

3) Since Arvind, and apparently everybody who has worked for him, habitually believes in writing fiction and passing off fiction as fact <see annexure-1), I am highly aggrieved that Ashutosh chose to make scandalous imputations concerning my relative and he was not immediately dismissed from Arvind's party. It is no defence that Ashutosh, being a professional journalist like you, slightly altered the name of the fermale through years of professional experience.

4) As per you, the "relationship" was "informal" and involved an episode you witnessed "Behind closed door" and described inter-alia in the following language "It was an extraordinary sight. .. The Ramon Magsaysay award winning 'social activist,' whom I had witnessed being feted in Kochi the other day for promoting transparency, was engaged in some kind of secret bedroom farce with his own young colleague. "

5) Arvind Kejriwal is a public figure who voluntarily joined politics and fought elections. If the result of those elections permits him to appoint meritless people only because they are "related" to him, then I (as a citizen of India and elector of Delhi) have every right to question him directly, and I shall do so. Arvind is equally free to choose not to reply and I look forward to seeing which officer his efficient OSD will forward my email/s to this time.

sincerely,

Sarbajit Roy
Mob : +91-8010205897

On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Kapil Bajaj <bajajk74@gmail.com> wrote:
Whoever is the recipient of Sarbajit Roy's mail,

1. My article, 'My Stint with Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and
'Social Activism,' does not use the phrases "sexual relationship,"
"at night," or name "Swati Maliwal," nor did I use these phrases and
the name in any interaction with Sarbjit Roy.

2. I never told Sarbjit Roy that I am "saddened by the way politics
seems to have affected you".

3. I never "asked" Sarbjit Roy to contact "you" directly concerning my "piece".

kapil

On 09/10/2016, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> *To*:
> Shri Arvind Kejriwal
> Chief Minister of Delhi
>
> *PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL*
>
> Dear Arvind
>
> I am receiving reports from various places that one of your close
> associates in PCRF has very recently imputed in public domain that you are
> / were in a sexual relationship with Swati Maliwal. Incidentally Swati
> Maliwal is now the Chairperson of the Delhi Commission for Women after you
> recommended her for the post and you publicly denied she was related to
> you.
>
> Accordingly, I have contacted the author of the piece (*My Stint with
> Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and 'Social Activism'*), and he
> reiterates his allegations that in November 2008 he observed you in a close
> position and sharing a bed with Ms. Maliwal behind locked doors in a guest
> house at night, despite that.all of you had separate rooms. The author has
> also written in the same piece that he observed you giving Ms. Maliwal
> large denomination notes (currency) when she requested it.
>
> I am sure that you would be aware of what I am alluding to, however, I can
> supply a copy of the piece if you need it.
>
> I would hope/expect that you swiftly rebut / nip these claims made by your
> associate. To me at least, and you know that I am highly sceptical of
> people who make such allegations with thin or no evidence, there appears to
> be some prima-facie veracity in the detailed circumstances and motives
> narrated by this 'public spirited' author who, like me, is saddened by the
> way politics seems to have affected you.
>
> *NB*: I am highly offended that Ashutosh contines as National Spokesperson
> for your party after he publicly insulted my ancestor Ms. Sarlaa (Debi)
> Chaudhurani by baselessly alleging she was in a sexual relationship with
> Gandhi. I am again requesting you to throw him out.
>
> I look forward to some action with 48-72 hours, ie. till Dusshera.
>
> *PS*: I am bcc'ing a copy of this email to the author of the piece, since

> he has asked me to contact you directly concerning his piece.
>
> sincerely / warmly,
>
>
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Mob: +91-8010205897
>

--
http://kbforyou.blogspot.in/

Re: [IAC#RG] PM MODI /MODI & MODI

Security cover to Sh Arnab ji is a necessity.
Don't know about any other reason but the way he questions Pakistan generals and takes the questions right to the culprit's throat..
Yesterday on News Hour he insisted on knowing whereabouts of SUM hospital owner, some Nayar who runs Medical Colleges, Engg institutes and wat not in Orrisa.
These country straps have BIG money involved and can go to any length to silence ppl.
No other news channel does this so good and corners the culprit.
Hence security cover can be put to higher cat too..Well Worth.
With Regards to all.

On 18 Oct 2016 22:14, "Ambrish" <ambrish1008@gmail.com> wrote:

1. Two of news channel anchors have been provided with Y category security cover:

http://www.bhadas4media.com/tv/11024-modi-bhakt-arnab-sudhir

http://www.bhadas4media.com/tv/11025-andhrashtravadi-anchor

http://www.bhadas4media.com/tv/11017-arnab-y-cat

http://www.bhadas4media.com/tv/10959-formidable-tv-anchor

2. Some facts (logical) related to 24*7 working of PM Shri Modi

http://www.bhadas4media.com/article-comment/10977-pm-ke-chhutti-na-lene-ki-asliyat

3. Accused of Akhlaq's murder was National Hero (Dr Mahesh Sharma was present at the time of funeral of the accused)

https://thelogicalindian.com/news/mohammad-akhlaqs-murder-accused-given-martyr-stature/

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/dadri-on-edge-family-of-murder-accused-refuse-to-cremate-body-3069280/

http://deccandigest.com/in-narendra-modis-india-indians-arent-equal-even-in-death/

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] Alarming pollution levels at R.K.Puram

IAC-ians

We are pleased to report to our members that the Central Pollution Control Board has confirmed what IAC has been saying all along that Aam Aadmi Party's "Odd-Even" scheme did not cut pollution.

"Odd-even in Delhi had no impact, says Central Pollution Control Board"

Since yesterday the pollution in South Delhi was 7 times the prescribed limit, IAC has demanded that Secretary Environment GNCTD be charge-sheeted. Accordingly, the L-G has summoned the Secretary Environment today to LG House to explain these readings and CPCB findings.

It may be noted that the sensor data we are relying on is from DPCC's most modern setup located at R.K.Puram using radio-active technology and is situated inside a Kendriya Vidyalaya school in midst of greenery and open spaces, so readings are much lower than actual levels faced in crowded streets and markets.

As a short term measure, IAC has demanded that igniting and bursting of firecrackers be banned during Diwali to drive home AAP sarkar's inability to control pollution in Delhi.

Sarbajit

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To:
Chief Minister of Delhi

Dear Chief Minister

Please find attached the PDF file (printed from DPCC air monitoring website) showing that 10 um SPM pollution levels at 700 are 7 times the permissible limits of 100. The readings are for 19th Oct 2016.

Since it is the Aam Aadmi Party govt which is responsible for this alarming situation, kindly immediately initiate disciplinary action against the Chairperson DPCC and Member Secretary DPCC for their gross corruption and failure to control the air pollution despite having the adequate real-time instrumentation which is recording these alarming pollution levels.

As a short term measure I strongly urge you to BAN the bursting and igniting of all firecrackers during this Diwali and prosecute offenders vigorously so that people of Delhi properly understand the pollution demon which is killing them.

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy
B/59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : +91-8010205897

Re: [IAC#RG] Why Government buckles under U S pressure to lift restriction on NGOs

Dear Sir,

The problem with our Government appears to be their 'full faith' in Western policies, especially in USA. The Western countries have been following Capitalists economic method for developing themselves since last (couple of Centuries. In effect these countries became financially rich however considered inthe long run, approaching destruction not only of thesmselves but also of other Species as well as the planet. They taught in the colleges and Universities the same economic systems. Our GREat economists accordingly have learnt (obnly) this system and nothing else they can remember even. Once Dr Raghu Rajan left RBI Governorship, I was feeling that now some better days for Bhaarat and Bhaarateey people may come. But Shri Patelsaheb the new Governor appears to be well educated (and became expert as well) in the same economic systems and Government is continuing to follow in the same foot steps as those of Dr Raghu Rajanjee. I hope all of us are aware about the economic status (at present) of USA.; Their GDP is 16-17 Trillions US $ whereas their foreign debt amount to 4X this.Their economy is dependent only on weapon systems and hence they are busy (always) in wars with some or the other Nation/s. Possibly we are aware that till about 5 years before in USA, only the non-white people were on doles or BPL as they say. But now i.e. since last decade or so, even white people are getting BPL. I am attaching an article, "More Whites also Sinking into Poverty". by Shri Sherwood Ross published in Op Ed News dated 7 June 2014. Their published figures of unemployment will always be less than actual, since they have a system to remove those unemployed from their unemployed Register, if they continue to remain unemployed after 6 months of Govt support for the unemployment status. They are supposed to have got new employment after this 6 months break. None bothers if they are in fact employed or not..

Their economists as well are crying for changing the current economic Development model as it does not improve GDP without more sufferings of people. I am also attaching another article " We need a New Planetary Economic Model" by Rob Kall published in Op Ed News dated 5 September 2014. In current economic (development) model, the industrialists as well as Government bothers only for getting more money and not for health or the well being of citizens or the planet itself.

In fact we need not bother about what USA or the Western countries are approaching to economical catastrophe. But our Government is also 'progressing' on the same route and hence we need to worry. Kindly note that in our country more than 50% people are trying to survive on daily income of Rs 33 or less. Similarly we are already knowing that our farming or agriculture has been damaged due to the mechanization and chemical fertilizers (imposed by the British) and continued by our Government/s since Independence. It is not likely to improve till we return to our traditional method. And as per our Agriculture Minister we are progressing on the same system of providing chemical fertilizers and mechanization of our farming now also. For improving agriculture, I had written an article last year entitled "State of Agriculture in Bhaarat".. I am attaching that as well. Kindly go through all the articles attached and let Government also know the actual problems and their (required) solutions that are likely to give respite to us.

Kindly also note that never in the ancient History of Bhaarateey economy, importance was ever given for (earning) more money. Aim used to be to have happy and contented citizens under all situations. Please refer to अर्थशास्त्र by आर्य चाणक्य that was being followed by Bhaarateey kings.

With regards,

------Mukund Apte.

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:

To
India Against Corruption
Why Government buckles under U S pressure to lift restriction on NGOs

It is deeply disturbing to know that Modi government has allowed US based NGO "Compassionate International" to disburse funds to ten NGOs in India, which was banned earlier , after protest from U S government.

Earlier, this organization was banned from donating to Indian NGOs, as the funds were suspected to be utilised for wrong purposes such as religious conversion.

India is now going through anxious moments as terrorists and anti nationals are creating violence and terror attacks. There are number of organisations in India who call themselves NGOs , get donation from abroad and indulge in anti national activities as per the directions of the donors.

NGOs get money to block development projects such as nuclear power plants or carry out religious conversion or involve themselves in creating trouble in variety of ways to destabilize India by causing disturbances.

How can Modi government yield to such pressures from foreign governments to allow NGOs indulging in nefarious activities to get money from abroad? Even political leaders are said to be getting such money form abroad for their partisan activities.

Modi government should certainly not yield to any coercive threats from any country whatsoever and should stand by India at any cost to ensure that foreign money would not be allowed to flow into the country to be used for wrong purposes.

N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice for The Deprived
nandinivoice.com

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

With regards to all,
------Mukund Apte

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] STRICTLY PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL

Here you are Pandeyji

http://archive.is/Jk5FD

SWARAJ ABHIYAN (2009)

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Onkar <editoronkar@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Roy,

The Link of the Page you have mentioned in your Letter to Mr. kejriwal is not there. Perhaps it has been removed.

"We have noted that you have not replied to our earlier email dt. Oct.9 2016 and also that the misogynist abuser Mr. Ashutosh continues as National Spoksperson for the Aam Aadmi party. Now, since you have not denied the contents of Mr. Kapil Bajaj's piece (which we reported to you) alleging your own past liason/s and/or "bedroom farce" with Ms. Maliwal (@Shilpa), and since NEWSGRAM.COM (a news website in USA) has published some rather disturbing facts about Ms. Swati Maliwal and her keen interest in prostitution rackets in Delhi, the India Against Corruption ("IAC") is caused to publicly question you and/or your Government as follows:-"